Philip N Cohen
banner
philipncohen.com
Philip N Cohen
@philipncohen.com

Sociologist and demographer, University of Maryland; SocArXiv director.

New book: Citizen Scholar: Public Engagement for Social Scientists https://cup.columbia.edu/book/citizen-scholar/9780231555418

Website: philipncohen.com
Blog: familyinequality.com .. more

Philip N. Cohen is an American sociologist. He is a professor of sociology at the University of Maryland, College Park, and director of SocArXiv, an open archive of the social sciences. .. more

Political science 34%
Sociology 29%
Pinned
I'm about 18 months and 20,000 words into the "pronatalism" tag on Family Inequality. Surely this means my book is almost done.
familyinequality.wordpress.com/tag/pronatal...

Got a little lost there for a bit, but they have a reassuring tendency in that magazine, however much they circle around a point, to end up at the conclusion that what we really need is "a just society." Can't argue against it.

wow, I think "birth are become more political polarized" is the most errors I ever published in a six-word sequence.
"Factcheck [of Lyman Stone]: Conservatives want children, Democrats want sexual deviance."

It is true that birth are become more political polarized.

familyinequality.wordpress.com/2026/02/06/f...

/1

Yikes, it was 6 years ago Lyman invited me to be on a panel he organized at AEI about falling birth rates. Forgot about that.

Did they not offer "increasing immigration" as an option?
A majority of Americans say lowering prices should be a higher priority than controlling immigration — NPR/PBS News/Marist poll.
More, via Opinion Today:
opiniontoday.substack.com/p/260205-top...

It’s not perfect, but it’s better than low labor force participation, high birth rates, low education, and a stagnant economy — run by a patriarchal hierarchy that rams “traditionalism” down the throats of its disempowered subjects, partly by scaring them about sexual deviance and low birth rates
/7

But the real point is that, just as these various outcomes are co-determined across the lives of individuals, they also unfold together within societies. Women enter the labor force, they have fewer children, those children get more education, and the economy benefits...
/6

For what it's worth, here's a regression using GSS data to show that education has a bigger effect on births for women than political views:
/5

You shouldn't treat political views as a fixed cause of births, which he knows. So he comes up with stuff like this to assert this imagined process of alignment, "you can find tons of Obama-Trump voters: and they tend to be Obama voters with kids"
/4

You can just as well argue that the parties are aligning by education as by birth rates. Note how much this looks like the first figure. Education is also become polarized.
/3

But not that: “It is now widely understood that having babies is essentially a right-wing activity ... Dems are increasingly *definitionally* the party of sexual nontraditionalism ... [people] fundamentally become Dems because the Dem party is friendly and welcoming to their sexual behaviors.”
/2

"Factcheck [of Lyman Stone]: Conservatives want children, Democrats want sexual deviance."

It is true that birth are become more political polarized.

familyinequality.wordpress.com/2026/02/06/f...

/1

The legal status matters, so I use the term for that. But people should say what they want, and let the bureaucracy catch up. (Funny, in testing on the term "unmarried partner," the Census Bureau found some non-native English speakers thought it meant business partners.)

Ya except I think we can model it pretty easily with economic, health, and social class variables. I'm not good at that kind of thing, but
Partner prospects and the marriage promotion fallacy
The mind-boggling suggestion that people who aren’t married might be at least partly aware of the costs and benefits of marriage given their actually-existing options, and are already acting …
familyinequality.wordpress.com

I agree. His original ideas were in linguistics. In politics he did the work of explaining things.

Reposted by Philip N. Cohen

“Maybe she’s born with it…maybe it’s marriage”

People have different views. I wouldn't throw out a chapter based on this - even if he is a bad person - unless the reason you had it was because you thought he was a good person (rather than because the ideas were good). Good luck!

Thank you!

To put it in terms they would easily understand if the subjects was anything else: The next marriage started will not be as beneficial as the average existing marriage

Some economists love to imagine people are rational - except poor women and Black women, about whom whole books are written trying to explain why they don't make rational choices about marriage. ->

But I did *not* mean there is something intangible about marriage that benefits people. I meant what I said: people are "incredibly good at figuring out *which* marriages are beneficial.” So the beneficial marriages are taken, and the people who aren’t marrying have a good reason for that. ->

She responded: "Philip might be onto something. Perhaps there is an intangible quality in marriage that gives those couples, and their kids, an edge." ->

Oster's error. I said: "maybe the secret trick that the public has is that they’re actually incredibly good at figuring out which marriages are beneficial ... we see that married people are doing better, and it might just be that those are the people who have it figured out" ->

Emily Oster interviewed me for her podcast in 2024 - about Melissa Kearney's book, The Two-Parent Privilege - and then they never told me the episode was posted six months later. I guess no one I know listens to it...? Anyway, some belated notes and excerpts:
I was on Emily Oster’s podcast about marriage and didn’t even know it
Well, I knew I did the interview, on March 7, 2024. I just didn’t know that they posted the episode six months later, in October 2024.
familyinequality.wordpress.com

Reposted by Philip N. Cohen

I'm sorry to report that Chip Berlet, longtime investigative reporter, activist, and author, died January 30th. Chip was an important figure in the struggle against both far right political movements and state repression, and he had a big effect on my own life and work.
Chip Berlet (1949-2026)
When neo-fascists began to be followed and recorded, it was Chip that was the one who made the first moves. He gave us the blueprint that antifascist researchers go by today. Thank you, Chip, we will ...
idavox.com
New, from me: Trump finalized his Schedule F policy, allowing him to remove job protections from career civil servants.

The new rule is dishonest and unmoored from reality in its effort to formalize the politicization of the federal government 🧵
donmoynihan.substack.com/p/trumps-sch...
Trump's Schedule F Rule Finalized
A bizarro rule formally justifies politicizing public services
donmoynihan.substack.com

Reposted by Philip N. Cohen

A majority of Americans say lowering prices should be a higher priority than controlling immigration — NPR/PBS News/Marist poll.
More, via Opinion Today:
opiniontoday.substack.com/p/260205-top...