Dana
@danarovang.bsky.social
94 followers 140 following 10 posts
Makes media and history. Sometimes both at once. Producer, writer, nonprofit founder of obscure histories. PhD Hist/Phil Science
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Dana
AI art does not exist. It is an oxymoron.
Reposted by Dana
you know him
Miserable man! Oh! most contemptible and worthy of all scorn
Reposted by Dana
My gut feeling right now is that once we get past this AI LLM boom and bust cycle, the skill of knowing how to have an imagination and how to create stories with your own human skill will be even more valuable than before. I would spend this time learning how to do everything you can to nurture that
Reposted by Dana
But I was told AI will replace historians
AI-update - to avoid the confusion between image and text, I asked Google Genesis to produce the same timeline as in my original prompt (1885-1945), but this time without any words...🤷‍♂️
Right? Are we saving time, or losing authenticity? I mean, the answer is “both,” but where do we place the value?
The process of doing things - like making art or making history - is joyful. It’s messy, complicated, and frustrating, but it’s also creating something from nothing, all on your own. And it is a joy.
Consumer facing "A.i." is about triggering the excretion of a mediocre product. It's a rejection of PROCESS. Life itself is process, not fucking product. Push "A.i." on kids and you rob them of the joyful experience of life itself. I am not exaggerating.
Boosting for visibility. Once again for the back:

AI is not human and it is not good at telling human stories.
So apparently, it may turn out that The Wizard of Oz at the Las Vegas Sphere wasn’t entirely made in AI and Google threw the VFX crew under the bus by claiming it was all done by artificial intelligence.

If true, then fucking yikes.
Reposted by Dana
Reposted by Dana
I was not born to be forced. I will breathe after my own fashion. Let us see who is the strongest.

~Henry David Thoreau,
Reposted by Dana
This October, the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine is projected to hit a once-in-a-generation milestone: 1 trillion web pages archived.

We’ll be commemorating this historic achievement on October 22 with a global celebration ➡️ blog.archive.org/2025/07/01/w...

Want to take part? 🧵 #Wayback1T
Reposted by Dana
Guys, the final deadline for being shocked that Mamdani’s mom is Mira Nair is next Monday, June 30th, write it down
Reposted by Dana
"i asked chatgpt, i asked grok" yeah well i asked frankenstein and he was like "i'm the doctor, not the monster!" and i was like "well you're kind of a monster tho also" so
"i asked chatgpt" yeah well i went to the doctor, i went to the mountains, i looked to the children, i drank from the fountains there's more than one answer to these questions pointing me in a crooked line and the less I seek my source for some definitive closer I am to fine
Reposted by Dana
And before someone asks, because someone always does, the solution to the "begs the question" problem is to never use the phrase at all for anything.

It's inadequate and unclear in its original sense and target practice in its new sense.
Reposted by Dana
Yes. I am right. I am seeing how Chat GPT is ruining students critical thinking and writing skills in real time. It is not the future. It is a tool designed to render the populace helpless, to make people doubt their innate intelligence, and to foster overreliance on technology.
@roxanegay.bsky.social maybe you’re right.
A new study from MIT’s Media Lab (not yet peer-reviewed & small sample size): ChatGPT May Be Eroding Critical Thinking Skills. [time.com]
Reposted by Dana
I suspect that fact that the vast majority of LLM users don’t seem to have received this (really very simple!) message is because the AI companies have a vested interest in us not understanding it. “ChatGPT is smart, it just makes mistakes sometimes” is much more marketable than the truth.
Chatbots — LLMs — do not know facts and are not designed to be able to accurately answer factual questions. They are designed to find and mimic patterns of words, probabilistically. When they’re “right” it’s because correct things are often written down, so those patterns are frequent. That’s all.
Reposted by Dana
I dreamt last night of the three weird sisters
Reposted by Dana
buy them by the dozen
I saw this sign in an antique shop yesterday and I can’t stop thinking about it. Books are like eggs
Reposted by Dana
I kid you not, my work knows that I do drawing on the side and someone in the office told me AI could save me time and my response was "but I like drawing" and it broke them. They didn't know how to answer, they just couldn't comprehend that people make art because they like making art.
Hard disagree. I’m rediscovering my old follows from Twitter every day in here. It’s a process of restoration and reclamation.
Seriously, such an agonizing pet peeve
We need more AI for good — like a “find my pillowcase” tracker after I do laundry.
Reposted by Dana
I’m late to this interview with Tony Gilroy but I think his answer, about why most art is progressive, hits the nail on the head. www.nytimes.com/2025/06/05/o...
When deception in wartime involved actual practical illusions.
"Tactical deceptions" — fabricated dummy platoons, "psyops", and other martial methods of misdirection — were used throughout WWII, often with stunning success. OH writer Matthew Adams closes out his three-article journey about the Allied Forces' use of deception that led to operational success.