Maya Sen
@mayasen.bsky.social
20K followers 400 following 1.2K posts

Professor, Harvard Kennedy School | Speaking in a personal capacity | https://msen.scholars.harvard.edu/

Economics 33%
Law 32%
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs

mayasen.bsky.social
“Less qualified than an economist?” is legitimately a very funny response to someone calling RFK Jr unqualified

mayasen.bsky.social
Thank you. It’s not that huge of a deal but I’m very happy to be moving in this direction at this stage of my career.

Reposted by Jane E. Fountain

mayasen.bsky.social
Happy to share that I’m now officially an affiliated faculty at Harvard Law School

Firmly believe law is where the most important conversations are happening, and am looking forward to building connections between law, policy, and politics. Thanks to those who helped make this happen!

mayasen.bsky.social
Otoh I have never once looked back at a letter I didn’t sign and say “boy I wish I had signed that!”

mayasen.bsky.social
As they say “I wish her luck in her future endeavors” since she does seem to be auditioning for something!

mayasen.bsky.social
It's not about her being really conservative (that's fine). It's just not a good piece.

mayasen.bsky.social
I think a problem with the piece is that universities needing to defend principles "even when doing so is inconvenient or costly" seems pretty unrelated to the issue of conservative speakers getting a cooler reception than they'd like

in fact, I can think of several better current examples...

mayasen.bsky.social
to say that the "point of her story" is that universities have to "guarantee forums to explore a diversity of ideas safely and openly" is such a non sequitur that I have to assume that she's auditioning for a conservative outlet somewhere

mayasen.bsky.social
Essay was a huge miss for me

Imagine still thinking woke university students are the real problem…if only!

mayasen.bsky.social
He has tried strategic maneuvering before on contentious issues where the Court’s legitimacy may be at stake (ACA, Dobbs)

mayasen.bsky.social
** Stares out the window thinking of Trump v US **

mayasen.bsky.social
I’ve said elsewhere that I am holding out some hope that Roberts and maybe one other conservative (I guess ACB) are playing a strategic long game and will in the end act to curb unconstitutional executive overreach

But man….

mayasen.bsky.social
And one of the few substantive “analyses,” the Kavanaugh concurrence from Noem v. Perdomo, points to the latter

mayasen.bsky.social
Firmly believe this & fears of immediate executive defiance are a consideration for some of the conservative justices

The problem is that this observationally indistinguishable from substantive policy agreement with the Trump agenda
atrupar.com
Amy Coney Barrett defends heavy use of the shadow docket: "If we wrote a long opinion, it might give the impression that we have finally resolved the issue, and in none of these cases have we finally resolved the issue."
atrupar.com
Amy Coney Barrett defends heavy use of the shadow docket: "If we wrote a long opinion, it might give the impression that we have finally resolved the issue, and in none of these cases have we finally resolved the issue."

mayasen.bsky.social
Consistent with billionaires’ involvement in politics as well - because they have money, they think they know better than anyone else
murshedz.bsky.social
“More than three dozen federal judges have told The New York Times that the Supreme Court’s flurry of brief, opaque emergency orders in cases related to the Trump administration have left them confused about how to proceed in those matters and are hurting the judiciary’s image with the public.”
Federal Judges, Warning of ‘Judicial Crisis,’ Fault Supreme Court’s Emergency Orders
www.nytimes.com

mayasen.bsky.social
I think all this means is people who are are underpaid relative to their private sector market value

mayasen.bsky.social
You can take issue with the subject matter, sure

But you should take issue with the fact that it’s a terribly written, uninsightful book

mayasen.bsky.social
Re: Jake Tapper, his Biden book was objectively one of the worst books I have read in years - bullet points strung together loosely by generic sentences. Repetitive.

No profound insights or interesting analysis. Like they had AI generate a book from their reporters’ notes.

mayasen.bsky.social
wild, & good for him

mayasen.bsky.social
I’d probably look for a different doctor

mayasen.bsky.social
I think in general policymakers understand the value high end academics bring to society

But they will tolerate spending for it only if there is political and economic stability - they will not incur political costs for it

mayasen.bsky.social
Oh yes. There’s that dimension, that will be bad as well. Without prestige, academics are sorely underpaid

I’m thinking about it from the perspective of policymakers and limited resources (both political and economic)