Former journo & audience guy, now solicitor
They’re still framing policy through a 90’s/2000’s lens, then ending up in a bind when it doesn’t play out as planned
A few points:
• idea that the OBR said on Oct 31 Reeves was already meeting her target by £4b isn't really the full picture - fcast excluded the welfare u-turns since March (some media have pointed that out, others not)
They’re still framing policy through a 90’s/2000’s lens, then ending up in a bind when it doesn’t play out as planned
Top work all around. These are not easy case studies to find.
Top work all around. These are not easy case studies to find.
No.10 could definitely drive this via regulation and policy around legacy and social media. But in the absence of that, what is there?
No.10 could definitely drive this via regulation and policy around legacy and social media. But in the absence of that, what is there?
It feels like a game from a different era – and not in a good way
It feels like a game from a different era – and not in a good way
w/ Dan Boffey, @drblacklock.bsky.social
w/ Dan Boffey, @drblacklock.bsky.social
@barrons.com $NVDA
@firstadopter.bsky.social
www.barrons.com/articles/nvi...
These people are as detached from reality as they are their morals – they just can’t see it
archive.ph/RlXPj
These people are as detached from reality as they are their morals – they just can’t see it
I do understand the hesitancy, but it feels antiquated that we still regard employees in their 50s as 'old'
I do understand the hesitancy, but it feels antiquated that we still regard employees in their 50s as 'old'
8 times out of 10, when people use this they're actually referring to cronyism
8 times out of 10, when people use this they're actually referring to cronyism