Author | Lightnews

dev

dev

@shortfatotaku.bsky.social

370 followers 84 following 2.2K posts

Posts Media Videos Starter Packs

Pinned

dev @shortfatotaku.bsky.social · Jun 5

OH NO I SLEPT IN

It's switch 2 unboxing time www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuDS...

Switch 2 Unboxing!!!

YouTube video by The Dev Kit

www.youtube.com

Reposted by dev

cait (and adonis) @cait.bsky.social · Sep 20

we should have never normalized filming strangers in public and posting them as content

erika @yeeeerika.bsky.social · Jan 13

i don't want to hear your most boomer complaint. what's your most millennial complaint?

Reposted by dev

Project Liberal 🗽 @projectliberal.org · Sep 11

The solution to political violence is liberal democracy.

Everything else is just barbarism with extra steps.

Reposted by dev

Mark Chadbourn @chadbourn.bsky.social · Sep 11

TwitterX flooded with Russian bots calling for US Civil War.

Reposted by dev

Kraut @derparrot.bsky.social · Sep 10

Ok. Go ahead. Post your unhinged takes. But don't come crying when you get blasted on Fox News or some other nutjob site.

dev @shortfatotaku.bsky.social · Jul 23

wtf??

dev @shortfatotaku.bsky.social · Jun 24

no, because i have fucked women

dev @shortfatotaku.bsky.social · Jun 20

the difference, "all gays are actually just bi" is a false statement and "trans women are male" is a true one. they have similar forms, but the difference is in that being gay is not the same type of thing as being trans.

Reposted by dev

Kraut @derparrot.bsky.social · Jun 20

dev @shortfatotaku.bsky.social · Jun 20

i agree with all of this entirely - and yet trans women are still male. it feels wrong to them, it may even be disgusting or immoral to them, it's why they transition, to get away from as much of their maleness as they can - but some always remains.

dev @shortfatotaku.bsky.social · Jun 18

>if a guy buys your land
why did you agree to sell it, if it was yours, and you didn't want to sell it?

>you should be allowed to own your labor.
part of owning a thing is being able to sell it.

dev @shortfatotaku.bsky.social · Jun 18

i disagree with both of these definitions fundamentally, but they are both leftist definitions.

dev @shortfatotaku.bsky.social · Jun 18

organization and management isn't doing nothing. even if your job isn't being an on-the-floor labourer at a factory, if you're the guy who makes sure that raw materials are getting to the factory on schedule, and shipping, and dealing with legal stuff, whatever, that's all real work.

dev @shortfatotaku.bsky.social · Jun 18

another of the leftist definitions of personal/private is, property that is productive for sustenance vs for profit. if i farm a plot & grow enough food for my needs, it's personal. but if i grow excess food, even if i am the only one working the farm, it's private if i try to sell the excess.

dev @shortfatotaku.bsky.social · Jun 18

i assume you don't adhere to the liberal definition of personal/private (which means 'movable' and 'immovable' basically)

one of the leftist definitions of personal/private is, property that you work yourself vs property you own and don't work. ex: your tools vs the tools you give to your employee

dev @shortfatotaku.bsky.social · Jun 18

the issue is the "not doing anything" part. organization and management IS labour, even if you're not directly working on a specific product.

dev @shortfatotaku.bsky.social · Jun 18

I do. I know several definitions of the split in fact.

Like I told you - if i owned stuff, you would collectivize it, and you would violate my individual liberties to do so. both socialists and fascists place "the common good" above the rights of the individual.

dev @shortfatotaku.bsky.social · Jun 18

True. Which isn't liberal whatsoever, since liberals are big fans of private property, minimal government intervention, and free trade.

it's almost like boiling everything down to "capitalism (bad evil stinky)" and "socialism (good moral cute) is really fucking dumb.

dev @shortfatotaku.bsky.social · Jun 18

Why

dev @shortfatotaku.bsky.social · Jun 18

i'm describing the fascists and socialists teaming up to lead a revolution against the liberals, and after the liberals were toppled, the fascists backstabbed the socialists because of course they would.

imagine thinking the liberals are the problem in this scenario.

dev @shortfatotaku.bsky.social · Jun 18

No woman, cis or trans, would ever win again lol

dev @shortfatotaku.bsky.social · Jun 18

it turns out it did not take all that much coaxing for you to admit it. So yes, you share suppression of individual rights with the fascists, glad we agree.

dev @shortfatotaku.bsky.social · Jun 18

Lend lease

dev @shortfatotaku.bsky.social · Jun 18

Lol, you're making my points for me. Maybe you'll see where this goes!

dev @shortfatotaku.bsky.social · Jun 18

Not exactly. While it's true that the revolution failed, and that the socialists didn't support them, what's not true is that it would have succeeded had the socialists supported them.

dev @shortfatotaku.bsky.social · Jun 18

>capital made the real alliance with fascism to crush the left.

unfortunately... no. if you think the fascists loved capitalism, you're also wrong about this one too. they saw it as a tool to subvert and exploit, but they were not themselves interested in capitalist principles.