Fed Up Toby
LightNews LightNews
feduptoby.bsky.social
Fed Up Toby
@feduptoby.bsky.social
84 followers 94 following 1.1K posts
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by Fed Up Toby
alicemydaughter.bsky.social
I've written a blog aimed at cis ppl, on the recent revelations of rising trans suicide rates since NHS England removed gender affirming care for u18s, in particular about my involvement with trying to seek the truth and the trauma the gaslighting by Appleby, Streeting, Cass and the media causes.
Trans youth suicide - the truth we've always known. What it means to me and what I've been doing about it.
Last week Queer AF broke a story that revealed the suicide rate in trans under eighteens is around fourteen times higher than you might expect from census data.As the parent of Alice a trans woman who...
www.carolinelitman.com
February 7, 2026 at 5:38 PM
Reposted by Fed Up Toby
jaytoddgla.bsky.social
📣 Today @felicitycallard.bsky.social and I have published the first peer-reviewed response to the 'Sullivan Review' of research and data on sex and gender.

doi.org/10.1111/tran...

The Review could threaten trans rights and inclusion, erode academic freedom, and undermine research quality.
Graphic reading 'the UK Government-commissioned 'Sullivan Review' of sex and gender in data and research collection threatens British research and trans inclusion. Here's why.'
February 3, 2026 at 9:13 AM
Reposted by Fed Up Toby
hleehurley.com
Just leaving this here

www.thenational.scot/news/2545164...
Wes Streeting defends Lord Peter Mandelson's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein
WES Streeting has defended Lord Peter Mandelson’s relationship with the late Jeffrey Epstein after it was revealed the Labour peer called the…
www.thenational.scot
November 13, 2025 at 10:58 AM
Reposted by Fed Up Toby
katmabu.bsky.social
I'm Kat Abughazaleh and I approve this message.
January 31, 2026 at 4:53 PM
Reposted by Fed Up Toby
goodlawproject.org
I can confirm that Sex Matters has been refused permission to bring its anti-democratic, exclusionary, and bigoted challenge to the inclusive space at Hampstead Ponds. More to follow.
January 29, 2026 at 11:43 AM
Reposted by Fed Up Toby
bearlypolitics.co.uk
Is London really a fiery dystopian hellscape?

Is Islam calling for Dog Bans?

Do we only use 10% of our Brains?

The answer is - no, no and also no.

Episode 3 of Bear and Monk Debunk addresses both of these persistent myths with facts, context and just a mild bit of swearing.

Out now.
Bear and Monk Debunk #3: London and Dog Bans
Is London an irredeemable fiery tip, and are there calls for dogs to be banned? Both these topics are discussed in detail this week.
www.bearlypolitics.co.uk
January 26, 2026 at 4:03 PM
Reposted by Fed Up Toby
brokenbottleboy.bsky.social
NEW| Reporting on the Minneapolis ICE shooting, BBC News is soaked to the skin but still not sure if it's raining...

brokenbottleboy.substack.com/p/reporting-...
Reporting on the Minneapolis ICE shooting, BBC News is soaked to the skin but still not sure if it's raining...
In an attempt to maintain balance, the BBC is letting obvious lies go unchallenged.
brokenbottleboy.substack.com
January 26, 2026 at 10:40 AM
Reposted by Fed Up Toby
theabigailthorn.bsky.social
January 25, 2026 at 3:48 PM
Reposted by Fed Up Toby
joxley.jmoxley.co.uk
Appears this is also true for fascism.
January 24, 2026 at 3:56 PM
Reposted by Fed Up Toby
liamthorp.bsky.social
Worth remembering when looking at the horrific scenes in the US right now that both Reform and the Tories have pledged to bring in ICE-style organisations to the UK if they win power
January 24, 2026 at 10:33 PM
Reposted by Fed Up Toby
sundersays.bsky.social
Entries are absurdly unbalanced, to favour US govt false statements, in a scenario where "sharply contested" both sides reporting would be highly inadequate

BBC are here being a real time conduit of the misinformation that they say their mission is to verify+counter
www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cj...
Minneapolis live: Man, 37, shot dead by federal agents in Minneapolis
The shooting follows days of protests in the city over the Trump administration's immigration enforcement operation.
www.bbc.co.uk
January 24, 2026 at 11:05 PM
Reposted by Fed Up Toby
theabigailthorn.bsky.social
The Cass Review isn’t worth much as a document, but it makes a hell of a dress! 👗

New Philosophy Tube in the works and folks, it’s a big one ✨👑

See more pics on my Patreon including all the looks and the live chicken we had on set 🐓

www.patreon.com/posts/148958...
Abi in an incredible dress made of old medical records and government documents
January 24, 2026 at 12:15 PM
Reposted by Fed Up Toby
robinince.bsky.social
When will this regression end? Conversion therapy? It was someone who was on the board of sex matters who played a major part in me resigning from Monkey Cage because they like to bully people into silence
Stop Sex Matters lobbying for conversion therapy In just one week, the Council of Europe will be voting to ban conversion therapy. This would be an incredibly important step to stop the rollback in the rights of LGBTQI+ people. But Sex Matters is infiltrating the vote. Sex Matters have set up a tool for transphobes to email the MPs that are on the Council, asking them to vote against a ban on this cruel practice. We have to stop this. Here's what you can do - it only takes two minutes. 4/4 Email the MPs on the Council of Europe and let them know they don't have to bend down to Sex Matter's transphobic threats. They can stand up for what's right. Comment to get the tool in your DMs. We only have a week but, together, we can stop hate.
January 23, 2026 at 5:29 PM
Reposted by Fed Up Toby
jessasatomp.bsky.social
This week, an X user created an AI video of me being chloroformed and prepared for rape.

Victims are told it's not real and they're getting offended for no reason.

But nudification tools are weapons of sexual assault, and the harm they cause is real 👇

jessasato.substack.com/p/ai-nudific...
AI nudification: the latest weapon of violence against women and girls
In Julie Burchill’s recent article in the Spectator, Does it really matter if Grok undresses us all?, she makes the argument that those who, like me, have repeatedly had their clothes removed by socia...
jessasato.substack.com
January 23, 2026 at 11:21 AM
Reposted by Fed Up Toby
jonnysinger.bsky.social
We might have been spared one of the worst Primer Ministers in history...
January 22, 2026 at 2:49 PM
Reposted by Fed Up Toby
markgrimshawtism.bsky.social
A brief opinion on how the Labour Party have hijacked and weaponised the legacy of Brianna Ghey.
January 21, 2026 at 4:04 PM
Reposted by Fed Up Toby
robinince.bsky.social
I wrote this poem the day after Renee Good was murdered - it’s about how the media and politicians immediately dehumanised her. I have had a few people ask “who wrote it?” So I am putting it up again - written in anger
Media Notes for Justification of the Orphan Makers Do not be quick to put the boot in Those accused of shooting A peaceful mother in the face (three times) Her demise may well be justified Our population now is radicalised have you noticed how women often fail To even obey the voices of the male?) And this was no run of the mill "mum" She was a deviant one A lesbian And we cannot dismiss How the sapphic can put men with pistols Into a panic She may not have committed the sin of being brown But her profile page declared a pronoun! A typical trait of an enemy of the state But wait A little more She called herself a "poet" too And women like that are often shrews To take language and create a rhythm Another clue to domestic terrorism So I say again From autocue to you The world is surely a better place If we shoot love and peace and protest in the face
January 18, 2026 at 10:05 AM
Reposted by Fed Up Toby
nionwomen.bsky.social
When your entire message is one of compassion and understanding, why would you engage in hate and harmful discourse? Report, block and move on is the only way. Trans people are not a debate. We are focused on finding women who feel the same: notinourname.org.uk
Home - Not in our name
Not In our Name: Women in support of the trans+community
notinourname.org.uk
January 17, 2026 at 9:19 AM
Reposted by Fed Up Toby
profrachelgan.bsky.social
Following coverage over the weekend of Sir Paul Nurse's comments that suggested that the only reason that a Fellow should be expelled from @royalsociety.org is scientific misconduct, I have written to him to explain the risks such an attitude poses of increasing sexual harassment in STEM.
Dear Sir Paul, Re: Royal Society Code of Conduct I am sure that many scientists have written to you about the specific question of Elon Musk’s Fellowship and whether, under the Royal Society’s Code of Conduct, his retaining that Fellowship is appropriate. I will not rehash these issues. Instead, as a female scientist with extensive experience of activities aiming to increase equality, diversity and inclusion in the engineering and physical sciences sector, I am writing to you (in a personal capacity) to ask you to reconsider the statements you have recently made in this context to the UK press about the Royal Society’s Code of Conduct and how it is applied. A 2018 report from the joint National Academies of the United States of America, concluded that “sexual harassment is common in academic science, engineering, and medicine” and that “greater than 50 percent of women faculty and staff and 20–50 percent of women students encounter or experience sexually harassing conduct in academia”. This report described codes of conduct that make clear that sexual harassment is unethical and will not be tolerated as a “powerful incentive for change”. The authors also noted that sexual harassment can have significant and damaging effects on the integrity of research. In my own praxis, I have found that clear and consistently-implemented codes of conduct that address these issues make female scientists and engineers safer, and allow them to focus more effectively on their research. For codes of conduct to have such a positive effect, it is vital that sanctions for actions which transgress the code are meaningful and substantial. I was hence aghast to realise that in an interview with the Financial Times published on 9/1/26, you appear to have suggested that the Royal Society “should only expel fellows if their science proved “faulty or fraudulent or highly defective””. Moreover, in a further interview with the Guardian on 11/1/26 you suggested that the code “may need to be looked at again”, with the implication that your aim would be to remove the option of sanctions on Fellows for reasons not strictly related to faults or defects in their research. I suggest that changing the Royal Society’s code of conduct so that the likelihood of serious sanctions for sexual harassment is reduced, would directly endanger women who interact with the Royal Society at events or otherwise, and would provide a licence to harass to the already powerful people on whom the Society bestows fellowship. The implications of your words - that under your leadership the only infringements of the code which are likely to receive the sanction of the Fellowship being removed are those related to research misconduct - already risk empowering harassers. You stated, in the Financial Times interview, that “there’s many bad people around, but they have made scientific advances”. Given this awareness of the possibility of bad actors in our scientific community, it is wholly irresponsible to suggest that the Royal Society would not act to sanction these people if they harass more vulnerable scientists. I am hence writing to request that you retract any suggestion that the Society’s Code of Conduct should be changed so that the only reason a Fellow might be sanctioned by the removal of their Fellowship is “faulty or fraudulent or highly defective” research. This action is necessary to safeguard female scientists, a requirement placed on the Society by safeguarding legislation and UK statutory guidance. Yours sincerely, Professor Rachel A. Oliver.
January 12, 2026 at 8:59 AM
Reposted by Fed Up Toby
zoejardiniere.bsky.social
We need urgent DEYANKIFICATION in the UK to end our dependence on the Fascistic Trump regime!

@ukstoptrump.bsky.social
January 10, 2026 at 11:49 AM
Reposted by Fed Up Toby
skepchick.org
In case you’re wondering whether the pro-ICE reactions to Renee Nicole Good’s murder are natural, here’s a comment that was just left on my video. My video about anti-transgender bias at the BBC. I haven’t made a video about Good yet.
youtu.be/pWm3dK8tPto
B @BFthoughts • 1 hour ago In this video, it seems obvious why an officer could fear she was going to run into him with her vehicle. Wow! I hadn't seen this angle. He had a reason to feel threatened. It is done. :
January 10, 2026 at 5:07 PM
Reposted by Fed Up Toby
goodlawproject.org
Transphobia: the engine that pulls the train of fascism.
jamesbloodworth.bsky.social James Bloodworth @jamesbloodworth.bsky.social · Jan 9
Graham's all about 'protecting women'
January 9, 2026 at 4:52 PM
Reposted by Fed Up Toby
bengoldsborough.bsky.social
If a human was being paid to create this material, we’d rightly throw the book at them. So why should X get a free pass?

Fine them to the hilt and if they won’t comply, shut it down. We wouldn’t tolerate this offline. Why online?

www.bbc.co.uk/news/article... 2/2
Elon Musk's Grok AI image editing limited to paid users after deepfakes
It comes after government urged Ofcom to use all its powers – up to and including an effective ban – against X.
www.bbc.co.uk
January 9, 2026 at 9:13 AM
Reposted by Fed Up Toby
louisehaighmp.bsky.social
I call on my party and my government to remove themselves entirely from X and communicate with the public where they actually participate online and can be protected from such illegality.
January 8, 2026 at 12:31 PM