ABC
What Goes from the BBC to RTVE
The United Kingdom has again shown that its democracy rests on institutions that respect themselves. After the controversial edition of a BBC documentary about Donald Trump, and other irregularities recently, both the director general of the public corporation, Tim Davie, and its director of news, Deborah Turness, have resigned to protect the guiding principle of a television funded with public money: neutrality. They did so after learning of criticisms from an internal adviser — a kind of counterweight that in Spain does not exist — with no greater scandal and recognizing errors that, although unintentional, could undermine public trust. They resigned for the good of the institution, out of respect for taxpayers and the principle that the exercise of public power must have limits. And, yes, this fills us with admiration. In Spain, by contrast, the model seems inverted. No one resigns and those at the helm do not draw any boundary. Not even when a high-audience program on RTVE presents as 'medical' or 'healthcare' a woman who is actually an administrative assistant and union activist, without anyone having apologized yet for such a lie. The setup served to attack the health management of a region governed by the opposition. The damage to credibility has had no consequences. There have been no dismissals. No explanations. Silence has been the institutional response. The Spanish public television not only does not rectify, but wastes. Recently RTVE has received a 63 million injection from the Ministry of Finance to sustain its ambitious external-production strategy, focused on programs that raise the audience through polarized talk shows, politicized entertainment and formats designed to please those in power. Its president, José Pablo López, puts it plainly: "As long as I can, I will keep asking for more funding." We are not facing a budget problem alone, but a matter of conception. Since the Government decreed a reform of RTVE’s law to increase from 10 to 15 the members of the Board of Directors, and thus guarantee a majority controlled by Parliament — i.e., by the governing coalition — and bypass the Senate — dominated by the opposition —, there has been no real chance of institutional oversight. It was so urgent for Pedro Sánchez to pass this reform that Parliament postponed its vote because of the Valencia flood disaster to push on with the decree. The BBC may be facing challenges, but it preserves a code of honor. In Spain, public television is in the hands of a leadership that no longer feels the need to pretend neutrality and slavishly obeys its master. Rather than guarding impartiality and pluralism, RTVE has become a communications apparatus at the service of power, shielded by an institutional architecture designed to neutralize criticism. It has become an official and obedient television because, as the government argues, it was necessary to counteract criticism from private media. The comparison hurts. Not out of nostalgia for a RTVE that once aspired to be like the BBC, but for the deliberate abandonment of those standards. The British allow themselves to lose valuable executives to safeguard principles. Here, principles are sacrificed to avoid losing seats. This difference should not leave us indifferent. Because this is about not only professional ethics, but democratic health. And if total impartiality is a chimera, the obligation to try remains a duty. That is why in London they resign. And in Madrid they stay silent.