www.usatoday.com/story/opinio...
www.usatoday.com/story/opinio...
"[T]his Court reverses that judgment based on its perusal, over a holiday weekend, of a cold paper record. We are a higher court than the District Court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision."
"[T]his Court reverses that judgment based on its perusal, over a holiday weekend, of a cold paper record. We are a higher court than the District Court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision."
MAGA RESPONDENT: "I don't need to hear them, they're all true."
MAGA RESPONDENT: "I don't need to hear them, they're all true."
"It's bad," Smith says.
Read here:
newrepublic.com/article/2039...
"It's bad," Smith says.
Read here:
newrepublic.com/article/2039...
Why? Because the top 1% ate up an increasingly larger share of the national income — so that $79 trillion flowed to them instead of the working class.
The greatest trick of all is trickle-down economics.
Red herring. Everyone concedes this.
Kagan with the actual dispositive question: “did TX accomplish its partisan objectives by means of a racial gerrymander?”
Red herring. Everyone concedes this.
Kagan with the actual dispositive question: “did TX accomplish its partisan objectives by means of a racial gerrymander?”
A district court found that Texas did a racial gerrymander, rejecting the new map because it is illegal.
But the Supreme Court reversed it.
Because? Must assume the gerrymanderers were acting in good faith (despite the evidence otherwise).
archive.is/BcqrH
archive.is/BcqrH
www.washingtonpost.com/health/2025/...
www.washingtonpost.com/health/2025/...