57?? and we’re supposed to just take their word on that??

we do not WANT to tag individual devs in shit like this. we do not WANT to inundate you and jay with criticism directly.

we are BEGGING you all to have a functional comms strategy as a Product, not individual people who work here.

I also think GenAI summaries of conversations and personal emails are fucking wack and disrespectful

Either you have time to genuinely engage with what someone said or you don’t

well, a promise is a promise after all

it's like you can't even recommend people spend more time in Reno these days

There is absolutely no person whose presence in that conspiracy could possibly make me say "they're too important to prosecute" or whatever. Give them a trial, because due process is important, and once they're found guilty, we can have a parade between the courthouse and the prison.

And given how hard they're fighting against the release and how long they've stalled in every way possible, there's no way the information is anything other than utterly damning to the President, or to people the President is deeply beholden to, or both.

Fiat justitia ruat caelum.

Okay, well, if moderation is going to take place entirely without regard to context, it has to be a much lighter hand. 72 hours for a joke that would be easily discernible as a joke in context, when people are actually threatening actual harm elsewhere on bsky, doesn't seem appropriate.

She wrote it in reference to an ARTICLE ABOUT JOHNNY CASH. Referencing a famous singers most famous line in his most famous song, in response to an article about said famous singer, can in no way be seriously perceived as a threat.

If you honestly believe Sarah Kendzior was legitimately threatening to shoot the author of the article she was commenting on, I worry about your ability to navigate the world safely.

On the other hand maybe you've missed your calling as a cop. Have you ever mistaken a bag of Doritos for a gun?