Lightnews — Scholar-powered news

Bod

@bodmass.bsky.social

230 followers 310 following 2.2K posts

Lefty greeny sort. Doing Chelsea, Milton Keynes, History, politics, science & women's rights.

Posts Media Videos Starter Packs

Pinned

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · Feb 6

This is what keeps bugging me.

How did so many supposed lefties decide to ignore everything they believe about class struggle in order to support neo liberal individualism so as to shit on women from such a great height that this foul rapist is given such an open goal?

21 18 84

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 1d

Or just pirate them.

To many to pay for the lot

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 1d

And the SC hasn't impacted non GRC holders in the slightest.

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 1d

No it hasn't.

As long as you didn't listen to those paid to tell you lies.

3 1

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 1d

Transwomen are no different to any other bloke and deserve no different treatment from other men

1 1

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 1d

Aw dude did they stop running non stop "aren't they sweet" stories?

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 1d

It still doesn't say anything relevant 5 mins later.

Remember, you know so little you thought the Supreme Court didn't follow the Human Rights Convention and that EHRC weren't on your side 🤪

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 1d

It's a nothing burger 🤷

"Shock horror!! Political appointee with no legal role who has campaigned against women's rights for 20 years is against women's rights" 🙄

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 1d

That little enabling act allows them to advise.

It does not allow them to overrule advice from the supreme court.

Of course parliament can change it, that has no relevance to anything.

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 1d

You don't know much do you?

There is no such legislation

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 1d

You don't know much do you?

The human rights act is UK law and the supreme court is the body that rules on compliance.

Not quangos.

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 1d

You don't know much do you?

Interpreting statute is the role of the supreme court, not a quango.

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 1d

You really don't know much do you?

The EHRC did intervene at the supreme court to argue against FWS.

Here's their view in advance...

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 1d

Nobody really cares about men demanding the right to expose themselves to women

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 1d

This would have changed the law how, exactly?

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 1d

Thanks.

Better than another whine about being treated as badly as the rest of us, I suppose 🤷

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 1d

Wrong in law and biology

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 1d

Parliament did in 2010

1 2

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 1d

Nothing about the law has changed.

2 2

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 1d

A law was passed in 2010 and Stonewall etc lied about it.

Happy to help.

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 1d

Just want you treated as all others are.

2 2

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 1d

The law is about men & women and doesn't care about any identities.

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 1d

Nope.

Very much about recognising the reality of their immutable sex.

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 1d

Because the law is much broader than that, not needing to mention every type of service covered individually.

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 2d

The law is the law.

This makes no difference

Bod @bodmass.bsky.social · 2d

Or alternatively, they stop getting they're cocks out on the women's changing room.

You appear to be hoping for your outcome though🤷

3 7