De Tomaso Panera
LightNews LightNews
banner
griffonatrix.bsky.social
De Tomaso Panera
@griffonatrix.bsky.social
1.1K followers 420 following 4.2K posts
Artist, dog, lover, and avid reader.
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by De Tomaso Panera
gregthemiller.bsky.social
surprising
screenshot of a bluesky search for “bojill horsewoman” No results found for "bojill horsewoman from:amutepiggy.bsky.social". Try a different search term, or read about how to use search filters.
December 8, 2025 at 3:01 AM
Reposted by De Tomaso Panera
proletkvlt.bsky.social
bsky.app/profile/prol...
proletkvlt.bsky.social proletkvlt @proletkvlt.bsky.social · Sep 14
HI WELCOME TO MY INTERNET WEB ZONE ON BLUE SKY DOT COMPUTER

MY ARTWORK

MYRMIDON: A SCI-FI HORROR MECHA NOVEL archiveofourown.org/works/62628079

ANGUISH: AN IN-PROGRESS SCI-FANTASY THRILLER archiveofourown.org/works/70844586

HALI MANOR: A COSMIC HORROR SURREALIST YURI bsky.app/profile/prol...
December 8, 2025 at 12:24 AM
Reposted by De Tomaso Panera
samwhyte.bsky.social
TERFdom is the entrance point down a deep reactionary rabbit hole.
Quote from Hadley freeman Times Column I, however, am not. So I stand hairshirt-less by the column I wrote here 11 months ago saying it is pretty obvious ADHD and autism are being overdiagnosed, which is not Latin for “are a load of baloney”. ADHD and autism are neurological conditions and in some settings are underdiagnosed (prisons, for example). But it is not a contradiction to say they are being wildly overdiagnosed in other settings — among, say, writers who spend too long on Google. And in an era when having a label, from non-binary to ADHD, has become a lens through which people make sense of their life, just as religion once was, this is not a surprise.
December 7, 2025 at 7:39 PM
Reposted by De Tomaso Panera
alexblechman.bsky.social
Any sufficiently advanced spaceship is indistinguishable from an Embassy Suites
December 7, 2025 at 8:21 PM
griffonatrix.bsky.social
Who cares
December 7, 2025 at 9:26 PM
Reposted by De Tomaso Panera
criminalerin.bsky.social
OH THAT IS INTERESTING
Interestingly, those with household incomes of $100,000 or more were the most likely (40%) to say they’ve intentionally taken an item without scanning it. Just 17% of those making less than $30,000 said the same.
December 7, 2025 at 9:11 PM
griffonatrix.bsky.social
I don't know how to explain to you that we live in a society.
December 7, 2025 at 7:56 PM
griffonatrix.bsky.social
Ohhh you're one of *those* weirdos who doesn't believe in anything
December 7, 2025 at 6:08 PM