Talila A. Lewis, Esq.
@talilalewis.bsky.social
1.2K followers 780 following 150 posts
multilingual abolitionist, artist, educator, writer, movement strategist, community lawyer | proud legacy of the Black Southern griot & recitation traditions | orator-signer-writer-storyteller | www.talilalewis.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
talilalewis.bsky.social
“Since we live under racial capitalism, settler colonialism, & white supremacy, ableism…here’s always been about…race, gender, labor/productivity/capital and dis/ability…used for generations to degrade, oppress, control, & disappear disabled & non-disabled people alike…”
truthout.org/articles/abl...
Ableism Enables All Forms of Inequity and Hampers All Liberation Efforts
Ableism has been used for generations to degrade, oppress, control and disappear disabled and nondisabled people alike.
truthout.org
Reposted by Talila A. Lewis, Esq.
mailbykite.bsky.social
This looks absolutely amazing. I cite @talilalewis.bsky.social’s work constantly (truly just cited them in a guest lecture on Friday).

This is pay what you want, October 23rd and October 30th 2025. Two consecutive Thursdays at 5p - 7p PT // 7p - 9p CT // 8p - 10p ET.
equitableforall.com
Every single time Chantal tries to educate folx about how ableism and fascism are interconnected, defensiveness abounds galore so many of you could benefit from this Pay-What-You-Can virtual Disability Justice training, featuring @talilalewis.bsky.social: www.healthjusticecommons.org/fall-politic...
Reposted by Talila A. Lewis, Esq.
brainnotonyet.bsky.social
Hey so about that whole elections thing and the reality that republicans are already blocking newly elected democrats from being sworn in a full year before the midterms.
washingtonpost.com
Column: Democratic Rep. Adelita S. Grijalva won her special election in Arizona more than two weeks ago, but House Republicans refuse to swear her in.

She believes it has to do with her stance on the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and her identity.
Column | Congresswoman-in-limbo Adelita Grijalva on the dilemma she faces
Democratic Rep. Grijalva won her special election more than two weeks ago, but House Republicans refuse to swear her into office.
www.washingtonpost.com
Reposted by Talila A. Lewis, Esq.
equitableforall.com
"Radical educator and philosopher Paulo Freire wrote, “The more radical the person is, the more fully he or she enters into reality so that, knowing it better, he or she can better transform it. This individual is not afraid to confront, to listen, to see the world unveiled.” 👊🏾👊🏾👊🏾👊🏾👊🏾👊🏾👊🏾👊🏾👊🏾
- Chapter 9
equitableforall.com
I started reading this earlier at the doctor's office, but then got home, & other priorities took precedence. Given how demoralized I feel, I am returning to it and hoping that posting quotes that resonate as I go may help me with finishing it. Channeling my past self, who read 450+ books in 2017! 🥹
A book cover is seen.

Against a background of stars, folx with held hands raised in solidarity are seen.

Text, as follows:

LET THIS RADICALIZE YOU: ORGANIZING AND THE REVOLUTION OF RECIPROCAL CARE
KELLY HAYES & MARIAME KABA

THIS IS A PROPHETIC WORK.
- NAOMI KLEIN
talilalewis.bsky.social
Love to see it. Well done chitown.
Reposted by Talila A. Lewis, Esq.
mskellymhayes.bsky.social
I donated some copies of Let This Radicalize You for distribution at an ICE watch training for folks who want to join school patrols in a nearby neighborhood. Not everyone got a copy, because 120 people showed up for that training tonight. I am endlessly proud of Chicago.
A display of copies of Let This Radicalize You on a table in front of a sign that reads: "Let This Radicalize You offers stories, strategy and heart for the kind of collective care and resistance we're building together today. It helps us move from reacting to organizing. Showing how ordinary people protect each other, build power, and keep hope alive. Take a copy. Read it. Stay connected."
Reposted by Talila A. Lewis, Esq.
cwebbonline.com
Sometimes we need a moment, but if you tune out completely, they win. Fascism doesn’t need your support, just your silence.
talilalewis.bsky.social
You always make me laugh. I thank you.
Reposted by Talila A. Lewis, Esq.
marcelias.bsky.social
Washington Post vs Democracy Docket.

If you value independent, pro-democracy media over the false neutrality of legacy outlets, support Democracy Docket by subscribing today. hubs.ly/Q03M8rql0
Reposted by Talila A. Lewis, Esq.
kashana.blacksky.app
The judge: it is hereby ordered that you are in fact, not like us
uebey.bsky.social
NEW: Drake loses his defamation case against Kendrick Lamar over the “Not Like Us” lyrics.

More coming @courthousenews.bsky.social
Reposted by Talila A. Lewis, Esq.
lutzfernandez.bsky.social
I put together a 4-page doc for those wary of the rush to integrate in K-12 schools (though much applies beyond).

Four of the main arguments for teachers using AI tools & introducing kids to AI as early as kindergarten are addressed with rebuttals linked to sources.
Help Sheet: Resisting AI Mania in Schools

K-12 educators are under increasing pressure to use—and have students use—a wide range of AI tools. (The term
“AI” is used loosely here, just as it is by many purveyors and boosters.) Even those who envision benefits to schools
of this fast-evolving category of tech should approach the well-funded AI-in-education campaign with skepticism
and caution. Some of the primary arguments for teachers actively using AI tools and introducing students to AI as
early as kindergarten, however, are questionable or fallacious. What follows are four of the most common
arguments and rebuttals with links to sources. I have not attempted balance, in part because so much pro-AI
messaging is out there and discussion of risks and costs is often minimized in favor of hope or resignation. -ALF

Argument: “Schools need to prepare students for the jobs of the future.”
● The skills employers seek haven’t changed much over the decades—and include a lot of
“soft skills” like initiative, problem-solving, communication, and critical thinking.
● Early research is showing that using generative AI can degrade these key skills:
○ An MIT study showed adults using chatGPT to help write an essay “had the lowest
brain engagement and ‘consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic, and
behavioral levels.’” Critically, “ChatGPT users got lazier with each subsequent essay,
often resorting to copy-and-paste by the end of the study.”
○ A business school found those who used AI tools often had worse critical thinking
skills “mediated by increased cognitive offloading. Younger participants exhibited
higher dependence on AI tools and lower critical thinking scores.”
○ Another study revealed those using “ChatGPT engaged less in metacognitive
activities...For instance, learners in the AI group frequently looped back to ChatGPT for
feedback rather than reflecting independently. This dependency not only undermines
critical thinking but also risks long-term skill stagnati… Argument: “AI is a tool, just like a calculator.”
● Calculators don’t provide factually wrong answers, but AI tools have. Last year, Google’s AI
search returned, among other falsehoods, that cats have gone to the moon, that Barack
Obama is Muslim, and that glue goes on pizza. Even though AI tools have and are expected to
improve, children in schools shouldn’t be used as tech firms’ guinea pigs for undertested,
unregulated products while AI firms engage elected officials in actively resisting regulation.
● Calculators don’t provide dangerous, even deadly feedback. In one study, a ”chatbot
recommended that a user, who said they were recovering from addiction, take a ‘small hit’ of
methamphetamine” because, it said, it’s “‘what makes you able to do your job to the best of
your ability.’" Users have received threatening messages from chatbots.
● Calculators don’t pose mental health risks because they aren’t potentially addictive or
designed to encourage repeated use. They don’t flatter, direct, or manipulate. Chatbots have
been designed this way—and this has led to dreadful mental health outcomes for some,
including users in a New York Times report. Alleging a chatbot encouraged their teen to die
by suicide, parents in Florida filed a lawsuit against its maker.
● Calculators don’t lie. Chatbots, however, have misled users. Writer Amanda Guinzburg
shared screenshots of interactions with one that she asked to describe several of her essays.
It spewed out invented material, showing the chatbot hadn’t actually accessed and processed
the essays. After much prodding, it “admitted” it had only acted as though it had done that
requested work, spit out mea culpas—and went on to invent or “lie” again.
● Calculators can’t be used to spread propaganda. AI tools, though, including those meant for
schools, should worry us. Law professor Eric Muller’s back-and-forth with SchoolAI’s “Anne
Frank” character showed his “helluva time trying to get her to say a bad word about Nazis.” In
thi… Argument: “AI won’t replace teachers, but it will save them time and improve their
effectiveness.”
● Adding edtech does not necessarily save teachers time. A recent study found that learning
management systems sold to schools over the past decade-plus as time-savers aren’t
delivering on making teaching easier. Instead, they found this tech (e.g. Google Classroom,
Canvas) is often burdensome and contributes to burnout. As one teacher put it, it “just adds
layers to tasks.”
● “Extra time” is rarely returned to teachers. AI proponents argue that if teachers use AI tools
to grade, prepare lessons, or differentiate materials, they’ll have more time to work with
students. But there are always new initiatives, duties, or committee assignments—the unpaid
work districts rely on—to suck up that time. In a culture of austerity and with a USDOE that is
cutting spending, teachers are likely to be assigned more students. When class sizes grow,
students get less attention, and positions can be cut.
● AI can’t replace what teachers do, but that doesn’t mean teachers won’t be replaced.
Schools are already doing it: Arizona approved a charter school in which students spend
mornings working with AI and the role of teacher is reduced to “guide.” Ed tech expert Neil
Selwyn argues those in “industry and policy circles...hostile to the idea of expensively trained
expert professional educators who have [tenure], pension rights and union protection...
[welcome] AI replacement as a way of undermining the status of the professional teacher.”
● Tech firms have been selling schools on untested products for years. Technophilia has led
to students being on screens for hours in school each week even when their phones are
banned. Writer Jess Grose explains, “Companies never had to prove that devices or software,
broadly speaking, helped students learn before those devices had wormed their way into
America’s public schools.” AI products appear to be no different.
● Efficiency is not effectiveness. “… Argument: “Students are already using AI, so we have to teach them ethical use.
● If schools want ethical students, teach ethics. More students are using AI tools to cheat, an
age-old problem they make much easier. This won’t be addressed by showing students how
to use this minute’s AI, an argument implying students don’t know what plagiarism is (solved
by teaching about plagiarism) or understand academic integrity (solved by teaching and
enforcing its bounds)—or that teachers create weak assignments or don’t convey purpose.
The latter aren’t solved by attempting to redirect students motivated and able to cheat.
● Students can be educated on the ethics of AI without encouraging use of AI tools. They can
be taught, as part of media literacy and social media safety programs, about AI’s potential
and applications as well as how it can enable predation, perpetuate bias, and spread
disinformation. They should be taught about the risks of AI and its various social, economic,
and environmental costs. Giving a nod to these issues while integrating AI throughout
schools sends a strong message: the schools don’t really care and neither should students.
● Children can’t be expected to use AI responsibly when adults aren’t. Many pushing schools
to embrace AI don’t know much about it. One example: Education Secretary Linda McMahon,
who said kindergartners should be taught A1 (a steak sauce). The LA Times introduced a
biased and likely politically-motivated AI feature. The Chicago Sun-Times published a
summer reading list including nonexistent books—yet teachers are told to use the same tools
to do similar work. Educators using AI to cut corners can strike students as hypocritical.
● The many costs of AI call into question the possibility of ethical AI use. These include:
○ Energy - AI data centers need huge amounts of water as coolant as well as electricity, pulling
these resources from their communities—which tend to be lower-income—straining the grid,
and raising household cos…
Reposted by Talila A. Lewis, Esq.
hiporg.bsky.social
We can't contain the takeaways from this panel that wove together disability & historical/contemporary white supremacist violence because WHEW 🔥 Really, you'll have to watch the video — we'll link it when it's released. And follow @talilalewis & @emkerrison.

#BeyondCoercion
Reposted by Talila A. Lewis, Esq.
karlbode.com
Turning Point is a race-baiting right wing propaganda op aimed at normalizing race violence and misleading young impressionable kids

you can throw the establishment press' failure to explain this on their funeral pyre along with the five-hundred other recent failures to do their job
donmoyn.bsky.social
This pretty much captures the contradictions of the politics of Kirk and Turning Point: Of course we oppose doxxing and violence, but we will absolutely use inflammatory language, false claims, and enemies list that fuels threats and intimidation.
Several days after publishing the petition calling for Dr. Bray’s dismissal from Rutgers, the Turning Point USA chapter added an update saying that it did not support harassment or the doxxing of him or anyone else.

“I think that all death threats and doxxing are unjustified and not how political disputes should be resolved in civilized society,” Ava Kwan, a Turning Point USA chapter member, said in an email on Wednesday.
But she defended the broader point of the petition, saying, “I think Dr. Antifa, who believes in violence as a political tool, should be fired, of course. Taxpayer money should not fund the salaries of terrorists.”

For years, Turning Point USA has maintained a watch-list of hundreds of professors whom the group accuses of advancing leftist propaganda in the classroom. Dr. Bray is on the list.
Reposted by Talila A. Lewis, Esq.
karlbode.com
you'd think a prominent news outlet like the New York Times might mention that "antifa" isn't an actual organization in a long story about antifa, but nope!

and the subhead helps props up a false claim this professor was up to something seedy as something up for debate
NYT headline: "Rutgers Expert on Antifa Tries to Flee to Spain After Death Threats"

subheadline: "Mark Bray was teaching courses on antifascism. Turning Point USA accused him of belonging to antifa, which he denies. His flight to Spain was canceled abruptly on Wednesday night."
Reposted by Talila A. Lewis, Esq.
jbf1755.bsky.social
Correct.

He’s staging “left-wing” attacks—or more accurately, trying to provoke them—to give him an excuse to use violence against his opposition.
beingliberal.bsky.social
“I co-wrote Trump’s first anti-terrorism plan in 2017-18. He’s not trying to stop ‘left-wing’ terrorism. He is staging it,” Taylor wrote. “His troop deployments are a false flag — meant to provoke a response..."

open.substack.com/pub/beinglib...
Reposted by Talila A. Lewis, Esq.
leahlitman.bsky.social
Brett Kavanaugh: “The Govt sometimes makes brief investigative stops …”
Kavanaugh concurrence
Reposted by Talila A. Lewis, Esq.
karlbode.com
Carr has been demolishing media consolidation limits, consumer protections, and corporate oversight and pretending it's improved government efficiency

it's pure regulatory capture and corruption, but outside of places like the Ars and The Verge, most outlets parrot his efficiency framing
Reposted by Talila A. Lewis, Esq.
djno.ca
📣HAPPENING TOMORROW!

We still have limited spots left, so sign up if you haven't already. Link in bio!

Please note that we can't guarantee specific access/dietary requests for last minute/walk-in registrations. Also see our pre-event access guide in our LinkTree.

See you tomorrow!
Over a greyish-blue background, bolded black font at the top of the poster reads: “TOMORROW!.” Underneath, Logos for the Disability Justice Network of Ontario and Policing-Free Schools are displayed side by side, indicating a collaboration. Under this, the main title reads  “POLICING FREE SCHOOLS IS DISABILITY JUSTICE” in tilted black text boxes with large white and yellow font. Below, a blue and yellow gradient banner reads (in black bolded text): “KNOWLEDGE-MOBILIZATION & CALLS-TO-ACTION.” In smaller black font, a point-form list of topics follows in this order: “Disability Justice in Education & Beyond; Bill 33 & the Campaign for Policing-Free-Schools; Carceral Continuum (Pre-K, K–12 & Post-Secondary); Carceral “Care” in Schooling Spaces; “Beyond the “Traditional” Schooling Site”. Event details are included below in black text: “Friday, October 10th [9AM – 6PM], Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE), 1st Floor, Main Library, 252 Bloor St W, Toronto, ON M5S 1V6.” A yellow highlighted bubble says in black text: “Limited spots available: Registration link in bio! @djnontario” At the bottom left are logos for the University of Toronto OISE, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, and the Department of Leadership, Higher & Adult Education (LHAE). A graphic of a chain being broken by a bird flying appears on the right side of the poster.
Reposted by Talila A. Lewis, Esq.
djno.ca
Over the last few months, we have hosted several focus groups to connect with Black & racialized disabled folks across Ontario to better understand what their experiences with the healthcare sector have been like. We are hosting two virtual focus groups in the month of December to further this work!
A graphic promoting a focus group to explore medical racism and ableism in healthcare. 

The large title reads: "EXPLORING MEDICAL RACISM & ABLEISM IN HEALTHCARE". The text emphasizes a call for participation in a focus group to address medical racism and ableism experienced by Black, racialized, and disabled individuals in Ontario healthcare. It states that the focus group will create an informative toolkit to combat these issues. The flyer lists two virtual sessions:

December 3, 6-8 PM
December 12, 6-8 PM
Compensation: All participants will receive $50 for their time and insights.

QR Code: A QR code is provided for easy registration or access to further information on a website. A link to register or learn more is included. http://tinyurl.com/36pyfh2p 

Contact emails (koubra@djno.ca and sabreina@djno.ca) are provided for further inquiries.

The flyer also includes a logo and a name, Disability Justice Network of Ontario, in the footer.
Reposted by Talila A. Lewis, Esq.
chantalalive.blacksky.app
Link was on my team about fighting ableist language & trying to get people to see its direct relationship to eugenics, it's hard for disabled people to try to speak on that without having support because we always get antagonism.
Reposted by Talila A. Lewis, Esq.
equitableforall.com
Every single time Chantal tries to educate folx about how ableism and fascism are interconnected, defensiveness abounds galore so many of you could benefit from this Pay-What-You-Can virtual Disability Justice training, featuring @talilalewis.bsky.social: www.healthjusticecommons.org/fall-politic...
Reposted by Talila A. Lewis, Esq.
blackamazon.bsky.social
This has been an issue for years now and they have more data than a lil bit of who to ask
blackamazon.bsky.social
And this is why I really am starting hate tech reporting

A whole article on the boom of Bluesky

No mention of the Brazil boom, the anti Blackness and NOT A SINGLE interview with a non white user not provided by Blue Sky

www.platformer.news/bluesky-grow...
Inside Bluesky’s big growth surge
After adding millions of new users in weeks, the company tells Platformer that it will quadruple the size of its moderation team
www.platformer.news
Reposted by Talila A. Lewis, Esq.
olufemiotaiwo.bsky.social
eventually politicians need to start advocating for criminal and civil penalties for people involved in fabricating stories to get citizens incarcerated.

or, put another way: a society that would like to keep functioning has to discourage baldfaced lying, especially by authorities
Reposted by Talila A. Lewis, Esq.
rbreich.bsky.social
Everything Trump is doing now is a preamble for his regime's real goal: to invoke the Insurrection Act.

I don’t want to unduly alarm you, but you need to be aware of this imminent danger. It’s unfolding very rapidly. https://robertreich.substack.com/p/trumps-plan
Reposted by Talila A. Lewis, Esq.
hannahgais.bsky.social
Identifying public officials isn't "doxing." People have the right to know who is working for their government. Nor, for that matter, is it "radical left-wing terrorism." So it's frustrating to see platforms caving to these bad faith characterizations. www.technologyreview.com/2025/10/06/1...
Another effort to track ICE raids was just taken offline
People over Papers was removed by Padlet, the platform it was built on, yesterday.
www.technologyreview.com