Chris Hanretty
chanret.bsky.social
Chris Hanretty
@chanret.bsky.social

I teach politics at a university in the UK. I'm interested in electoral systems, public opinion, and the politics of non-majoritarian institutions like courts and regulators.

ORCID: 0000-0002-8932-9405

Political science 32%
Law 25%

With gusto!

time to set the geoguessr folks on this and work out where it is and how much it cost
Not a drill - there's a Britain-focused lectureship (FT, permanent) available.

www.jobs.ac.uk/job/DPQ588/l...
Lecturer in British and Comparative Politics at UCL
An academic position as a Lecturer in British and Comparative Politics is being advertised on jobs.ac.uk. Click now to find more details and explore additional academic job opportunities.
www.jobs.ac.uk

Oh, he had great speechwriters.

Anyone else watching season 2 of A Man on the Inside? I would have thought that anyone who inserted TM Scanlon books into one of their previous comedies would try and avoid wood-panelled faculty lounges and other outdated tropes

Reposted by Chris Hanretty

A hidden gem for PolSci in an Econ journal: mainstream right-wing parties seem to capture only a fraction (!) of the far-right vote when the latter don't run in an election. Crucially, left parties seem to gain votes! A key finding for understanding potential coalitions doi.org/10.1016/j.jp...

Can't win unless you turn up!

It's giving me strong Jakob Nielsen vibes

love it

I suspect net migration figures are like inflation figures: a claim about rates of change that people hear as a claim about levels.

Reposted by Chris Hanretty

Me: it would be good if government budget and spending review processes were done more openly and transparently

Also me: NOT LIKE THIS

Reposted by Tim Bale

Writing my conclusions section, including a paragraph on suggestions for future research, and then thinking, "but couldn't I do that here in this paper?"
a man is standing in front of a window and says just when i thought i was out they pull me back in
Alt: a man is standing in front of a window and says just when i thought i was out they pull me back in
media.tenor.com

Who is this optimist and what has he done with the real Phil?

Reposted by Chris Hanretty

Both the OBR's cock-up (v funny), and the multiple briefings from the Treasury and Chancellor (v explicit) could be an opportunity to have a sensible discussion about what is and isn't allowed in advance of the speech.

Dalton resigned for much less than almost everyone does these days.

Reposted by Chris Hanretty

The Public Services Performance Tracker is regularly described as ‘sobering’ but this is definitely the first time we’ve had ‘almost lyrical’

www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...

Let's say all that is true. What is the BBC going to do in 2030 when Trump is gone and when a Vance or a Stephen Miller tries the same tactic? It's really helpful for an institution to be able to say [credibly], "no, some things we don't budge on"

I don't think it is the way forward. You now can't defend any invited lecture on the basis that the BBC is not responsible for particular claims made by the presenter, because they've acted in this particular case to remove particular claims made

Then I think it would be better to say "based on legal advice they chose to remove the line", rather than "for legal reasons they couldn't" (and I think they made the wrong choice)

I think if in-house counsel really said, "the law compels you to remove that line", then the BBC's in a worse state than if no one there knew nothing about the Streisand effect.
Check out Hannah awesome JMP on job schedule unpredictability and how minimum wage policy affects such unpredictability: hannahfarkas.github.io/files/The_Ec...
Has no one in the BBC heard of the Streisand effect?

Did everyone think, "oh, Rutger Bregman, he'll be cool with this"?
I wish I didn’t have to share this. But the BBC has decided to censor my first Reith Lecture.

They deleted the line in which I describe Donald Trump as “the most openly corrupt president in American history.” /1
I wish I didn’t have to share this. But the BBC has decided to censor my first Reith Lecture.

They deleted the line in which I describe Donald Trump as “the most openly corrupt president in American history.” /1

My discipline and personal feelings: similar to what @aidanmcglynn.bsky.social describes

Yeah, that was a nadir

Agreed -- I hope this isn't on a bid-for basis

Massive about 240-300 just based on construction costs? but then you'd run into issues with maintenance and "not already having sold off the land"

It seems government, like the rest of us, is trying to make the money go further by trailing huge sums of money like £5m or £18m. As a proportion of total government spending, this is like a tea-spoon sized quantity dumped in in an Olympic sized swimming pool
Politico: Some pre-budget announcements over the past few days - "rail price freeze…minimum wage reforms to name and shame firms not paying it…£18m for kids' playgrounds…£5m to refresh secondary school libraries in England…recruiting 350 new planners…guaranteed student loan support for care leavers"

Reposted by Chris Hanretty

Politico: Some pre-budget announcements over the past few days - "rail price freeze…minimum wage reforms to name and shame firms not paying it…£18m for kids' playgrounds…£5m to refresh secondary school libraries in England…recruiting 350 new planners…guaranteed student loan support for care leavers"