Dedekind Slut
@chasmat.bsky.social
they can’t do that, that’s illegal
Pinned
ugh, based Thomas now??? fine
Justices Gorsuch and Thomas, who never agree on anything concerning federal Indian law, agree that the federal government doesn't have plenary power over Native nations. This is a remarkable joint statement that should lead Justice Thomas to revisit a hell of a lot of things he has previously said
November 10, 2025 at 7:43 PM
ugh, based Thomas now??? fine
Holy shit lmao. If you see Joyce Carol Oates, buy her a drink
November 10, 2025 at 6:54 PM
Holy shit lmao. If you see Joyce Carol Oates, buy her a drink
make 42 U.S.C. § 1983 great again
LOL I FORGOT SHE HAS TO PAY $360,000 FOR BEING A HOMOPHOBIC BITCH
November 10, 2025 at 6:24 PM
make 42 U.S.C. § 1983 great again
lmao, I’m not mad I’m actually laughing
BREAKING
The 1st Circuit REJECTS Trump DOJ's request to pause a judge's order to pay up Nov's SNAP funds to the states.
The SCOTUS stay will expire within 48 hours absent further action from the justices, per its terms.
Doc ecf.ca1.uscourts.gov/n/beam/servl...
The 1st Circuit REJECTS Trump DOJ's request to pause a judge's order to pay up Nov's SNAP funds to the states.
The SCOTUS stay will expire within 48 hours absent further action from the justices, per its terms.
Doc ecf.ca1.uscourts.gov/n/beam/servl...
November 10, 2025 at 5:19 AM
lmao, I’m not mad I’m actually laughing
Reposted by Dedekind Slut
Warner is up for reelection. He was widely seen driving towards surrender behind the scenes, but he's voting no in public because it's unpopular. The real question is whether he supports a senate leadership change. If not, someone who supports senate leadership change should primary him.
But I cannot support a deal that still leaves millions of Americans wondering how they are going to pay for their health care or whether they will be able to afford to get sick.
November 10, 2025 at 1:56 AM
Warner is up for reelection. He was widely seen driving towards surrender behind the scenes, but he's voting no in public because it's unpopular. The real question is whether he supports a senate leadership change. If not, someone who supports senate leadership change should primary him.
Reposted by Dedekind Slut
This has to be the demand - not just a unfocused "fuck the cavers", but a focused demand to replace Schumer with someone who has already proven up to the moment. I will be making regular calls to have Schiff and Padilla demand this, and the more of us that do the more real it could be.
Van Hollen Senate Minority Leader vote when
November 10, 2025 at 3:58 AM
This has to be the demand - not just a unfocused "fuck the cavers", but a focused demand to replace Schumer with someone who has already proven up to the moment. I will be making regular calls to have Schiff and Padilla demand this, and the more of us that do the more real it could be.
Yah it’s called traditional marriage??
Every gay relationship has the bf who posts online constantly and the bf who hardly ever posts
November 10, 2025 at 4:17 AM
Yah it’s called traditional marriage??
Okay guys, my normie thirst follows are posting about it now. Chuck Schumer has lost the Mandate of Heaven
November 10, 2025 at 3:16 AM
Okay guys, my normie thirst follows are posting about it now. Chuck Schumer has lost the Mandate of Heaven
Table is open for reasons this is wrong
Since the Democrats worked extra hard to hide who actually supported this, I think the No Kings/Resistance position should be to primary every Democrat unless they publicly call for Schumer's ouster this week
Either they go into total rebellion mode, which they won't, or the people will
Either they go into total rebellion mode, which they won't, or the people will
November 10, 2025 at 2:58 AM
Table is open for reasons this is wrong
No man, you don’t get it. I argued the wallet inspector down from a 35% tax rate to 30%
One of the talking points I keep seeing from Democrats is that part of the deal is that it will "ensure federal workers receive back pay" but that's the existing law!
That's not something you've won in negotiations. That's just the letter of the law. You don't get to claim that as a win.
That's not something you've won in negotiations. That's just the letter of the law. You don't get to claim that as a win.
November 10, 2025 at 1:55 AM
No man, you don’t get it. I argued the wallet inspector down from a 35% tax rate to 30%
People are treating this agreement as if it were a private contract (I.e. Trump signing it means that he will be held to its implicit and explicit covenants) but that is not how legislation works. There is nothing stopping Trump from signing this and immediately saying it’s unconstitutional
November 10, 2025 at 12:24 AM
People are treating this agreement as if it were a private contract (I.e. Trump signing it means that he will be held to its implicit and explicit covenants) but that is not how legislation works. There is nothing stopping Trump from signing this and immediately saying it’s unconstitutional
Reposted by Dedekind Slut
mamdani should build bridges to both the zionist community and adams supporters by taking a page out of his predecessor's book and accepting bribes in the form of access to el al airport lounges
November 7, 2025 at 6:47 PM
mamdani should build bridges to both the zionist community and adams supporters by taking a page out of his predecessor's book and accepting bribes in the form of access to el al airport lounges
Honestly under the letter of the law you can, it’s just that clearance lawyers would be too conservative to give you the green light (a trademark loses its protection once it’s no longer being used)
After 5-10 years, you should be able to use the branding of legacy phones and media devices as-is in your movies and games. Give us a narrative “choices matter” adventure where you keep up with heart wrenching text conversations on an N-Gage
November 7, 2025 at 4:36 AM
Honestly under the letter of the law you can, it’s just that clearance lawyers would be too conservative to give you the green light (a trademark loses its protection once it’s no longer being used)
I was really hoping the defense would get a sandwich from Subway and offer it as demonstrative evidence
The jury is entering deliberations now. If they come to a verdict today, cool! If not, they’ll be dismissed at 5 and we will return tomorrow for Day 4 of not the simplest case in the history of the world.
November 5, 2025 at 8:08 PM
I was really hoping the defense would get a sandwich from Subway and offer it as demonstrative evidence
You don’t cross a fucking picket line. Maybe you weren’t raised to know this, which is understandable: people our age grew up in a nadir of the American labor movement.
Now you know
Now you know
Telling the gays this daily but especially now
You do not need that frap
You do not need that frap
BREAKING: Starbucks workers have just authorized a massive strike.
Union Starbucks baristas voted to authorize the strike by 92%.
Now baristas in over 25 cities could launch an unfair labor practice strike on Thursday, November 13th.
Union Starbucks baristas voted to authorize the strike by 92%.
Now baristas in over 25 cities could launch an unfair labor practice strike on Thursday, November 13th.
November 5, 2025 at 7:22 PM
You don’t cross a fucking picket line. Maybe you weren’t raised to know this, which is understandable: people our age grew up in a nadir of the American labor movement.
Now you know
Now you know
Wow, is “let me take a quick peek at your kid’s genitals, also books other than Left Behind are illegal” not a winning platform?
Holy shitballs it's hard to describe just how crazy it is that Pennridge dumped all its Republicans from the school board. Central Bucks goes back and forth but Pennridge is Perkasie. Woof.
November 5, 2025 at 5:03 AM
Wow, is “let me take a quick peek at your kid’s genitals, also books other than Left Behind are illegal” not a winning platform?
Reposted by Dedekind Slut
Zohran has ended his victory speech by summoning and entrapping the spirit of Andrew Cuomo in a Greater Soul Gem. The translucent former governor's mouth hangs open in a pained howl as he writhes within the jewel, but makes no sound.
November 5, 2025 at 4:31 AM
Zohran has ended his victory speech by summoning and entrapping the spirit of Andrew Cuomo in a Greater Soul Gem. The translucent former governor's mouth hangs open in a pained howl as he writhes within the jewel, but makes no sound.
I will vote for this man for whatever office he chooses
Brad Lander is at the victory party and, folks, he has the custom one-of-one “GOOD FUCKING RIDDANCE” shirt.
November 5, 2025 at 4:42 AM
I will vote for this man for whatever office he chooses
Call that a “Virginia subpoena”
![[REDACTED]](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:34jlhsnqzy4lrviksgwobhaf/bafkreidmibumtapn67lkws3itygqbbsopn3kxsaus2c3m3jvja7ujtri2q@jpeg)
November 5, 2025 at 4:19 AM
Call that a “Virginia subpoena”
Too slow with my phone to catch the fireworks, but suffice to say Bushwick is pleased
November 5, 2025 at 3:24 AM
Too slow with my phone to catch the fireworks, but suffice to say Bushwick is pleased
Reposted by Dedekind Slut
Reposted by Dedekind Slut
Still absolutely gobsmacked at the dishonesty here. Shouldn’t be, but wow. Bring back shame
November 4, 2025 at 4:50 AM
Still absolutely gobsmacked at the dishonesty here. Shouldn’t be, but wow. Bring back shame
Whither the paleo-nazi?
I'm sorry for the people in the article just now realizing it, but it's been clear for a while that some of the big institutions like Heritage have been staffed by what we used to call neo-nazis.
My assumption is that the New York Post has better sources inside Heritage than most other press outlets. One tidbit of note: Princeton's Robert P. George, a Heritage trustee, is said to be pushing fellow board members to oust its president Kevin Roberts. Hope he succeeds.
November 4, 2025 at 4:39 AM
Whither the paleo-nazi?
It’s bizarre to read a piece where the author just describes things as they occurred, as opposed to shoving their head up their own ass to ensure a satisfactory view from nowhere @nytimes.com
November 4, 2025 at 4:37 AM
It’s bizarre to read a piece where the author just describes things as they occurred, as opposed to shoving their head up their own ass to ensure a satisfactory view from nowhere @nytimes.com