Iris van Rooij & Olivia Guest (2026). Combining Psychology with Artificial Intelligence: What Could Possibly Go Wrong? PsyArXiv osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/aue4m_v2 @olivia.science
Our aim is to make these ideas accessible for a.o. psych students. Hope we succeeded 🙂
Adding to the To Read list
magazine.scienceforthepeople.org/vol27-2-poli...
Adding to the To Read list
“ (…) many thousands should read it. It is refreshing, disturbing, entertaining, challenging, and inspiring. It is a model of historical, intellectual, and critical analysis at its very best” (1988, p. 142)
3/🧵
“ (…) many thousands should read it. It is refreshing, disturbing, entertaining, challenging, and inspiring. It is a model of historical, intellectual, and critical analysis at its very best” (1988, p. 142)
3/🧵
Henle, M. (1978). One man against the Nazis: Wolfgang Köhler. American Psychologist, 33(10), 939.
Let me see if I can find some of the other chapters too.
pure.mpg.de/rest/items/i...
6/🧵
Henle, M. (1978). One man against the Nazis: Wolfgang Köhler. American Psychologist, 33(10), 939.
Let me see if I can find some of the other chapters too.
pure.mpg.de/rest/items/i...
6/🧵
5/🧵
5/🧵
This quote caught my eye:
“(…) conceptual muddles result from careless terminology or, equally, careless terminology reflects conceptual muddles" (Henle, 1986, p. vii).
4/🧵
This quote caught my eye:
“(…) conceptual muddles result from careless terminology or, equally, careless terminology reflects conceptual muddles" (Henle, 1986, p. vii).
4/🧵
bsky.app/profile/open...
By @batoolmm.bsky.social
bsky.app/profile/open...
magazine.scienceforthepeople.org/vol27-2-poli...
magazine.scienceforthepeople.org/vol27-2-poli...
Will probably get a lot of nastiness for this on Bluesky, but I guess that's part of the same problem.
www.transformernews.ai/p/the-left-i...
direct link to sign: openletter.earth/open-letter-...
And don’t forget to cite us 🙏
Blokpoel, Mark & van Rooij, Iris (2021-2025). Theoretical modeling for cognitive science and psychology. computationalcognitivescience.github.io/lovelace/.
And don’t forget to cite us 🙏
Blokpoel, Mark & van Rooij, Iris (2021-2025). Theoretical modeling for cognitive science and psychology. computationalcognitivescience.github.io/lovelace/.
computationalcognitivescience.github.io/workshop/
computationalcognitivescience.github.io/workshop/
Recently, Mark updated Ch 9 & 10 so they have embedded, running and editable, code again.
Check it out! ✨
computationalcognitivescience.github.io/lovelace/
Recently, Mark updated Ch 9 & 10 so they have embedded, running and editable, code again.
Check it out! ✨
computationalcognitivescience.github.io/lovelace/
> Paralogisms and antinomies are the evidence that an
expression is systematically misleading. — Ryle (1931, p. 168)
which I'm sure inspired my "terminological disarray" ofc, see: www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fxyg...
> Paralogisms and antinomies are the evidence that an
expression is systematically misleading. — Ryle (1931, p. 168)
which I'm sure inspired my "terminological disarray" ofc, see: www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fxyg...
1/n
We analyse cog neuro theories showing how vicious regress, e.g. the homunculus fallacy, is (sadly) alive and well — and importantly how to avoid it. 1/
A metatheory of classical and modern connectionism. doi.org/10.1037/rev0...
We touch on what has been up with connectionism as a framework for computational modelling — & for everything it seems these days with AI and LLMs — pre-2010 vs post.
1/n
docs.google.com/document/d/1...
docs.google.com/document/d/1...
direct link to sign: openletter.earth/open-letter-...
direct link to sign: openletter.earth/open-letter-...