Jamie ᱬ
LightNews LightNews
banner
lostboyj.bsky.social
Jamie ᱬ
@lostboyj.bsky.social
140 followers 78 following 1.6K posts
Jamie. Krakoa Was For Lovers.
He/Him.
Posts Replies Media Videos
lostboyj.bsky.social
Got my first Gambit MVP!
December 11, 2025 at 11:13 PM
lostboyj.bsky.social
Fortnite made the Lego Ninjago characters human and made this one a twink.
December 11, 2025 at 10:25 PM
lostboyj.bsky.social
Oh, I know it’s huge…👀
December 11, 2025 at 8:36 PM
lostboyj.bsky.social
You’d think the company that spent DECADES doing so much to protect ‘character integrity’ including refusing characters to be on sick kid’s gravestones would realise this is going to go very very badly.
catsuka.bsky.social Catsuka @catsuka.bsky.social · 11h
Disney will allow its characters to be used in Sora AI video generator and will make a $1 billion investment in OpenAI......
thewaltdisneycompany.com/disney-opena...
December 11, 2025 at 7:37 PM
Reposted by Jamie ᱬ
jugheadjonzz.bsky.social
AI will never be able to replicate the work of true artists.
Milo addresses an attentive Tarzan in Mr. X Toon's "Tarzan and Milo".
December 11, 2025 at 3:41 PM
Reposted by Jamie ᱬ
thedamnthinguy.com
decided to stop being a coward and cracked open my copics I bought almost two years ago

idk how traditional artists do it, this is insanely hard lol
December 10, 2025 at 8:52 PM
Reposted by Jamie ᱬ
lucianovecchio.bsky.social
Wiccan!
Using a free moment to sketch the awesome new costume designed by Lucas Werneck for Wiccan: Witches Road
December 10, 2025 at 8:14 PM
lostboyj.bsky.social
Husband got a new sticker printer at work so I got some new stickers for my tablet. Sorry @travistruant.bsky.social
December 10, 2025 at 10:06 PM
lostboyj.bsky.social
The way the last episode of Stranger Things is going to happen on the 31st and a bunch of delusional stans who fetishise queer men are going to go into the new year crashing out and claiming ‘bad writing’ because Mike isn’t gay & their delusion ship isn’t canon.
December 10, 2025 at 5:32 PM
Reposted by Jamie ᱬ
jugheadjonzz.bsky.social
I cannot fathom those who have never grown out of Harry Potter, the thirty-somethings who dress up as school kids and make loving a shallow kids' book series by a mouldering nazi their personality.

If you must fixate on kids' lit, read Moomin. It's anti-fascist and you'll make much cooler friends.
Snufkin from the Moomin stories is playing his accordion and looking at a procession marching over the hills. He says "Poor fools". Snufkin, smoking a pipe, saying "corrupt them to the Moomin way of life!"
December 10, 2025 at 11:14 AM
lostboyj.bsky.social
If you’re Scottish, make sure you Vote Green. 💚
maggiechapman.bsky.social Maggie Chapman MSP (she/her) @maggiechapman.bsky.social · 2d
We must #ChangeTheNarrative!

Dr Beth Upton was fully acquitted of all wrongdoing in yesterday’s Employment Tribunal decision. Yet she has been vilified by a toxic & poisonous media for months.
It must stop!

Congratulations, and solidarity, to you, Beth!
December 10, 2025 at 6:40 AM
lostboyj.bsky.social
The introduction of the Maximoff twins was the superior post credits scene in the MCU.
December 9, 2025 at 11:04 PM
Reposted by Jamie ᱬ
scottfree.bsky.social
*heavy breathing*
December 9, 2025 at 9:16 PM
Reposted by Jamie ᱬ
egorodriguez.com
Character artwork I did for 'The Lookout's Ghost.
Paranormal MM romance by @author.aknightley .
Here are some sketches and alternatives ideas.
If you are an author or publisher interested in some editorial work I will be taking commissions again in January. #mmromance #art
Illustration of two people in the forest are night with a lamp Sketches-Illustration of two people in the forest are night with a lamp Illustration of two people in the forest are night with a lamp Sketch of two people kissing
December 9, 2025 at 7:51 PM
lostboyj.bsky.social
Early Christmas present from the husband cause it’s cold and windy AF in Scotland. It’s Billy’s jumper from Agatha All Along!
December 9, 2025 at 10:18 PM
lostboyj.bsky.social
It’s wild how Terfs are celebrating it as a victory when the only thing Peggie ‘won’ was that the NHS maybe didn’t handle the complaint in a timely manner. Meanwhile she’s exposed herself as an abusive racist bigoted bully just to lose nearly every claim.
jugheadjonzz.bsky.social Jughead J'onzz @jugheadjonzz.bsky.social · 2d
No one:

UK tabloids, the day after Sandie Peggie - the transphobic, racist nurse who compared the victims of the 2022 Pakistan floods to a bowl of coco pops, joked about posting bacon through the letterbox of a local mosque and was found to have harassed a trans colleague - lost her case:
Sandie Peggie standing in front of the Scottish Parliament. The title banner from Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf is placed over the photo. It reads "My Struggle, My Battle, Mein Kampf".
December 9, 2025 at 8:50 PM
Reposted by Jamie ᱬ
maggiechapman.bsky.social
We must #ChangeTheNarrative!

Dr Beth Upton was fully acquitted of all wrongdoing in yesterday’s Employment Tribunal decision. Yet she has been vilified by a toxic & poisonous media for months.
It must stop!

Congratulations, and solidarity, to you, Beth!
December 9, 2025 at 2:31 PM
Reposted by Jamie ᱬ
mimmymum.bsky.social
Remember when Helen Joyce was called out as "not an expert" by Australian courts - Now Maya Forstater has been told the same in the Peggie judgment! 👏👏👏

The judgement states outright that the evidence submitted by her & Sex Matters was “not skilled evidence.”

This is the Tribunal’s exact wording!
Highlighted paragraph: Evidence from Ms Forstater and Mx Valentine 1038. We turn to address the evidence from Ms Forstater and Mx Valentine, which the parties had described as “research evidence”. That is not, so far as we are aware, a term of law. Nothing was cited to support the use of that term. It is not skilled evidence as explained below, and the parties did not suggest that either witness was skilled or expert in that sense. It was not necessarily inadmissible, given the terms of Rule 41, and until read and considered the extent to which it might be relevant could not be assessed, but the weight to attach to it was a different consideration Highlighted sections: 1040. In many respects the evidence in the statements was more in the nature of material for the public debate on wider issues as to what the law should be, and on occasion it appeared to us to be polemic, rather than evidence relevant to the issues at an Employment Tribunal. 1041. Opinion evidence was addressed in Walker and Walker on Evidence, Fifth Edition (“Walker”), which explained the distinction between evidence of fact, and of belief or opinion. Opinion evidence may be led from what Walker describes as an ordinary witness (the classification of witnesses is between ordinary and skilled), and examples of that are given. Ms Forstater 1042. The statement from Ms Forstater was not presented as impartial evidence, but specifically as one given in support of the claimant. It had at paragraph 10 an argument as to facts, of which Ms Forstater said that she was certain. They are however we consider not facts, but expressions of her opinion. The assertion at 10 (b) for example was “Sex is in general readily perceptible and is salient to other people.” That we consider cannot be other than her opinion, for which no support from any document in the Supplementary Bundle appeared to be referred to in her written witness statement. It was contradicted by other evidence, and the terms of a Note issued by EJ Tinnion on 5 January 2025 in relation to the second respondent. It did not appear to be an assertion related to the second respondent in particular, but as a more general proposition. 1043. The assertion at (d) had a further series of propositions which were opinions although presented as facts. If the 1992 Regulations, then as discussed they are not within this Tribunal’s jurisdiction, and the comment appears to be an argument over the policy of the law, or how the law should be interpreted, neither of which are relevant evidence before us. 1044. The sub-paragraphs include, by way of example, (ii) “women are in general more fearful of men than men … Highlighted sections: That is again an expression of opinion without cross reference to any document in the Supplementary Bundle. Sub-paragraph (v) was “unless rules about single-sex spaces are clearly stated and enforced it leaves women open to risk of sexual harassment and assault, and makes these spaces feel unsafe.” That again is an expression of opinion. The witness statement purports to expand on the comments at paragraph 10 stating that the facts stated are true. In our view they are not reliable as evidence from a person not a skilled witness on the propositions that are advanced. 1045. Where there was reference to documentation it is in our view both partial and incomplete. Part of it is based on research undertaken by Sex Matters, an organisation of which she is the Chief Executive Officer. It is a campaigning organisation, as set out in paragraph 4. There is an obvious risk that that research is impacted by the nature of it, which is not suggested to be an independent academic study .... In our view it would not be dealing with a case fairly or justly to rely on expressions of opinion from a person campaigning on one side of the argument on such an issue. We did not consider that the case of Connor on which the claimant founded, cited above and which indicated that in some situations evidence which was not expert in nature could be sufficient, was applicable to such a matter. 1047. Our review of the literature referred to by Ms Forstater reveals that the broad generalisations she seeks to take from it are not sufficiently supported by the document or document founded on, both from the terms of the document and the other documents in relation to the same broad issue, to be treated as reliable evidence.
December 9, 2025 at 10:36 AM
Reposted by Jamie ᱬ
dhothersall.bsky.social
Jackie Baillie, Mel Ward, Claire Baker, Joani Reid and Anas Sarwar all publicly backed Sandie Peggie in her employment tribunal case.

Yesterday that tribunal ruled that Peggie unlawfully harassed Beth Upton.

Scottish Labour must now apologise to Dr Upton for this catastrophic failure of judgement.
Screenshot of a Tweet from Jackie Baillie (@jackiebmsp) on Jul 23 2025: The SNP should focus on getting NHS waiting times down rather than wasting taxpayers’ money on tribunals attacking hardworking staff [link to scotsman.com: Here's where the blame for NHS Fife-Sandie Peggie case really lies] Screenshot of a tweet from Melanie Ward MP (@melanie_ward) on Jul 21, 2025: This morning @clairebakermsp & I met with Sandie Peggie, who I have spoken in support of in Parliament. Sandie has 30 years’ service as a nurse at the Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy & should never have had to take legal action to uphold her right to change in a single sex space. Screenshot of a tweet from Joani Reid MP (@JoaniReid) on 8th Dec 2025: What happened to Sandie Peggie was a disgrace. Her harassment has been enabled by a warped NHS culture and fostered by a Scottish Government that refused to listen to women’s concerns. It allowed the ideology of a small group of unrepresentative activists spread like wildfire through our institutions. Those in NHS Fife who played any part in this must be accountable and I struggle to see how they stay in post. They have wasted masses of NHS money on their trans rights crusade. Enough is enough. Screenshot of a tweet from Holyrood Sources (@HolyroodSources) on 18 Feb 2025: EXCLUSIVE: Anas Sarwar and Jackie Baillie say they support nurse Sandie Peggie. The Scottish Labour leader tells us: "Knowing what we know now, we would not have supported the [Gender Recognition Reform] bill." @CalumAM @akmaciver @geoffaberdein
December 9, 2025 at 8:47 AM
lostboyj.bsky.social
It’s always worth noting that for every judgment that Terfs claim as a ‘win’, there’s always the caveat of a legal professional telling them that while they’re legally entitled to their views, they are repugnant and make society worse for having them.
goodlawproject.org Jolyon Maugham KC @goodlawproject.org · 2d
An important point to come out of the Sandie Peggie case is that 'gender critical' employees can't take matters into their own hands and confront trans employees. If they do that it is likely to be harassment/ bullying/ a hate incident.
So far as her other comments are concerned, they were impermissible manifestations of her belief and were in our view what amounted to an incident of harassment by the claimant of the second respondent related to the protected characteristic of gender reassignment, reasonably perceived by the second respondent to be so, and were a breach by the claimant of section 26 of the Act and of the Bullying and Harassment Policy. The second respondent was entitled to view the actions of the claimant in those particular regards as being such harassment, or as a “hate incident” within the policy, and the first respondent was entitled in principle to act on the complaint made, but the detail of how it did so depends on all the circumstances as more fully addressed below. The second respondent was also entitled to regard the claimant’s actions as a breach of the second respondent’s Article 8 rights, so far as the claimant’s expression of her beliefs was impermissible. 1034. We also considered that the claimant had acted deliberately to be able to challenge the second respondent whilst they were alone. What she did was to wait until other members of staff had left the changing room, and for the second respondent to leave the cubicle, before raising her own beliefs directly with the second respondent in the manner we have set out. 1035. Whilst the claimant had not been informed as promptly and in the detail we considered appropriate, and the first respondent did not consider whether to revoke permission at all, the claimant did not herself raise any formal grievance under the policy. She is an experienced member of staff who had access to union advice. She knew, or ought reasonably to have known, that the first respondent having granted permission to the second respondent she required to have raised her concerns with the first respondent as the decision-maker rather than with the colleague to whom it had been granted, and in any event ought not to have done so in the manner that she did.
December 9, 2025 at 9:34 AM
lostboyj.bsky.social
“I NEED TO KNOW IF THE GINGERBREAD HAS A COCK!!!” Screams Susan as she’s escorted out by Morrison’s security.
sheg7.bsky.social She Guevara @sheg7.bsky.social · 3d
I'd pay good money just to see her argument for these biscuits being "biologically male"
Susan Hall on twitter: look at this nonsense, NO, they are gingerbread men Picture, Packet of 16 Morrisons Gingerbread People
December 8, 2025 at 8:59 PM
lostboyj.bsky.social
To honour Nicholas Hoult’s birthday yesterday, let’s revisit his most iconic scene that almost made me break my family’s dvd recorder by watching it over and over and over again.
December 8, 2025 at 7:55 PM
Reposted by Jamie ᱬ
scottfree.bsky.social
ICEMAN: …and then I hear, from the other guy, “Well, you sure got a pretty little mouth on you, snowman.” So I put -

ANGEL: Bobby, this is not an appropriate eulogy for Jean’s funeral.

ICEMAN: Really? I left out the bit about the Sharpie in this version.
December 8, 2025 at 5:19 PM
Reposted by Jamie ᱬ
thecappyhamham.bsky.social
Bobby Drake was probably the easiest since i just put him in an Emma Frost uniform. here’s canonically gay Iceman dressed as a slutty hero.
MCUm slutty Bobby Drake MCUm slurry Iceman
December 3, 2025 at 1:59 AM
Reposted by Jamie ᱬ
stephen-mcdermott.com
Im a bit obsessed you might say. Anyway here’s some totally official totally not fan merch from yours truly 😉 But who was I to say no? Pins and prints up on the shop now #wedidntevenkiss #fuckyouhollander #fuckyourozanoff #jacobtierney #gamechangers #hudsonwilliams #connorstories #heatedrivalry
December 5, 2025 at 5:08 AM