@qedscience.bsky.social
Reposted
Recently tried it on our published paper (neuroscience, biological psychiatry field, so out of the main @qedscience.bsky.social domain). But still, very impressed with the identified gaps and identified novelty in the field! Can we re-use/paraphrase some of the novelty findings? Highly recommend!
November 25, 2025 at 4:13 PM
Recently tried it on our published paper (neuroscience, biological psychiatry field, so out of the main @qedscience.bsky.social domain). But still, very impressed with the identified gaps and identified novelty in the field! Can we re-use/paraphrase some of the novelty findings? Highly recommend!
Let us know!
Do you do journal clubs in your lab? if you run the paper you're presenting in @qedscience.bsky.social (it's great for finding -problems) please let me know! I'd love to echo the discussion here, and compare your insights about the paper with q.e.d's comments #qedjournalclub
November 25, 2025 at 3:48 PM
Let us know!
Reposted
Why it's encouraged to run your paper in @qedscience.bsky.social as soon as possible
November 25, 2025 at 3:22 PM
Why it's encouraged to run your paper in @qedscience.bsky.social as soon as possible
Check it out!
A really nice article in The Scientist about q.e.d!
@qedscience.bsky.social - If you're not using it yet, now's the time!
www.the-scientist.com/q-e-d-an-ai-...
@qedscience.bsky.social - If you're not using it yet, now's the time!
www.the-scientist.com/q-e-d-an-ai-...
q.e.d: An AI Tool for Smarter Manuscript Review
A team of researchers developed q.e.d, an AI-powered system designed to deliver rigorous and constructive feedback on scientific manuscripts in minutes.
www.the-scientist.com
November 19, 2025 at 3:17 PM
Check it out!
Reposted
ai peer review: "The problem is that the fun ends when you need to publish it and go through the [review] process.”
@OdedRechavi
@qedscience.bsky.social
www.the-scientist.com/q-e-d-an-ai-...
@OdedRechavi
@qedscience.bsky.social
www.the-scientist.com/q-e-d-an-ai-...
q.e.d: An AI Tool for Smarter Manuscript Review
A team of researchers developed q.e.d, an AI-powered system designed to deliver rigorous and constructive feedback on scientific manuscripts in minutes.
www.the-scientist.com
November 19, 2025 at 1:00 PM
ai peer review: "The problem is that the fun ends when you need to publish it and go through the [review] process.”
@OdedRechavi
@qedscience.bsky.social
www.the-scientist.com/q-e-d-an-ai-...
@OdedRechavi
@qedscience.bsky.social
www.the-scientist.com/q-e-d-an-ai-...
Reposted
Most setbacks (logic gaps, novelty confusion, unsupported conclusions) are preventable.
That’s what the @lifescienceeditors.bsky.social x @qedscience.bsky.social pilot is for.
Impact, not (necessarily 😉) impact factor.
Please reach out! We'd love to help!
www.lifescienceeditors.com/qed-pilot/
That’s what the @lifescienceeditors.bsky.social x @qedscience.bsky.social pilot is for.
Impact, not (necessarily 😉) impact factor.
Please reach out! We'd love to help!
www.lifescienceeditors.com/qed-pilot/
Limited Time AI offering! - Scientific editing and writing experts - Life Science Editors
AI that thinks critically. Editors who know what matters.
www.lifescienceeditors.com
November 14, 2025 at 8:27 PM
Most setbacks (logic gaps, novelty confusion, unsupported conclusions) are preventable.
That’s what the @lifescienceeditors.bsky.social x @qedscience.bsky.social pilot is for.
Impact, not (necessarily 😉) impact factor.
Please reach out! We'd love to help!
www.lifescienceeditors.com/qed-pilot/
That’s what the @lifescienceeditors.bsky.social x @qedscience.bsky.social pilot is for.
Impact, not (necessarily 😉) impact factor.
Please reach out! We'd love to help!
www.lifescienceeditors.com/qed-pilot/
Reposted
Tried @qedscience.bsky.social by running our published paper through it. It identified 2 issues unknown to us. Amazing work, Dr. @odedrechavi.bsky.social and team. 👌👌👌
November 9, 2025 at 7:32 AM
Tried @qedscience.bsky.social by running our published paper through it. It identified 2 issues unknown to us. Amazing work, Dr. @odedrechavi.bsky.social and team. 👌👌👌
Reposted
The support from @embopress.org and @reviewcommons.org means a lot! Thank you @tlemberger.bsky.social ! @qedscience.bsky.social
Very cool! I agree AI scientific review can be useful if it is transparent. It is all progressing very fast and will change everything. @qedScience @bioRxiv is a great first step. We are doing some human-based eval, so more soon from @EMBOPress @ReviewCommons with @qedScience. Watch this space ;-)
Excited to launch an openRxiv partnership with the scientist-run AI review service qed (@qedscience.bsky.social), the brainchild of @odedrechavi.bsky.social 1/n
openrxiv.org/enabling-rev...
openrxiv.org/enabling-rev...
November 6, 2025 at 3:47 PM
The support from @embopress.org and @reviewcommons.org means a lot! Thank you @tlemberger.bsky.social ! @qedscience.bsky.social
Reposted
Enabling options for review: bioRxiv authors now have the option to send their preprints directly to @qedscience.bsky.social , an authors-centered AI review platform, for automated feedback on their paper.
openrxiv.org/enabling-rev...
#OpenScience #Preprints #openrxiv #qedscience #biorxiv
openrxiv.org/enabling-rev...
#OpenScience #Preprints #openrxiv #qedscience #biorxiv
November 6, 2025 at 2:42 PM
Enabling options for review: bioRxiv authors now have the option to send their preprints directly to @qedscience.bsky.social , an authors-centered AI review platform, for automated feedback on their paper.
openrxiv.org/enabling-rev...
#OpenScience #Preprints #openrxiv #qedscience #biorxiv
openrxiv.org/enabling-rev...
#OpenScience #Preprints #openrxiv #qedscience #biorxiv
Reposted
Excited to launch an openRxiv partnership with the scientist-run AI review service qed (@qedscience.bsky.social), the brainchild of @odedrechavi.bsky.social 1/n
openrxiv.org/enabling-rev...
openrxiv.org/enabling-rev...
Enabling options for review: from training and transparency to author-centered AI tools - openRxiv
Peer review is widely viewed as a critical aspect of biomedical communication. Ideally, it provides authors with feedback so they can improve manuscripts and gives readers, particularly nonspecialists...
openrxiv.org
November 6, 2025 at 2:32 PM
Excited to launch an openRxiv partnership with the scientist-run AI review service qed (@qedscience.bsky.social), the brainchild of @odedrechavi.bsky.social 1/n
openrxiv.org/enabling-rev...
openrxiv.org/enabling-rev...
Reposted
IT'S HAPPENING! 💥 I'm psyched to launch the collaboration between @qedscience.bsky.social & @openrxiv.bsky.social @biorxivpreprint.bsky.social! Preprint + q.e.d = your science is out there, and anyone can appreciate it. Let's care about making discoveries, and not on “getting published” (1/3) 👇
November 6, 2025 at 2:49 PM
IT'S HAPPENING! 💥 I'm psyched to launch the collaboration between @qedscience.bsky.social & @openrxiv.bsky.social @biorxivpreprint.bsky.social! Preprint + q.e.d = your science is out there, and anyone can appreciate it. Let's care about making discoveries, and not on “getting published” (1/3) 👇
Reposted
Let's go! Super excited to partner with @richardsever.bsky.social and the fantastic @openrxiv.bsky.social team - Preprints have been the best thing that happened to science publishing during my lifetime, and we're happy @qedscience.bsky.social can make preprints do more 👊
November 6, 2025 at 2:52 PM
Let's go! Super excited to partner with @richardsever.bsky.social and the fantastic @openrxiv.bsky.social team - Preprints have been the best thing that happened to science publishing during my lifetime, and we're happy @qedscience.bsky.social can make preprints do more 👊
We’re thrilled to share that @openrxiv.bsky.social and @biorxiv-medrxiv.bsky.social now integrate @qedscience.bsky.social. This collaboration reflects a shared effort to make scientific evaluation more transparent and constructive.
Enabling options for review: bioRxiv authors now have the option to send their preprints directly to @qedscience.bsky.social , an authors-centered AI review platform, for automated feedback on their paper.
openrxiv.org/enabling-rev...
#OpenScience #Preprints #openrxiv #qedscience #biorxiv
openrxiv.org/enabling-rev...
#OpenScience #Preprints #openrxiv #qedscience #biorxiv
November 6, 2025 at 2:51 PM
We’re thrilled to share that @openrxiv.bsky.social and @biorxiv-medrxiv.bsky.social now integrate @qedscience.bsky.social. This collaboration reflects a shared effort to make scientific evaluation more transparent and constructive.
Reposted
Stay tuned for an important update later today! @qedscience.bsky.social
a man standing in front of a sign that says believe i believe in you
ALT: a man standing in front of a sign that says believe i believe in you
media.tenor.com
November 6, 2025 at 8:28 AM
Stay tuned for an important update later today! @qedscience.bsky.social
Reposted
More exciting news from qed next week!
BIG ANNOUNCEMENT📣: I haven’t been this excited to be part of something new in 15 years… Thrilled to reveal the passion project I’ve been working on for the past year and a half!🙀🥳 (thread 👇)
October 30, 2025 at 7:23 AM
More exciting news from qed next week!
Thank you @richardsever.bsky.social
When I was in high school, my math teacher said ”w^5” [which was what we wanted] instead of “qed”. Feels appropriate here given the thoughtful framing of the project by @odedrechavi.bsky.social and his colleagues
Here’s how: qedscience.com
October 26, 2025 at 2:25 PM
Thank you @richardsever.bsky.social
@odedrechavi.bsky.social’s @qedscience.bsky.social rocks. Tried it on - not even fully topically supported - draft MS and it is bang on with flagging the gaps and suggesting solutions. #QED #qedrocks
October 23, 2025 at 8:17 AM
Reposted
The Manuscript Adviser is more specific and currently provides feedback on tittle, abstract, missing references and overstated claims. The latter being the most interesting aspect so far. Similar to the gaps idea in www.qedscience.com but qed was much stronger on the one example I tested both on
October 22, 2025 at 8:50 AM
The Manuscript Adviser is more specific and currently provides feedback on tittle, abstract, missing references and overstated claims. The latter being the most interesting aspect so far. Similar to the gaps idea in www.qedscience.com but qed was much stronger on the one example I tested both on
Reposted
With the Reading Assistant I tried to get it to act as reviewer and got a response that makes it look like they are trying their best to avoid this use case.
October 22, 2025 at 8:50 AM
With the Reading Assistant I tried to get it to act as reviewer and got a response that makes it look like they are trying their best to avoid this use case.
Reposted
🧪🧠 Experimental results 🥁🥁: we submitted the same #neuroscience paper twice to @qedscience.bsky.social loved the concept, organization and text & experiment suggestions. Both reviews incisive, not identical (what does this teach us about LLMs?). Strong A+ @natureportfolio.nature.com @science.org
October 22, 2025 at 2:01 AM
🧪🧠 Experimental results 🥁🥁: we submitted the same #neuroscience paper twice to @qedscience.bsky.social loved the concept, organization and text & experiment suggestions. Both reviews incisive, not identical (what does this teach us about LLMs?). Strong A+ @natureportfolio.nature.com @science.org
Reposted
Have to try this @qedscience.bsky.social AI 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Unlike the heart attack of getting a “Decision” email, it’s such a good feeling to get a “Your review is ready” email from qed :)
October 21, 2025 at 8:07 PM
Have to try this @qedscience.bsky.social AI 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
Reposted
Unlike the heart attack of getting a “Decision” email, it’s such a good feeling to get a “Your review is ready” email from qed :)
October 21, 2025 at 4:40 PM
Unlike the heart attack of getting a “Decision” email, it’s such a good feeling to get a “Your review is ready” email from qed :)
An outage affecting several services on the internet is also impacting qed's platform. We're investigating this now, and will update you when we have more details.
October 20, 2025 at 8:20 AM
An outage affecting several services on the internet is also impacting qed's platform. We're investigating this now, and will update you when we have more details.
Reposted
Really amazing initiative from @odedrechavi.bsky.social & Co at @qedscience.bsky.social: an AI tool to critically evaluate your work & get constructive feedback to help you assess/improve it. Read the whole 🧵fo details & website link 👏👍👇
BIG ANNOUNCEMENT📣: I haven’t been this excited to be part of something new in 15 years… Thrilled to reveal the passion project I’ve been working on for the past year and a half!🙀🥳 (thread 👇)
October 15, 2025 at 7:35 PM
Really amazing initiative from @odedrechavi.bsky.social & Co at @qedscience.bsky.social: an AI tool to critically evaluate your work & get constructive feedback to help you assess/improve it. Read the whole 🧵fo details & website link 👏👍👇
Reposted
This is amazing and moves scientific publishing into the modern age in a MAJOR way. @qedscience.bsky.social by @odedrechavi.bsky.social and team, and planyourscience.com by @kordinglab.bsky.social, are my gamechanging life-hack recommendations for all scientists!
BIG ANNOUNCEMENT📣: I haven’t been this excited to be part of something new in 15 years… Thrilled to reveal the passion project I’ve been working on for the past year and a half!🙀🥳 (thread 👇)
October 15, 2025 at 8:45 PM
This is amazing and moves scientific publishing into the modern age in a MAJOR way. @qedscience.bsky.social by @odedrechavi.bsky.social and team, and planyourscience.com by @kordinglab.bsky.social, are my gamechanging life-hack recommendations for all scientists!