Adam Bell
banner
adambell.bsky.social
Adam Bell
@adambell.bsky.social
"Former energy czar" - the Guardian. "Energy big brain" - Politico.
Technology agnostic heat decarbonisation is the way to go, because then you get people doing things like this!
Incredible story!

And before anyone comments... N.b. the mini data centre in question is *not* running AI.

"they swapped their gas boiler for a HeatHub – a small data centre containing more than 500 computers."

www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
'I heat my Essex home with a data centre in the shed'
www.bbc.co.uk
November 16, 2025 at 9:10 AM
how are they so bad at this. how. how.
Aaaaaand gilt market hates it
November 14, 2025 at 8:41 AM
NEW PAPER: ACTUALLY DOING FUSION

I am intensely cynical about most things, but I've seen enough innovation now to believe that we are actually not that far off from making fusion happen. Our paper today lays out how. /1

www.stonehavenglobal.com/future_for_f...
Future for Fusion Roadmap Commercial Fusion with FLARE
www.stonehavenglobal.com
November 13, 2025 at 3:02 PM
So true. My ancestral voices are telling me to steal sheep from the English and race back over the border. As a result I am always doing that.
“They heard ancestral voices” WTAF
November 13, 2025 at 1:05 PM
The implication of this, of course, is that a liberal society requires pro-cognitive mores and means of imparting or enforcing them. I don't know any politician who would be willing to say, "People participating in public discourse should be obliged to think about it."
"The populist thrives in an environment where people act on their intuitions; so does the scammer. This doesn’t mean every populist is a con artist, but it does mean that they are likely to package their message in a similar way" on.ft.com/49j3ND2

By @timharford.ft.com

Vindicates a 2015 tweet! 1/
How populism became popular
It appeals more to a way of thinking than to a set of ideas — but is it just wrong?
on.ft.com
November 13, 2025 at 7:26 AM
It is unclear whether many on the right understand why we have institutions. It is actually rather rare that the positive case for liberal institutionalism is put forward, and much more frequent that institutions are condemned for being out of touch with the public in some way. /1
The impossible dream some people on the British right are chasing is that you can have a BBC News operation that retreats from detail and expertise, that takes dictation from the government, but this will only create incompetence and failure when it suits you:
To fix the BBC, focus on competence and cash
Corporation fails to learn from criticism, while politicians have consciously reduced its scope for quality journalism
www.ft.com
November 10, 2025 at 2:44 PM
Reposted by Adam Bell
The time to confront it was 20 years ago but those of us who argued for it were dismissed or ridiculed.
China was going to be coaxed into the liberal democratic world by trade and the Olympics.
Didn’t happen and was never going to.
Few G7 policy-makers seem to want to confront the logic of Chinese growth, that this isn't about state subsidies that can be switched off and we go back to normal, but a permanent part of the world economy that has ended western leadership.
November 10, 2025 at 7:49 AM
Reposted by Adam Bell
cooked his ass
November 10, 2025 at 6:11 AM
Reposted by Adam Bell
I’d always wondered why no one had ever published a full, detailed map of the 1960s plan to turn London into a giant web of US-style urban motorways…. It turns even the politicians and designers didn’t make one at the time. It just didn’t exist. Until now.
November 9, 2025 at 8:40 AM
Okay a nice unironic one now.
November 9, 2025 at 10:48 AM
November 9, 2025 at 9:36 AM
Reposted by Adam Bell
This video is brilliant: buff.ly/1zyTWmM

Seems a total slam dunk that owners of private jets should pay fuel duties. Doesn't it?

The answer is annoying.

Thread:
Private jets don't pay fuel tax. Now I don't either.
You pay fuel duty. Why don’t billionaires? This week, we launched WeWingAnyCar.com to help you qualify for the same tax breaks that private jets get. Because tax loopholes shouldn’t just be for…
www.youtube.com
November 8, 2025 at 9:34 AM
Reposted by Adam Bell
there's an entire sub culture of middle age men who are so impervious to other views that at no point have they ever read any of the many comments pointing out that an obsessive interest in student politics is deeply fucking creepy? anyway, this is worse.
The hatred the youth parliament gets is just so out of proportion. Can these people hear themselves. It’s creepy.
November 7, 2025 at 5:54 PM
Travelling on a train packed with Preston fans, and I wish the very best of luck to their opponents Millwall today.
November 8, 2025 at 10:24 AM
This is almost a perfect study in how complicated market rules create opportunities to do things that the rule makers did not expect. Because the incentives to find margin will always beat the incentive on the harassed bureaucrat trying to find edge cases. We should've just banned Russian oil.
November 8, 2025 at 10:14 AM
Reposted by Adam Bell
Ed Miliband is entirely right about this. There are legitimate critiques of specific climate policies, but much of the criticism is either scientifically illiterate denialism or ‘it’s just too hard’ defeatism - and often it’s both. www.theguardian.com/environment/...
‘Giving up would be a betrayal’: Miliband says 1.5C target still alive before Cop30
Exclusive: Environment secretary says global tipping points are possible as he rejects far-right climate ‘defeatism’
www.theguardian.com
November 7, 2025 at 6:41 PM
The Wilkes, "Tech founders are crippling nerds who don't understand people," theory of innovation failure.
Theory: really successful innovations were based much more on insights into consumer demand than technological supply/possibility. E.g.:
- punters would buy an EV if it were cool enough
- people will trust online shopping
- a computer in every house
- they'll provide social media content for free 1/
My own guess is that this Optimus robot is to Musk what the Metaverse is to Zuckerberg, but plenty of people much richer than me seem to think differently- on.ft.com/3LpFJV3
When will we know?
November 7, 2025 at 9:43 AM
Fellow map painters who are on the shelf about the latest iteration of the greatest map painting application: this opinion is Correct.
EU5 is very, very good. Vicously complex. Understandably buggy as a result and lacking some QoL UX bits. But that's inevitable for a game of such scope, and easily fixed over time.

I feel i have enough of a handle on the core mechanics now, so will be streaming it from about 10:30am.
November 6, 2025 at 9:30 AM
Deeply disappointed that the Saudis didn't even get far enough to create something whose ruins would be an awesome location for games and films. But still, this couldn't happen to a nicer autocrat.
NEW: The End of the Line: the centrepiece of Saudi Arabia’s Neom gigaproject - a 500m tall, 170km long wall-like building intended ultimately to house 9 million people - can’t get out of the ground, say more than 20 former Neom architects, engineers and senior executives.
ig.ft.com/saudi-neom-l...
End of The Line: how Saudi Arabia’s Neom dream unravelled
Mohammed bin Salman’s utopian city was undone by the laws of physics and finance
ig.ft.com
November 6, 2025 at 9:11 AM
NEW REPORT: POWERING HOMES, POWERING GROWTH
Taking the carbon out of heating buildings is one of the hardest parts of climate policy. Our new report starts by pointing out that while it is indeed hard, that doesn’t justify the poor performance of multiple governments in trying to tackle it. /1
November 4, 2025 at 1:13 PM
Reposted by Adam Bell
Displaced elites invoking the common people to try and reconquer their place at the top of the social and political hierarchy, innit.
October 30, 2025 at 9:29 AM
DESNZ have dropped the new Carbon Plan. I have two tests: is this legally robust, and does it have a plausible pathway for heat? /1
www.gov.uk/government/p...
Carbon budget and growth delivery plan
The Carbon Budget and Growth Delivery Plan sets out how the government meets its statutory carbon budgets and secure the benefits of this transition for people and businesses.
www.gov.uk
October 29, 2025 at 4:40 PM
Reposted by Adam Bell
FACTCHECK: The frontpage of today's Daily Telegraph has a very confused story about offshore wind, which is all sorts of wrong

It says a technical change means higher subsidies & fewer new windfarms from the upcoming AR7 auction

Oopsie!

This is the opposite of the truth 🧵
October 29, 2025 at 1:05 PM
Reposted by Adam Bell
"How 40 years of change brought globalisation without trust" - my latest long read (based on a talk given this morning) seems immediately relevant given further US-China tensions over global supply chains.

Global markets are a reality --->

ecipe.org/blog/the-new...
The New World of Trade – How 40 Years of Change Brought Globalisation Without Trust
Making sense of daily trade policy turbulence has become a major challenge. President Trump is just one part of a complex ever-changing picture.Stop the world to catch up is an understandable respons
ecipe.org
October 15, 2025 at 2:05 PM