🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
banner
jeeshadow1.bsky.social
🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
@jeeshadow1.bsky.social
29-Politics and Star Shows. Team Queen Rhaenyra and Rhaenicent because I love pain. Rommunist. Literally a cat. Fuck Canon. City planner. He/they #BLM
@Jeeshadow1 on the other place
Lol lmao
December 8, 2025 at 7:20 PM
Reposted by 🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
there are errors of fact, logic and basic reasoning throughout. there is also the bizarre implicit claim that the president is the only democratically accountable figure in government, when we have a congress elected every two years.
December 5, 2025 at 1:40 PM
Reposted by 🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
this is an unbelievably poorly argued piece
December 5, 2025 at 1:36 PM
Reposted by 🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
That explains it: All of these SCOTUS decisions aggrandizing the President are actually a stealth campaign to empower and reinvigorate Congress. Yeah, that must be it.

www.nytimes.com/2025/12/05/o...
Opinion | Actually, the Supreme Court Has a Plan
www.nytimes.com
December 5, 2025 at 1:29 PM
As someone who works for a local government, I agree. Just show up to city council meetings and consistently, clearly, and respectfully speak about an issue you care about! Most local governments love feedback on what they should be doing.
I really can't emphasize enough that if you care about local politics, all you gotta do is show up. Just a regular schmegular person showing up. Literally just show up consistently in person and within a remarkably short amount of time, you will have a shocking amount of influence.
December 8, 2025 at 7:14 PM
I hate remembering that SCOTUS exists
December 8, 2025 at 6:13 PM
Reposted by 🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
The Supreme Court seems likely to back Trump's power to fire independent agency board members

apnews.com/article/supr...
The Supreme Court seems likely to back Trump's power to fire independent agency board members
The Supreme Court seems likely to expand presidential control over independent federal agencies, signaling support for President Donald Trump’s firing of board members.
apnews.com
December 8, 2025 at 6:11 PM
Reposted by 🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
First take out of court: The Court is almost certain to overturn Humphrey’s Executor, over the objections of an invigorated liberal bench.

The main question is how the conservatives get to five votes for their reasoning — and how expansive the scope will be.

More to come: www.lawdork.com
Off to the Supreme Court for today’s big arguments over Humphrey’s Executor and the president’s firing powers. A full report at Law Dork to come later. Sign up here: www.lawdork.com
December 8, 2025 at 5:59 PM
Reposted by 🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
Justice Gorsuch: Is it possible--"just maybe"--that we're setting our sights far too low and we should be blowing up many more structures of modern government?
December 8, 2025 at 3:48 PM
Reposted by 🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
On Monday morning, the Legislature announced a hastily scheduled meeting of the Government Operations Interim Committee to hold a hearing on proposed legislation for Tuesday's special session.
December 8, 2025 at 5:47 PM
The number of cases they rule on that just aren't proper controversies is very telling.
Dude. Yes. Alito and Thomas are of course the standout examples, but all of the Republican justices have tells in their writing and their questioning indicating that they are, to varying degrees, marinating their brains in dumb bitch juice
My theory, fwiw, is that Supreme Court Justices are not immune to Twitter brain poisoning. I suspect all six have horrific information environments and have therefore lost the ability to understand the people who don't agree with them.
December 8, 2025 at 6:09 PM
Reposted by 🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
Dude. Yes. Alito and Thomas are of course the standout examples, but all of the Republican justices have tells in their writing and their questioning indicating that they are, to varying degrees, marinating their brains in dumb bitch juice
My theory, fwiw, is that Supreme Court Justices are not immune to Twitter brain poisoning. I suspect all six have horrific information environments and have therefore lost the ability to understand the people who don't agree with them.
The part that I can't figure out is what John Roberts thinks he is doing. He used to seem to be a judge who was very attentive to appearances, I think on a theory that you can't draw too much attention to yourself without undermining your ability to continue to shape the law.
December 5, 2025 at 9:40 PM
I think Dobbs showed Roberts that he lost control control of the court, so he goes along with the radical stuff now so he still has the power to shape it to his whims.
The part that I can't figure out is what John Roberts thinks he is doing. He used to seem to be a judge who was very attentive to appearances, I think on a theory that you can't draw too much attention to yourself without undermining your ability to continue to shape the law.
Every legal story now is either

Ancient Circuit Judge Delivers Crystal Clear 100 Page Rebuke To Trumpist Overreach

or

In Unsigned Shadow Docket Decision, 6-3 Majority Declares Trump Can Hunt People For Sport
December 8, 2025 at 6:09 PM
Reposted by 🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
Every legal story now is either

Ancient Circuit Judge Delivers Crystal Clear 100 Page Rebuke To Trumpist Overreach

or

In Unsigned Shadow Docket Decision, 6-3 Majority Declares Trump Can Hunt People For Sport
October 3, 2025 at 10:26 PM
Reposted by 🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
SCOTUS' LGBTQ books decision destabilized secular, public education by effectively giving religious parents a veto over curricula they dislike.

I agree with @mtsw.bsky.social that this case could further harm public schools by making them unsafe for many children. The goal here is pretty clear.
December 8, 2025 at 2:48 PM
Reposted by 🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
Full orders list: www.supremecourt.gov/orders/court...

Cert petition: www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25...

Religious anti-vaxers have had a very encouraging day at the Supreme Court.
December 8, 2025 at 2:40 PM
Reposted by 🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
The Supreme Court just set aside a 2nd Circuit decision upholding New York's requirement that all school students, public and private, obtain certain vaccinations, without any religious exemptions. It orders the 2nd Circuit to reconsider the ruling in light of SCOTUS' LGBTQ school books decision.
December 8, 2025 at 2:38 PM
Reposted by 🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
The goal is to do what traditional tv shows have done for decades until recently
‘FALLOUT’ Season 3 is aiming to begin filming in Summer 2026

The goal is to release new seasons as fast as possible.

(Source: youtu.be/7Xes4q43OcI?...)
December 8, 2025 at 3:19 AM
Reposted by 🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
I think every single day about how Schumer wrote in his latest book that the Serbs and Bosnians got over it
December 8, 2025 at 2:09 AM
Reposted by 🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
every fucking time I go back to thinking about a civil war battle I inevitably think of this post. cursed forever
ever wondered about what ranking officers in the us civil war were like? good news. there's not that many types of them. here you go
December 8, 2025 at 1:58 AM
Reposted by 🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
the peak of this chud behavior was David Lammy in the UK doing a "why aren't liberals outraged about this?" video about Sudan as a pot shot against Labour critics of the UKG's position on Palestine— only for it to be revealed Lammy's foreign ministry was expediting arms sales to the fucking UAE lol
Why is chudification happening in real time to like 90% of politicians across the spectrum
December 7, 2025 at 11:08 PM
Reposted by 🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
Genuinely, how can someone believe this?
December 7, 2025 at 9:52 PM
Reposted by 🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
Oooh isn't this basically the same messaging the Biden admin used to address voter concerns about the economy?

Wonder for well it will go for the admin this time.
You have to be fucking kidding me with this shit!

“Americans don’t realize how good they have it.” ~ Scott Bessent on affordability
December 7, 2025 at 9:13 PM
Reposted by 🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
this gets to the fundamental lawlessness. the difference between law as a game and law as a tool of government.

birthright citizenship is the law. nothing has changed. the documents are the same. if that can change based on *nothing*, you don't have a real constitution in the first place.
also, let’s say wurman is right. well, we have had nearly 160 years of unlimited birthright citizenship that has been affirmed again and again by generations of Americans. whatever the original intent, that is what the birthright clause *means*.
December 7, 2025 at 7:40 PM
Reposted by 🍉👻Jeeshadow ᐰ🍉
because literally every generation does this
December 7, 2025 at 8:11 PM