In case anyone still thought this had anything to do with… whatever they say it’s about.
In case anyone still thought this had anything to do with… whatever they say it’s about.
Is this how I expected the Trump administration to use the shutdown? Why yes, yes it is.
Journalists: time to start asking people in education whether the shutdown mattered, and how.
Is this how I expected the Trump administration to use the shutdown? Why yes, yes it is.
Journalists: time to start asking people in education whether the shutdown mattered, and how.
*Or use a standard graphic, when one of your students likes to complain to U.S. Senators instead of asking a question in class.
*Or use a standard graphic, when one of your students likes to complain to U.S. Senators instead of asking a question in class.
even though those are numerically majority-female fields, men wield disproportionate power
even though those are numerically majority-female fields, men wield disproportionate power
www.nytimes.com/2021/02/23/b...
www.nytimes.com/2021/02/23/b...
“Richard Falk, retired professor, a UN special rapporteur on human rights in occupied Palestine, was on his way to Ottawa to speak at [a conference,] the Palestine Tribunal on Canadian Responsibility.”
“Richard Falk, retired professor, a UN special rapporteur on human rights in occupied Palestine, was on his way to Ottawa to speak at [a conference,] the Palestine Tribunal on Canadian Responsibility.”
Judge Elke Schwager summarized the case saying that if you want to build something and need components, "then you purchase them and do not use the property of others."
Admins setting limits on the curriculum is not “policing individual speech.”
“This does not diminish academic freedom. It reinforces the balance between academic freedom and academic responsibility.”
Admins setting limits on the curriculum is not “policing individual speech.”
“This does not diminish academic freedom. It reinforces the balance between academic freedom and academic responsibility.”
“Judges are experts in law, not [science].” They must “stay out of scientific debates and focus on whether the decision-makers used their expertise to make reasonable and procedurally fair decisions.”
“Procedural fairness is about the decision-making process itself, not the outcome."
“Judges are experts in law, not [science].” They must “stay out of scientific debates and focus on whether the decision-makers used their expertise to make reasonable and procedurally fair decisions.”
“Procedural fairness is about the decision-making process itself, not the outcome."
I just need to think of a concept for it.
I just need to think of a concept for it.
A bit of good thinking >>> lots of poor thinking.
Shocking!
A bit of good thinking >>> lots of poor thinking.
Shocking!
Its focus is cognitive science, but applies to other fields.
Its focus is cognitive science, but applies to other fields.
And it is still sold! My office has a perfect spot, next to a maple leaf.
And it is still sold! My office has a perfect spot, next to a maple leaf.
(And finally his accent makes sense.)
(And finally his accent makes sense.)
We often say that death is the great unifier as it’s the one thing that we all have in common. But sometimes, I look around and wonder if even the after-life is segregated.”
We often say that death is the great unifier as it’s the one thing that we all have in common. But sometimes, I look around and wonder if even the after-life is segregated.”
And the amicus: bit.ly/48Ad4Gu
And the amicus: bit.ly/48Ad4Gu