Robyn Schreibke
@robynschreibke.bsky.social
Radicalised by existence
Trans woman
Bi
She/her
Trans woman
Bi
She/her
Reposted by Robyn Schreibke
There were pogroms in the UK less than a year ago. Now those responsible will feel that they have the backing of the Prime Minister. Wretched island.
May 12, 2025 at 11:25 AM
There were pogroms in the UK less than a year ago. Now those responsible will feel that they have the backing of the Prime Minister. Wretched island.
Are you are boring ignorant white guy?
Do you know a woman who is better than you?
Are you prepared to latch onto her to look like a half way decent person?
If you answered yes, have you ever thought about being co leader of the Greens?
Do you know a woman who is better than you?
Are you prepared to latch onto her to look like a half way decent person?
If you answered yes, have you ever thought about being co leader of the Greens?
May 12, 2025 at 8:52 AM
Are you are boring ignorant white guy?
Do you know a woman who is better than you?
Are you prepared to latch onto her to look like a half way decent person?
If you answered yes, have you ever thought about being co leader of the Greens?
Do you know a woman who is better than you?
Are you prepared to latch onto her to look like a half way decent person?
If you answered yes, have you ever thought about being co leader of the Greens?
Reposted by Robyn Schreibke
To be trans is to gamble everything about oneself on a hope of the possibility of freedom.
It is that capacity for hope that makes so many of us creative.
It is also what make people envy and hate us and makes established systems want to destroy us.
To hope is to want something better.
It is that capacity for hope that makes so many of us creative.
It is also what make people envy and hate us and makes established systems want to destroy us.
To hope is to want something better.
May 9, 2025 at 10:48 AM
To be trans is to gamble everything about oneself on a hope of the possibility of freedom.
It is that capacity for hope that makes so many of us creative.
It is also what make people envy and hate us and makes established systems want to destroy us.
To hope is to want something better.
It is that capacity for hope that makes so many of us creative.
It is also what make people envy and hate us and makes established systems want to destroy us.
To hope is to want something better.
This is strategically wrong. Labour's current approach will suppress turnout. Reform will fund it easier to turnout voters.
Additionally elections are won by teams. Labour are decimating their ability to get volunteers.
Additionally elections are won by teams. Labour are decimating their ability to get volunteers.
🔴‘The Cold Electoral Cynicism Behind Keir Starmer’s Blue Labour Strategy’
The Prime Minister’s advisers believe that when push comes to shove most progressive voters will have no real choice but to vote Labour, and they may be right, argues Neal Lawson
bylinetimes.com/2025/05/08/t...
The Prime Minister’s advisers believe that when push comes to shove most progressive voters will have no real choice but to vote Labour, and they may be right, argues Neal Lawson
bylinetimes.com/2025/05/08/t...
'The Cold Electoral Cynicism Behind Keir Starmer's Blue Labour Strategy'
The Prime Minister's advisers believe that when push comes to shove most progressive voters will have no real choice but to vote Labour, and they may be right, argues Neal Lawson
bylinetimes.com
May 8, 2025 at 9:58 AM
This is strategically wrong. Labour's current approach will suppress turnout. Reform will fund it easier to turnout voters.
Additionally elections are won by teams. Labour are decimating their ability to get volunteers.
Additionally elections are won by teams. Labour are decimating their ability to get volunteers.
Reposted by Robyn Schreibke
Despite anti-trans attacks becoming a central fixture of reactionary regimes, cis people remain thoroughly unequipped to comprehend the nature of the attacks against us, and too often humor the framing of reactionaries who dehumanize us and brand us hysterical, ridiculous, or delusional.
You've seen a bunch of cis people hailing Dawn Butler for her performance with Simon Clarke, the most ignorant man on earth, but maybe you've not seen a trans person reacting to it. It was terrible. Here's why:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgAg...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgAg...
Trans woman reacts to the WORST conversation you've ever seen (Dawn Butler vs Simon Clarke)
YouTube video by Katy Montgomerie
www.youtube.com
May 7, 2025 at 10:01 AM
Despite anti-trans attacks becoming a central fixture of reactionary regimes, cis people remain thoroughly unequipped to comprehend the nature of the attacks against us, and too often humor the framing of reactionaries who dehumanize us and brand us hysterical, ridiculous, or delusional.
Reposted by Robyn Schreibke
The time for “trans rights are human rights" was 2008. It's time for "we piss where we like", "gender cops are bastards", "Every Labour Office Is a Gender Neutral Toilet".
April 18, 2025 at 4:58 PM
The time for “trans rights are human rights" was 2008. It's time for "we piss where we like", "gender cops are bastards", "Every Labour Office Is a Gender Neutral Toilet".
Having spent 10 years working against Labour locally nothing Labour does surprises me.
Manchester Labour are the most amoral group of ghouls.
Manchester Labour are the most amoral group of ghouls.
May 2, 2025 at 10:32 AM
Having spent 10 years working against Labour locally nothing Labour does surprises me.
Manchester Labour are the most amoral group of ghouls.
Manchester Labour are the most amoral group of ghouls.
Most Labour MPs live in the world of the Labour party. It's a very insular world of fellow Labour people who they frequently hate but feel they have to be loyal to.
The only thing that keeps them together is the idea of being Labour.
I have met these people too often trust me.
The only thing that keeps them together is the idea of being Labour.
I have met these people too often trust me.
I think that most Labour MPs are very insulated from public opinion and avoid talking with the people whose lives they harm
So far the Hodge judgement and the EHRC interim guidance have been condemned by doctors, writers, historians, biologists and general celebs.
WHEN do we get to say to Starmer - as he moves ever more steadily in a trans exterminationist direction thinking it will get voted.
READ THE FUCKING ROOM
WHEN do we get to say to Starmer - as he moves ever more steadily in a trans exterminationist direction thinking it will get voted.
READ THE FUCKING ROOM
May 2, 2025 at 10:21 AM
Most Labour MPs live in the world of the Labour party. It's a very insular world of fellow Labour people who they frequently hate but feel they have to be loyal to.
The only thing that keeps them together is the idea of being Labour.
I have met these people too often trust me.
The only thing that keeps them together is the idea of being Labour.
I have met these people too often trust me.
When I see people argue this point I'm always struck by how power is flattened.
Labour are in government they can make policy. I am not in government and can't reliably use toilets.
Yet I am responsible for doing fascism while Labour hold no responsibility despite them clearing having power?!?
Labour are in government they can make policy. I am not in government and can't reliably use toilets.
Yet I am responsible for doing fascism while Labour hold no responsibility despite them clearing having power?!?
May 2, 2025 at 9:17 AM
When I see people argue this point I'm always struck by how power is flattened.
Labour are in government they can make policy. I am not in government and can't reliably use toilets.
Yet I am responsible for doing fascism while Labour hold no responsibility despite them clearing having power?!?
Labour are in government they can make policy. I am not in government and can't reliably use toilets.
Yet I am responsible for doing fascism while Labour hold no responsibility despite them clearing having power?!?
Reposted by Robyn Schreibke
When I talk about transphobia operating on the logics of abuse scaled up to the communal or societal level, this is what I mean.
"Look how much it sucks to be trans, because I made it that way. You should just desist, because if you insist on it, I'm going to have to hurt you so much more."
"Look how much it sucks to be trans, because I made it that way. You should just desist, because if you insist on it, I'm going to have to hurt you so much more."
I'm not kidding. That's the fucking argument. "Kids will be harmed by the policy we rammed through once they grow up, so do conversion therapy on them."
May 1, 2025 at 12:45 PM
When I talk about transphobia operating on the logics of abuse scaled up to the communal or societal level, this is what I mean.
"Look how much it sucks to be trans, because I made it that way. You should just desist, because if you insist on it, I'm going to have to hurt you so much more."
"Look how much it sucks to be trans, because I made it that way. You should just desist, because if you insist on it, I'm going to have to hurt you so much more."
Reposted by Robyn Schreibke
The UK EHRC have always been like this BTW.
As was it's predecessor organisations.
It's always been a minimal attempt to meet international standards.
While actually upholding privilege.
Like it early 2010s they were bailing on muslims
In 2019 they were investigating anti-white racism.
As was it's predecessor organisations.
It's always been a minimal attempt to meet international standards.
While actually upholding privilege.
Like it early 2010s they were bailing on muslims
In 2019 they were investigating anti-white racism.
May 1, 2025 at 7:27 AM
The UK EHRC have always been like this BTW.
As was it's predecessor organisations.
It's always been a minimal attempt to meet international standards.
While actually upholding privilege.
Like it early 2010s they were bailing on muslims
In 2019 they were investigating anti-white racism.
As was it's predecessor organisations.
It's always been a minimal attempt to meet international standards.
While actually upholding privilege.
Like it early 2010s they were bailing on muslims
In 2019 they were investigating anti-white racism.
My girlfriend signed off on me doing the same. As long as I take a weapon
I will fuck the chaser husbands of every "gender-critical" woman and ruin their marriages so help me god.
April 18, 2025 at 6:55 AM
My girlfriend signed off on me doing the same. As long as I take a weapon
Reposted by Robyn Schreibke
One thing that I think we all need to realise is that a not insignificant number of cis people see discrimination as a righteous punishment they get to dole out for the crime of being a tranny.
That is also not true, by the way?
Para 236 pretty explicitly lays out how bouncing trans men from a women's space wouldn't count as sex discrimination, owing to their "masculine attributes".
The opinion is hypocritical and happy to enforce a double standard for the sake of upholding cissexism.
Para 236 pretty explicitly lays out how bouncing trans men from a women's space wouldn't count as sex discrimination, owing to their "masculine attributes".
The opinion is hypocritical and happy to enforce a double standard for the sake of upholding cissexism.
people have already started talking about us only as a problem, “this means testosteroned trans men now access women’s spaces”
IT MEANS WE ARE WOMEN
THATS BAD
FOCUS ON THAT FIRST
YOU FUCKING PRICKS
IT MEANS WE ARE WOMEN
THATS BAD
FOCUS ON THAT FIRST
YOU FUCKING PRICKS
April 16, 2025 at 4:39 PM
One thing that I think we all need to realise is that a not insignificant number of cis people see discrimination as a righteous punishment they get to dole out for the crime of being a tranny.
Reposted by Robyn Schreibke
That is also not true, by the way?
Para 236 pretty explicitly lays out how bouncing trans men from a women's space wouldn't count as sex discrimination, owing to their "masculine attributes".
The opinion is hypocritical and happy to enforce a double standard for the sake of upholding cissexism.
Para 236 pretty explicitly lays out how bouncing trans men from a women's space wouldn't count as sex discrimination, owing to their "masculine attributes".
The opinion is hypocritical and happy to enforce a double standard for the sake of upholding cissexism.
people have already started talking about us only as a problem, “this means testosteroned trans men now access women’s spaces”
IT MEANS WE ARE WOMEN
THATS BAD
FOCUS ON THAT FIRST
YOU FUCKING PRICKS
IT MEANS WE ARE WOMEN
THATS BAD
FOCUS ON THAT FIRST
YOU FUCKING PRICKS
April 16, 2025 at 4:16 PM
That is also not true, by the way?
Para 236 pretty explicitly lays out how bouncing trans men from a women's space wouldn't count as sex discrimination, owing to their "masculine attributes".
The opinion is hypocritical and happy to enforce a double standard for the sake of upholding cissexism.
Para 236 pretty explicitly lays out how bouncing trans men from a women's space wouldn't count as sex discrimination, owing to their "masculine attributes".
The opinion is hypocritical and happy to enforce a double standard for the sake of upholding cissexism.
Reposted by Robyn Schreibke
I mean
The UK legal opinion just straight up is the best demonstration of my third-sexing thesis.
You are human, broodmare, or gender-freak-to-discard.
The particularities of our transition matter less than the fact that we have "chosen" to be degendered by patriarchy.
The UK legal opinion just straight up is the best demonstration of my third-sexing thesis.
You are human, broodmare, or gender-freak-to-discard.
The particularities of our transition matter less than the fact that we have "chosen" to be degendered by patriarchy.
April 16, 2025 at 4:19 PM
I mean
The UK legal opinion just straight up is the best demonstration of my third-sexing thesis.
You are human, broodmare, or gender-freak-to-discard.
The particularities of our transition matter less than the fact that we have "chosen" to be degendered by patriarchy.
The UK legal opinion just straight up is the best demonstration of my third-sexing thesis.
You are human, broodmare, or gender-freak-to-discard.
The particularities of our transition matter less than the fact that we have "chosen" to be degendered by patriarchy.
Reposted by Robyn Schreibke
We really need people to stop saying it's "unworkable". The costs of its unworkability will be paid by increasing trans women's precarity and vulnerability to sudden legal and economic sanction.
The system does not need to be coherent if it externalises the risks and costs of policing on to us.
The system does not need to be coherent if it externalises the risks and costs of policing on to us.
April 16, 2025 at 12:46 PM
We really need people to stop saying it's "unworkable". The costs of its unworkability will be paid by increasing trans women's precarity and vulnerability to sudden legal and economic sanction.
The system does not need to be coherent if it externalises the risks and costs of policing on to us.
The system does not need to be coherent if it externalises the risks and costs of policing on to us.
Reposted by Robyn Schreibke
they spend maybe like five sentences out of 88 pages max even acknowledging that discrimination on the basis of transness exists. it's absurd the backflips they do to almost exclusively deploy cis-passing trans people in their thought experiments
April 16, 2025 at 10:44 AM
they spend maybe like five sentences out of 88 pages max even acknowledging that discrimination on the basis of transness exists. it's absurd the backflips they do to almost exclusively deploy cis-passing trans people in their thought experiments
Reposted by Robyn Schreibke
It's less that we're being exiled for being men but that the vast majority of trans women's oppression is calling us men and applying a presumption of male status on us (which the court deliberately ignores) when it is convenient to deny us access to sex discrimination protections we face as trans.
i have ten pages left but the whole thing is basically like this, lmao. "we're exiling trans women from society for being men and we're exiling trans men from society for being trans." you guys i found where 4chan migrated to
April 16, 2025 at 10:33 AM
It's less that we're being exiled for being men but that the vast majority of trans women's oppression is calling us men and applying a presumption of male status on us (which the court deliberately ignores) when it is convenient to deny us access to sex discrimination protections we face as trans.
Just got off from my GRS check up call. Apparently I have an excellent vag. Much better healed than usual.
Then I hear that the Supreme Court decision.
Being trans really is elation followed by a kick in the teeth.
Then I hear that the Supreme Court decision.
Being trans really is elation followed by a kick in the teeth.
April 16, 2025 at 9:22 AM
Just got off from my GRS check up call. Apparently I have an excellent vag. Much better healed than usual.
Then I hear that the Supreme Court decision.
Being trans really is elation followed by a kick in the teeth.
Then I hear that the Supreme Court decision.
Being trans really is elation followed by a kick in the teeth.
Just remembered that basically every teacher report I ever had called me conscientious or a pleasure to have in class.
Extremely obvious queer coding.
Extremely obvious queer coding.
April 10, 2025 at 9:53 AM
Just remembered that basically every teacher report I ever had called me conscientious or a pleasure to have in class.
Extremely obvious queer coding.
Extremely obvious queer coding.
I will never not be annoyed that the beauty place in town called Doll Parts isn't a trans frm coop.
How is the allowed?
How is the allowed?
April 10, 2025 at 8:35 AM
I will never not be annoyed that the beauty place in town called Doll Parts isn't a trans frm coop.
How is the allowed?
How is the allowed?
It is sunny and my freckles have returned 😊
April 9, 2025 at 2:05 PM
It is sunny and my freckles have returned 😊
Reposted by Robyn Schreibke
It shouldn't be hard for a cabinet minister to condemn child abuse and take action on it. And yet @rthonwesstreeting.bsky.social seems oddly reluctant.
Chilli Sauce in Mascara: Wes Streeting's complicity in conversion abuse
Chili sauce in mascara: Wes Streeting's complicity in conversion abuse
Multiple attempts have been made by Trans Safety Network (TSN) to talk to Wes Streeting and the Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC) regarding serious safeguarding concerns about a group influ...
transsafety.network
April 8, 2025 at 7:13 AM
It shouldn't be hard for a cabinet minister to condemn child abuse and take action on it. And yet @rthonwesstreeting.bsky.social seems oddly reluctant.
Reposted by Robyn Schreibke
“boys feel isolated and lonely as they grow up”
the media and political classes discuss this serious problem very seriously
“trans kids feel isolated and lonely as they grow up”
the media and political classes unite in fury because trans kids shouldn’t be allowed to grow up at all
the media and political classes discuss this serious problem very seriously
“trans kids feel isolated and lonely as they grow up”
the media and political classes unite in fury because trans kids shouldn’t be allowed to grow up at all
March 31, 2025 at 11:24 AM
“boys feel isolated and lonely as they grow up”
the media and political classes discuss this serious problem very seriously
“trans kids feel isolated and lonely as they grow up”
the media and political classes unite in fury because trans kids shouldn’t be allowed to grow up at all
the media and political classes discuss this serious problem very seriously
“trans kids feel isolated and lonely as they grow up”
the media and political classes unite in fury because trans kids shouldn’t be allowed to grow up at all