Katri Pynnöniemi
@katri.bsky.social
1.5K followers 700 following 74 posts
Associate Professor, Mannerheim Chair of Russian Security Studies, University of Helsinki and National Defence University of Finland
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Katri Pynnöniemi
johnsipher.bsky.social
“If Americans had a more clear-eyed view of Putin, they would see a dictator who’s bet everything on a failed invasion, a country losing its sphere of influence, and an economy…cooling. A realistic view of his power would strip Putin of his biggest leverage: the perception of his invincibility.”
theatlantic.com
Russia’s leader isn’t nearly as strong as he’s made out to be, Andrew Ryvkin writes. “A realistic view of his power would strip Putin of his biggest leverage: the perception of his invincibility”:
Putin Is Not Winning
Underestimating the Russian leader is dangerous, but ascribing dark powers to him plays right into his hands.
bit.ly
Reposted by Katri Pynnöniemi
thestudyofwar.bsky.social
2/ European officials continue to note how Russia is intensifying its covert & overt attacks against Europe, supporting ISW’s assessment that Russia has entered “Phase Zero” — the informational & psychological condition-setting phase — of its campaign to prepare for a possible future NATO-Russia war
Reposted by Katri Pynnöniemi
Reposted by Katri Pynnöniemi
olivia.science
important on LLMs for academics:

1️⃣ LLMs are usefully seen as lossy content-addressable systems

2️⃣ we can't automatically detect plagiarism

3️⃣ LLMs automate plagiarism & paper mills

4️⃣ we must protect literature from pollution

5️⃣ LLM use is a CoI

6️⃣ prompts do not cause output in authorial sense
5 Ghostwriter in the Machine
A unique selling point of these systems is conversing and writing in a human-like way. This is imminently understandable, although wrong-headed, when one realises these are systems that
essentially function as lossy2
content-addressable memory: when
input is given, the output generated by the model is text that
stochastically matches the input text. The reason text at the output looks novel is because by design the AI product performs
an automated version of what is known as mosaic or patchwork
plagiarism (Baždarić, 2013) — due to the nature of input masking and next token prediction, the output essentially uses similar words in similar orders to what it has been exposed to. This
makes the automated flagging of plagiarism unlikely, which is
also true when students or colleagues perform this type of copypaste and then thesaurus trick, and true when so-called AI plagiarism detectors falsely claim to detect AI-produced text (Edwards, 2023a). This aspect of LLM-based AI products can be
seen as an automation of plagiarism and especially of the research paper mill (Guest, 2025; Guest, Suarez, et al., 2025; van
Rooij, 2022): the “churn[ing] out [of] fake or poor-quality journal papers” (Sanderson, 2024; Committee on Publication Ethics, Either way, even if
the courts decide in the favour of companies, we should not allow
these companies with vested interests to write our papers (Fisher
et al., 2025), or to filter what we include in our papers. Because
it is not the case that we only operate based on legal precedents,
but also on our own ethical values and scientific integrity codes
(ALLEA, 2023; KNAW et al., 2018), and we have a direct duty to
protect, as with previous crises and in general, the literature from
pollution. In other words, the same issues as in previous sections
play out here, where essentially now every paper produced using
chatbot output must declare a conflict of interest, since the output text can be biased in subtle or direct ways by the company
who owns the bot (see Table 2).
Seen in the right light — AI products understood as contentaddressable systems — we see that framing the user, the academic
in this case, as the creator of the bot’s output is misplaced. The
input does not cause the output in an authorial sense, much like
input to a library search engine does not cause relevant articles
and books to be written (Guest, 2025). The respective authors
wrote those, not the search query!
Reposted by Katri Pynnöniemi
ecfr.eu
ECFR @ecfr.eu · 3d
Vladimir Putin has finally said the quiet part out loud. For the first time since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, he has explicitly blamed Europe for the war, writes @abarbashin.bsky.social @ecfreuropeansec.bsky.social
https://bit.ly/46PIkhV
Enemy number one: What Putin’s foreign policy speech says about Europe
At this year’s Valdai club, Vladimir Putin gave his most anti-EU speech yet, citing his determination to see new anti-establishment politicians to come to power and improve Europe’s relations with…
bit.ly
Reposted by Katri Pynnöniemi
Reposted by Katri Pynnöniemi
Reposted by Katri Pynnöniemi
nessanichasaide.bsky.social
Fantastic paper. Data by sector, geography, investor entity & distributional impact (in terms of wealth, race, education).
@gregorsemieniuk.bsky.social's conclusion below: "taxing incremental 2022 US profits as excess could've doubled clean energy investments or paid each US household $1,715".
gregorsemieniuk.bsky.social
🚨NEW PAPER🚨
We all know the 2022 energy price shock fueled the cost of living crisis. It also caused a profit bonanza for the very rich. We show the US reaped the largest profits ($377bn) of any country. 50% went to the richest 1%, only 1% to the bottom 50%. A🧵 www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
River or sankey diagram showing the allocation of profits from global oil and gas companies to quantiles of the US wealth size distribution via financial system intermediaries, such as asset managers, and categories of ultimate beneficiaries, such as business owners, pension funds and shareholders in listed companies. The scale is hundreds of billions of US dollars, and ultimately 50.4% of profits reaching the US personal wealth distribution go to the richest 1% of households.
Reposted by Katri Pynnöniemi
veikospolitis.bsky.social
#Europe and #NATO, after several calls to wake up, are slowly yawning while sitting in bedside. Would they listen to Dave Massikotte thought? foreignaffairs.com/russia/how-r... via @foreignaffairs.com
How Russia Recovered
What the Kremlin is learning from the war in Ukraine.
foreignaffairs.com
katri.bsky.social
Thanks a lot for reading, Keir!
Reposted by Katri Pynnöniemi
billkristolbulwark.bsky.social
“The crimes of Jeffrey Epstein and those who participated in them is a decades long abdication of institutional and personal responsibility, brought to light by a handful of dedicated journalists and the breathtaking bravery of once isolated, ignored vulnerable women.”

slate.com/news-and-pol...
The National Failure at the Heart of the Jeffrey Epstein Story
It is a great challenge to pay sustained attention to any one of the onslaught of moral or legal indignities unfolding in this moment.
slate.com
Reposted by Katri Pynnöniemi
robertmackey.bsky.social
The Oregon Republican Party tried to help Donald Trump make the case for military intervention in Portland with an image of a fiery protest — but since Portland is calm, they had to fabricate one by merging old photos of police in Ecuador and protesters in Brazil www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
Republicans post fake image of Oregon protest – using photos of South America
A federal judge had blocked Trump’s request to deploy California national guard to Portland
www.theguardian.com
Reposted by Katri Pynnöniemi
maks23.bsky.social
⚡️ In recent days, Russia has destroyed 2 transformer substations that powered Kharkiv. And looking at the dynamics of the attacks, it is already clear that the coming winter will be the most difficult for Kharkiv in all the years of the war, — the mayor of the city.
Reposted by Katri Pynnöniemi
nicolataylor.bsky.social
“Russia has no interest in kinetic confrontation but is eager to weaken our collective ability to think, act and mount a defense.”
andrewchak.bsky.social
🇪🇺 keeps waiting for invasion, meanwhile, 🇷🇺 is already inside the house.
Not with conventional forces, but with: influence operations poisoning civil discourse, targeted assassinations, strategic corruption subverting politics, lawfare stalling 🇪🇺’s collective defense
open.substack.com/pub/chakhoya...
Three reasons Russia is poking NATO
Moscow can't beat the West on the battlefield. So it's waging a different kind of war.
open.substack.com
Reposted by Katri Pynnöniemi
andersostlund.bsky.social
Good by Sweden's Minister of Finance, who battle propaganda about Russian economy.
Main points:
* RU inflation about 20%
* Liquid part of RU welfare fund not enough for deficit
* Intl inst (IMF et al) and media should not use data from RU
* All RU data likely false.
www.dn.se/debatt/vara-...
DN Debatt. ”Våra underrättelser visar sanningen bakom Putins siffror”
DN Debatt. Finansministern: Internationella finansiella institutioner hjälper Ryssland att sprida propaganda.
www.dn.se
Reposted by Katri Pynnöniemi
kevinrothrock.me
Putin read a poem earlier today in Valdai. It was the first third of Pushkin's "Borodino Anniversary," which he published in 1831 as part of his pro-imperialist opposition to Poland's "November Uprising." The poem celebrates Russia's defeat of Napoleon as a warning to future European intervention.
Reposted by Katri Pynnöniemi
rikefranke.bsky.social
First time I’ve seen this reported in the press after rumours among experts: BILD reports/confirms there was a “mothership drone” over Germany which sent out smaller drones.
Which a) really points to a capable actor and
b) is concerning because it increases possible reach of these drones