Rori Thornton (xe/xem/xyr)
sbdrag.bsky.social
Rori Thornton (xe/xem/xyr)
@sbdrag.bsky.social
2K followers 970 following 370 posts
Aroace nonbinary author of queer fantasy romcoms. Peer-reviewed autistic. In college for Animation Game Design. Draws sometimes. Minors DNI, I engage with and repost NSFW.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
Realized I never actually made a post for my most recent published story, The Grand Duke's Masseur! 🌈📚

Find it on most retailers: books2read.com/u/b5Pr1A
And Itchio: sbdrag.itch.io/the-grand-du...

#queerromantasy #mmromance #transmc #historicalromantasy #spicyromance #queerromance
Reposted by Rori Thornton (xe/xem/xyr)
I also need to promo the bundles I'm in this week, so hey! For #AceWeek we have bundles over on itch! With several authors! I'm one of them!

Mega Bundle: riyati.ink/acepride2025
Bundle 1: riyati.ink/ace2025-1 (has all the books from the mega bundle not on bundle 2)
Bundle 2: riyati.ink/ace2025-2
Reposted by Rori Thornton (xe/xem/xyr)
Middle of the week, have you checked out the Ace Pride Week itchio bundle yet? 50+ books featuring ace authors and/or ace major characters!! There's so many good books, so you should do yourself a favor and check it out!

(WHEREVER THE STARS CALL & Laurel are included!)

💜 riyati.ink/acepride2025
Reposted by Rori Thornton (xe/xem/xyr)
oh heck! it's #AcePrideWeek and here's a fantastic bundle deal of ace books! 51 books for only $50! 🌈📚
riyati.ink/acepride2025
I've done art of a lot of the plants, too! And these of Petal ha ha - crushferns are based on the Rose of Jericho, but if it was big and deadly and moved like Theo Jansen's beach sculptures lol
Thank you so much! I'm really glad you enjoyed it; Ive had a lot of fun making the Demonae language and thinking up new ways for plants to eat people, ha ha. 💜
Rating: 4.75/5 ☆
Genre: Cozy Fantasy, LGBT, Romance
Pages: 411

Long Form Review and photos in 🧵
Of this lovely edition from @rainbowcrate.bsky.social and @sbdrag.bsky.social of The Demon King's Gardener
#booksky💙📚 #diversebooksky #readersky #queersky #recs #rainbowcrate #review
Well, that's all I have really. Not sure how many other authors have had this experience, but I'm sure there are at least some afraid to write an original story a specific way because of people who will equate it to fanfic. I hope this helps you be weird and write the thing anyway.
If a work you enjoyed reminds you of fanfic, but it doesn't lessen your enjoyment of the work, you have no other issues with the work, and you cannot pin point a specific aspect that makes the work feel low quality other than it reminding you of fanfiction... why is it bad?
Fanfic isn't the only target of this. Plenty of original fiction tropes and conventions are called inherently bad writing - first person POV is one that comes to mind. This isn't new, and it certainly isn't going to die out completely.
And no, this does not include AI. Fuck AI. AI doesn't know how tropes work, or what makes them work. It doesn't know why a convention is a convention or how to make purposeful choices to subvert or fulfill expectations around conventions and tropes. And when you use it, you aren't learning either.
Any writing tool - tropes, conventions, etc - can be used poorly. They often get used poorly in fanfic because, as stated, many writers are young and learning or just having fun and not worried about craft. But using tropes or conventions isn't inherently poor writing - it's about how you use them.
People like my writing and it reminds them of fanfic, and I think that's rad because it's a reflection of the work and process that made me the author I am today.

And I just really want people to stop conflating tools and conventions used in fanfic with poor writing.
But I do appear to be good at writing funny romances with a focus on character studies - which is what I wrote as fanfiction. The stuff I write now would not exist if I didn't write fanfiction because romance writers are devalued as writers and as an ace I find a lot of trad romance unrelatable
But the space where I felt more able to just DO stuff was fanfic. Because I wasn't trying to be good. I was just having fun. My original work then was trying to write a fantasy epic, because I primarily read and enjoyed fantasy epics. Spoilers: I am not very good at writing fantasy epics.
My fanfic from when I was a teenager? Sucks. Cringe. Of course it is - my original fiction from the same time was equally sucky and cringe. I named a character Rooster. Guess what nickname everyone called him? (No, I didn't know then.)
I was lucky that I had supportive writing mentors in real life growing up - but I've heard the horror stories of academic figures and programs that openly mock genre fiction and forbid the slightest hint of a dragon even if it's a complex metaphor wrapped in the purpliest prose imaginable.
The key to growing as an artist of any kind is experimentation and the only community space many writers can find that welcomes rampant experimentation is fanfic. Where you can just be weird and self-indulgent and find people who are like "yeah, you go, little rockstar".
But I am tired of "reminds me of fanfic" being used as a shorthand for "bad".

My writing skills are a direct result of being able to play and experiment with form while writing fanfic. Yes, also from reading books and consuming media, but also from writing in a space with less strict expectations.
Now, I don't think DKG is "high art" or anything. It's a self-indulgent silly queer love story that helps me stay sane by imagining a world where kindness wins more often than not. It doesn't need to be more than that for me. And I'm so amazed by how many other people love my boys as much as I do 💜
It's an extension of so many things. Academic elitism over what qualifies as "artistic merit" in literature (which is better now than it has been, but still often excludes all genre fic). The way commercialization tries to quantify an emotional experience, so ppl feel a need to justify enjoyment.
As an aspiring game dev, this is the same logic as "video games can't be art because they're games", but replace art with literature.

Fanfic is, by design, a space to have fun. As I said before, it's play. Since it's play, it can't be literature. Literature is serious, and takes itself seriously.
Caveat - if you think my writing is poor quality? Just say that. That's fine. Don't use "reads like fanfic" as a shorthand for "I think this is poor quality".

If the only thing you think is "bad" about my writing is that it reminds you of fanfic and nothing else, then it's about how you see fanfic
I get real reviews that are "I really liked this story, but it reminded me of fanfic".

Why is it a but? What part of it reminding you of fanfic lessened your enjoyment? Did it lessen your enjoyment, or do you just exclusively associate fanfiction with bad writing?
Which is probably another thing that makes my writing read as fanfic, but that's not the point I'm trying to make here.

The point I'm trying to make is that I need a lot of people to really look at the way they view fiction as inherently less valuable if it reminds them of fanfic.
The rise of epithets in fanfic is directly from writers getting pushed the advice to not overuse character names, but not being able to use only pronouns because both (or more) characters use the same pronouns, which makes things less clear instead of more. So epithets are used to break up name use.