polecopub
@polecopub.bsky.social
900 followers 330 following 420 posts
The bluesky account where publications are treated as social, political, technical and economic objects #STS #Openscience #PoliticalEconomy Blog: https://polecopub.hypotheses.org/ Matilda scientifc director: https://matilda.science/?l=en
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
polecopub.bsky.social
#helloesr CNRS senior researcher, working on the political economy of academic publications, scientific director of matilda.science?l=fr and tempted to make a corpus of how French academics present themselves when they reach bluesky
matilda.science
Reposted by polecopub
isidroaguillo.bsky.social
Our periodic review of the coverage of the major bibliographic databases (October 2025)
GS no longer the largest due to the huge increase of OpenAlex. New data for Xueshu
Reposted by polecopub
vdlorenzo.bsky.social
Predatory practices plague modern science, but the origins & reasons of their success can be identified—and solutions exist. Instead of blacklists, funding agencies should foster accreditation systems. See analyses & proposals of the EAM Task Force of @femsmicro.org on the matter shorturl.at/gVXJR
polecopub.bsky.social
Before these LLM bots, "answers" were not given; you would be offered websites on which actual answers could be found, by reading. Google's Matthew effect has been well documented, but that still makes a difference both in the need to read and in the trust towards these "answers".
Reposted by polecopub
matilda-science.bsky.social
That is why we have multiple sources in Matilda and deduplicate to get abstracts and, more importantly, full-text indexing to achieve maximum discoverability. #openscience #openresearchinformation
polecopub.bsky.social
Exactly what we expected at @matilda-science.bsky.social Soon "citation disadvantage" papers will objectify the cascading effects.
Reposted by polecopub
ludowaltman.bsky.social
Important observation by Aaron Tay: Articles published by Elsevier and Springer Nature may be increasingly difficult to find. For many of these articles abstracts are not made openly available, limiting article discoverability, in particular using AI tools.

@barcelonadori.bsky.social @oa2020.org
Reposted by polecopub
richardsever.bsky.social
Another record month for bioRxiv - and further evidence the pandemic spike+dip was just that and growth continues. Thanks to all involved and that includes 🫵
Reposted by polecopub
makedatacount.bsky.social
Today on the blog, we feature Matilda, a bibliographic platform built specifically for open science. We spoke with project lead Didier Torny about the project, and their plans to incorporate links to datasets for the articles they index in Matilda.

👉 makedatacount.org/read-our-blo...
polecopub.bsky.social
Asbestos was highly effective in mitigating the effects of fire. What could be the positive effect of LLM AI?
Reposted by polecopub
Reposted by polecopub
jonathanstea.bsky.social
RFK Jr: “Research on vaccines and autism has been suppressed.”

PubMed: “Here’s over 1200 research papers on vaccines and autism…

…including this first one which is a meta-analysis showing that vaccines are not associated with autism.”
polecopub.bsky.social
The new definition of guest authorship...
polecopub.bsky.social
OK, so Crossref-based.
polecopub.bsky.social
I knew for MDPI, I did not realise the fall for Frontiers was that high (I suppose you talk about WoS volume not Crossref volume)
polecopub.bsky.social
Most people don't realise how big Frontiers and MDPI have become (in volume).
Reposted by polecopub
smittermeier.bsky.social
Universities:
- Stop offering workshops on how to use ChatGPT to write papers
- stop using DeepL to translate your websites or make it sound useful for our research
- stop pretending AI usage is inevitable.

I don‘t want to work for institutions who can‘t employ critical thinking to new tech.
irisvanrooij.bsky.social
“university leaders … must act to help us collectively turn back the tide of garbage software, which fuels harmful tropes (e.g. so-called lazy students) and false frames (e.g. so-called efficiency or inevitability) to obtain market penetration and increase technological dependency”

3/🧵
Against the Uncritical Adoption of 'AI' Technologies in Academia
Under the banner of progress, products have been uncritically adopted or even imposed on users — in past centuries with tobacco and combustion engines, and in the 21st with social media. For these col...
doi.org
polecopub.bsky.social
I see it as a spectrum, humanities are very close to maths (replacing articles with books): one or two authors, very limited reading, hard to write, each word is weighed before publication.
polecopub.bsky.social
No, it is incredibly hard to write a math paper, to read it, to review it, so they just make a few of them, while biologists salami slice and publish the slightest correlation or the quickest experiment (not every biologist).
Reposted by polecopub
samuelmoore.org
In the past I've criticised the F1000 model for being editorially light touch, but my experience of publishing this article was really good. Two rounds of review with four expert reviewers who each provided really helpful feedback and have now approved the paper.

f1000research.com/articles/14-...
F1000Research Article: “I just very much love the journal”:  Understanding the community-led publishing landscape at the University of Cambridge.
Read the latest article version by Samuel Moore, Mandy Wigdorowitz, at F1000Research.
f1000research.com
Reposted by polecopub
dhm.bsky.social
Make sure to wish a librarian a happy Gerald Ford Trapped in The Penn Library Elevator Day.
A sign in an elevator

On the 19th day of September, 1984
Former U.S. President
Gerald R. Ford
was temporarily trapped in this elevator.
VAN PELT-DIETRICH
LIBRARY CENTER
Reposted by polecopub
peercommunityin.bsky.social
Yesterday, we had the pleasure of listening to Dorothy Bishop emphasize the responsibility of editors during the 12th PCI Webinar! If you weren't able to join, you can catch her talk and the following Q&A session at this link: youtu.be/0NJ87tYE8_s
PCI Webinar-Dorothy Bishop-How negligent publishers subvert quality control in scientific publishing
youtu.be