Scholar

Federica Genovese

H-index: 12
Economics 37%
Political science 33%
fgenovese.bsky.social
Huge free public good — well done to the @cssn.org team and all the authors
cssn.org
It's finally here! 100+ scholars, global scope, practical insights. “Climate Obstruction: A Global Assessment” shows how organized interests stall policy—and how governance can respond.

Open access available now! Or order for paperback and hardcover. cssn.org/wp-content/u...
cssn.org
It's finally here! 100+ scholars, global scope, practical insights. “Climate Obstruction: A Global Assessment” shows how organized interests stall policy—and how governance can respond.

Open access available now! Or order for paperback and hardcover. cssn.org/wp-content/u...
drsimevans.carbonbrief.org
Great to speak at the @energy-uk.org.uk conference just now, about the tenuous relationship between many media headlines & reality

Here's a taster

#eukconf25
fgenovese.bsky.social
of course some jobs really do not need *A level* English; just some English. and of course it is not my favourite policy. just not sure it is the debate one should spend a lot of political capital on
fgenovese.bsky.social
of all the hills out there, the fact that adults looking for work in the UK would need A-level English language skills is really not one I will die on.
fgenovese.bsky.social
“OpenAI has chosen not to disclose the carbon footprint of ChatGPT-5, its most advanced AI model to date. […] The company does not have formally announced climate or sustainability targets.

Altman has also expressed that he thinks artificial intelligence will solve climate change.”

😓🫠
fgenovese.bsky.social
As *always*, nothing happens in a power vacuum and who controls institutions controls the winners and losers of technological innovation
fgenovese.bsky.social
I think this might be a similar type of normative question like flying in the academic climate science community, just on steroids.

When do we limit ourselves? When do we stop?
fgenovese.bsky.social
In the higher education sector, I am hearing discussions of how AI may help ramp up climate education and spur climate awareness. Good qs but imo we cannot honestly speak abt that w/o speaking about how computing power is currently eating fossil fuels and asking how that research offsets that cost.
fgenovese.bsky.social
AI will have all types of effects on skilled work, some bad some perhaps good, but everyone who cares about climate disruption needs to explicitly confront that ramping data centers *in the current economic model* (with the current people in charge) will only accelerate greenhouse gas emissions.
rtakver.bsky.social
OpenAI *really* isn't hiding its intention to power the AI boom with fossil fuels.

New from me @desmog.com

www.desmog.com/2025/10/13/o...
fgenovese.bsky.social
AI will have all types of effects on skilled work, some bad some perhaps good, but everyone who cares about climate disruption needs to explicitly confront that ramping data centers *in the current economic model* (with the current people in charge) will only accelerate greenhouse gas emissions.

Reposted by Federica Genovese

redatamtam.bsky.social
I fully agree! Most people don't know that the Green party holds power in almost every major city in France (or is in the leading coalition). The RN has just one.

Mayor is Green: Lyon, Strasbourg, Bordeaux, Besançon, Tours, Annecy, Grenoble and Poitiers.

In coalition: Paris & Marseille.
fgenovese.bsky.social
Hello Mannheim! I'm presenting tomorrow at the Centre for European Social Research.

Come for all the empirical modelling you know all about, stay for all the stuff about oil in Northern Europe you know less about 🛢️🌊
Brexit paper presentation, October 14, Mannheim University
fgenovese.bsky.social
Local elections Monday:

Portugal resisted!

Will Tuscany resist (beyond expectations)?
fgenovese.bsky.social
Oh the post was well taken :) what we don’t know is how many progressive localized environmental movements can lead (if at all) to a large wave of mobilization on climate, and this is exactly what people like me should study more
fgenovese.bsky.social
There is a rich qualitative literature on local level mobilizations, and my meta reading of it is that success is more attainable around localized environmental problems where negative externality attribution is simpler and so is governance. Climate change is a whole different beast.
fgenovese.bsky.social
This also reminds me that it is basically impossible to teach climate politics holistically by teaching only the present without the past, the domestic side without the international one, the political economy aspects without the identity politics ones.

\end{stream of consciousness}
fgenovese.bsky.social
This brings me to my plea:

if we political scientists are (for obvious legit reasons) so obsessed with explaining the acceleration of far right success in the past decade, we should similarly track when progressive movements accelerated in history, taking actors by surprise, and how *that* worked.
fgenovese.bsky.social
As it appeared that those assumptions were actually not stable *at all*, or at least no longer in the GN, the fossil fuel establishment panicked at their marginal losses.

But bc at that point they had lost the control of the narrative, they could only engineer a violent backlash.

And here we are..
fgenovese.bsky.social
Paris accord was meant to be small beans as the int’l community was recovering from many fiascos.

🟢 parties were meant to remain niche as kitchen table issues dominated post-2009 politics.

Scientists were meant to stay unpopular technocrats/geeks.

Chinas electrification was meant to take decades.
fgenovese.bsky.social
It’s so difficult to mobilize ppl on green things and the power balance between movements and industry/fossil fuels is super skewed

So it’s v hard to overstate how, in the incremental logic of 30+yrs of climate politics, *that* moment should have not happened, at least not then & that aggressively.
fgenovese.bsky.social
Going through some history of climate politics notes from last week, I realize we dont appreciate enough the climate mobilization of mid2010s and subsequent electoral green wave of late 2010s.

That moment was never really meant to be in the cards and we need to better study how we got there

🪡 1/n

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m