We have an issue, which is anything we do, since we do a lot of contracts with governments here and around the world, we have to be very careful how anything is perceived, and also how the next DOJ is going to deal with it.
Plus a Public Service Announcement:
KEY section of Department of Defense's Law of War Manual is 18.3.2.1.
The VERY rule on the "requirement" to refuse illegal orders gives as its paradigmatic example of what is "clearly illegal:
"orders to fire upon the shipwrecked."
Your opponents are running a historically corrupt government.
Be anti-corruption. Run on fixing the shit they broke, holding assholes accountable, and improving people’s lives.
Duh.
Your opponents are running a historically corrupt government.
Be anti-corruption. Run on fixing the shit they broke, holding assholes accountable, and improving people’s lives.
Duh.
It tells no story. It has no anchor in the actual world we actually live in. It is a type of politics that eschews being actually political at all.
It tells no story. It has no anchor in the actual world we actually live in. It is a type of politics that eschews being actually political at all.
It’s a slogan for people convinced this country *really* wants a Mike Bloomberg presidential campaign.
It’s a slogan for people convinced this country *really* wants a Mike Bloomberg presidential campaign.
but you don’t have to pretend otherwise to say we can and should be something else, you don’t have to hand it to the worst people alive
but you don’t have to pretend otherwise to say we can and should be something else, you don’t have to hand it to the worst people alive
we do not have to accept their framing, we can be better than that and better than them
“give me your tired, your poor…”
we do not have to accept their framing, we can be better than that and better than them
“give me your tired, your poor…”
so it’s very important that the next standard bearer believes that error was “not going hard enough on Trump” rather than “centrism was failed”
There's SO much inertia in favor of "ignore it and hope it goes away"
so it’s very important that the next standard bearer believes that error was “not going hard enough on Trump” rather than “centrism was failed”
Run on *that*
Run on *that*
OpenAI needs to make money on AI itself, and a lot of it
and I’m no longer convinced ChatGPT is the leading model even if it still has somewhat of a first mover advantage
OpenAI needs to make money on AI itself, and a lot of it
and I’m no longer convinced ChatGPT is the leading model even if it still has somewhat of a first mover advantage