You know that they’ll stop? No.

They can fight back by organizing for policies their mega donors continually block, like Medicare for All.

This isn’t fighting back.

The gerrymandering will only entrench the neoliberals into their seats.

In this line of thinking, he only would become a dictator after the midterms. If you believe that’s who he is, he has the keys right now.

Democratic principles aren’t dumb. And eroding them is extremely dangerous.

No, that’s not the takeaway. Please read again.

Then in July, the conversation became “the only way Democrats can compete for the House is to gerrymander along partisan lines.” This narrative was led by Governor Newsom, hardly a progressive.

Don’t get distracted. Fight for better.

This isn’t ‘messy’ and she’s not being a hater, this is healthy.

The point is to continue to move in the direction of justice. Sometimes that looks different in different scenarios.

Coalition politics can work when there are mutually agreed upon red lines.

Should he have said good things about Israel’s genocide while being bothered by reporters every day? No.

Same thing here.

It’s a harmful comment to the movement.

What they deserve is the opportunity to organize for better without a popular, supposedly progressive figure in the party throwing cold water on the idea that the Speaker could be someone who isn’t funding genocide, defending folks involved with Epstein, and standing in the way of Medicare for All.

Maybe New Yorkers can afford a Jeffries speakership, but that’s a luxury.

Folks in Cleveland can’t afford it, folks in the south can’t afford it.

This is not about a primary, but his spot in Congressional leadership.

This comment is detrimental to the path towards progress for all Americans, those who are struggling under conservative local and state governments and look to the federal government to pass legislation to better their lives.