Richard
@rwpickard.bsky.social
180 followers 220 following 1.3K posts
Reader, tree-hugger, teacher, preserver of foodstuffs. Canadian. Deleter of rwpickard from Twitter/X. http://boughtbooks.blogspot.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
rwpickard.bsky.social
Some of DDG's features don't work that well for me (words in a sequence, for example), but I only ever use Google when DDG has let me down conclusively.

Pretty common, though, to see AI-type results towards to the top of DDG's results (as we did with SEO and related puppetry)
Reposted by Richard
fishgottaswim.bsky.social
Before making duck with chanterelles for our Thanksgiving dinner, I am spending time with the proofs of my forthcoming book: thornapplepress.ca/books/the-ar...
I love the page design! I love the cover! So much to be thankful for...
computer screen showing most of a page of text a book cover featuring a detail from a portrait
rwpickard.bsky.social
Isn't that a good piece? I'm really appreciating when I find people working hard to articulate the horrors
rwpickard.bsky.social
I missed this news from 23 days ago. My bad: I'd assumed that Oxford intended to remain Oxford, rather than whatever trash its current administration is seeking. #againstAI
ox.ac.uk
NEW: Oxford will be the first UK university to give all staff and students free ChatGPT Edu access, from this academic year.

ChatGPT Edu is built for education, with enhanced privacy and security.
Graphic from the University of Oxford, featuring an image of a glowing, digital brain with the text: 'Generative AI at Oxford'. Highlights that ChatGPT Edu is now available to all staff and students. Includes a link for more information: ox.ac.uk/gen-ai
rwpickard.bsky.social
Also: by definition, OpenAI cannot help Canada grow "homegrown AI." It doesn't grow, and it's a corrosive metaphor, plus OpenAI isn't Canadian (and at this point is basically one of the evil empires)
rwpickard.bsky.social
Ok, it's almost certainly a waste of time, because the LLM/AI cadres will auto-respond in an attempt to outnumber the wise, but we can't cede the ground entirely. #againstAI
rwpickard.bsky.social
This article is such a good, terrible read, but on the positive side, it's full of wisely critical comrades.
rwpickard.bsky.social
That's what I kept saying, but with different phrasing.
rwpickard.bsky.social
"post-collapse liveability": speaking my language!
rwpickard.bsky.social
Like, how can you POSSIBLY include this as a survey question when I'm 92% finished: "What are the emerging security risks associated with AI, and how can Canada proactively mitigate future threats?"
rwpickard.bsky.social
Me: Many responses will come from boosters "using AI to write and submit their responses. If you're incapable of recognizing this, and that's what happens, then AI-manipulated survey results will be what ensures the government develops a doomed strategy that'll fail this nation."
rwpickard.bsky.social
I did the Canadian government's AI survey this week: good times. My fave question (by which I mean the one that pushed me closest to the brink) was maybe "What are the key barriers to AI adoption, and how can government and industry work together to accelerate responsible uptake?" #againstAI
a cartoon character with an angry look on his face and the words freetopsticker below him
Alt: Anger, the cartoon character from the movie Inside Out, looking angry and then having flame shoot out from the top of his head while he screams in rage
media.tenor.com
rwpickard.bsky.social
I considered not linking at all to KPMG's 'splainer page and download. No one should read this stuff except to build a counter-argument. But for my comrades who want to do just that, maybe it's okay to bury a link this far down the thread. Stay strong, friends. 10/10 kpmg.com/ca/en/home/i...
Generative AI and the future of education
Why higher education leaders are leaning into technology to drive student and employee success to build stronger institutions
kpmg.com
rwpickard.bsky.social
All across this country, though, it'll be getting flagged for overwhelmed administrators. In the same way that I blame my students' AI use on billionaires hunger for cash, not my students, I blame consultants for this situation, not the too-busy staff. KPMG's "report" should be ignored. Period. 9/
rwpickard.bsky.social
... No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation." Oh no, I was JUST about to trust my life to this slidedeck that so confidently extrapolates from answers by 423 randos! 8/
rwpickard.bsky.social
... Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. ... /7
rwpickard.bsky.social
I love KPMG's caveat, too, on slide 19, that's long enough for 3 skeets here: "The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity.... 6/
rwpickard.bsky.social
If so, the 11% of employees who are allegedly using AI while "Drafting or editing a legal brief or legal opinion" or the 5% while "Drafting or editing a legal contract" should be traceable . Probably that'd be just a spellcheck fake-AI anyway, but argh. #saveClippy 5/
rwpickard.bsky.social
Also p.18: they surveyed 2,551 people, so at most 2,128 post-secondary employees. Notably the slidedeck does NOT provide a precise number for employees, and there's no sign it wasn't just a genpop survey. I'd guess it's a lot lower than 423. 4/
rwpickard.bsky.social
So: when KPMG says "7 in 10 students are saying they are turning to generative AI for help rather than their instructor," they mean that someone else's online survey tool identified fewer than 300 students who were saying this, fewer than 200 at universities. Journalists NEED to notice this! 3/