Nathaniel C. Green
@nathanielcgreen.bsky.social
1.1K followers 320 following 2.5K posts
History professor at Northern Virginia Community College. Author, THE MAN OF THE PEOPLE, by Kansas Press. https://kansaspress.ku.edu/9780700629961/ Currently writing a book on the history of the three-fifths clause. Opinions solely my own.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
nathanielcgreen.bsky.social
Nothing says "manly warfighter super Alpha dude" like "can't stand it if you make fun of his speech."
donmoyn.bsky.social
Thanks goodness Pete Hegseth is eliminating political correctness and letting warriors be warriors*

*if you guys did not watch the mandatory video, or mocked it, expect to be punished
premthakker.bsky.social
NEW: Pentagon officials are forcing staff to watch Pete Hegseth's "Warrior" speech he forced generals to listen to.

Officials are even "testing" staff to see if they watched — and are threatening consequences if they lie about watching it or if they mock it, sources tell @swin24.bsky.social and I.
nathanielcgreen.bsky.social
This administration actively wants you to die
nathanielcgreen.bsky.social
The basic myth that a movement for rights or political equality by a marginalized group that resulted in substantial gains effectively completely and permanently eradicated the oppression the group was fighting. It's astoundingly common in the way students write, and the way many people think.
nathanielcgreen.bsky.social
Someone probably already wrote this, but the one that I see a lot in student writing is that the Civil Rights Era essentially "solved" racism, or that second-wave feminism pushed for an end to sexism, leading to "the equality that persists to this day."
nathanielcgreen.bsky.social
When I read something like this, I think: make sure you consider every angle when you write. Don't reject evidence if it doesn't fit your neat and tidy narrative. Because if you do, someone will write a review like this of your book!
nathanielcgreen.bsky.social
Reviews like this tend to focus on something pretty large that the author simply ignored: some approach or claim or evidence that fundamentally challenges the author's point. Often, it seems clear that the author has gone out of their way not to consider that evidence. They didn't just miss it.
nathanielcgreen.bsky.social
Often I find those reviews are far more incisive. They point out genuine foundational problems with an argument or its evidence. But they're the kind of review I dread someone writing about my own work, because I want readers to like what I write, and because I don't want to miss anything.
nathanielcgreen.bsky.social
There's this trope of the cheap review, written by someone waiting in the tall grass, sniping petty grievances at an author to score cheap points. Those exist. But far more often, I've found devastating reviews are more like this one: written by someone disappointed by a book they wanted to like.
nathanielcgreen.bsky.social
Good thread that describes what I consider the most devastating type of review: one written by someone who was genuinely rooting for the book.
evanbernick.bsky.social
Now on @ssrn.bsky.social, forthcoming in the Harvard Law Review. “Alas,” I think Akhil Amar’s new book, “Born Equal,” is not a success and I explain why at great length. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
Amar is an engaging writer and a splendid storyteller. Alas—to borrow one of Amar's favorite interjections— even at 736 pages, Born Equal omits too much of importance, even as it advertises itself as the definitive account of its subject matter. The result of Amar's attempt to fit an entire century's worth of American constitutionalism into a coherent narrative is never boring. But ultimately, it reveals more about the mapmaker than the territory. Despite Amar's professed commitments to democracy and equality, Born Equal slights the democratic work of multitudes of people who have transformed our constitutional order without sharing Amar's constitutional faith. And it obscures inequalities that will persist as long as the cult to which
Amar demands fealty.
Reposted by Nathaniel C. Green
jamellebouie.net
the broad public does not like chaos and disorder and everything you can do to emphasize that it is the federal government that is responsible for chaos and disorder is a point in your favor. it’s classic nonviolent confrontation!
nathanielcgreen.bsky.social
Every Thanksgiving, I make a double-decker cast-iron skillet apple pie. Crust, filling, more crust, more filling, then top crust. Happy to share the recipe.
nathanielcgreen.bsky.social
But wait, I was told the government was working more efficiently now. There's a whole department and everything.
Reposted by Nathaniel C. Green
cingraham.bsky.social
"Depends on who you ask" framing is one of the most grating tics in modern political journalism. Objective reality exists and your job is to describe it.
davidcorn.bsky.social
A classic case of irresponsible both-sidesism from the NYT. The story is that Trump and MAGA propagandists are lying about Portland to incite a conflict, not that there are different views of the matter.
nathanielcgreen.bsky.social
What would 25 year old Kid Rock think of this crusty curmudgeon?
acyn.bsky.social
Kid Rock: Do you know what is stupid… these chicks running around on campuses with blue hair, five nose rings.
nathanielcgreen.bsky.social
"Whenever [I] hear any one arguing for slavery I feel a strong impulse to see it tried on him personally."
-Abraham Lincoln, March 17, 1865
quod.lib.umich.edu/l/lincoln/li...
Reposted by Nathaniel C. Green
nathanielcgreen.bsky.social
No, the media will say that "experts say" it's "more complicated." On the media complicity Bingo card, "experts say" is the new FREE SPACE.
nathanielcgreen.bsky.social
In a month and a half, it'll be Mister Winter Man, trudging across college campuses in the snow wearing shorts and flip-flops.
Reposted by Nathaniel C. Green
beijingpalmer.bsky.social
after careful study, I believe only people born between 1975 and 1995 should be allowed to use the internet
Reposted by Nathaniel C. Green
jonathanbernstein.bsky.social
Editors are great. Editors are terrific. Even the ones who drove me nuts.
olufemiotaiwo.bsky.social
repost this if an editor has ever saved you from yourself
blipstress.bsky.social
An actual hot take: Too many authors are afraid of editors watering down their voice or whatever and not afraid enough of editors letting you put any old slop on the page.
nathanielcgreen.bsky.social
Great thread about why immigration is awesome and cities rule because they're diverse.
kathbarbadoro.bsky.social
I love living in a city full of immigrants and tons and tons of people who are not at all like me and not like each other. It makes us all better and it makes our city better. I know I’m preaching to the choir by saying this on the lib app but I sometimes just get so overwhelmed by how special it is
Reposted by Nathaniel C. Green
kathbarbadoro.bsky.social
I really think this is why the subway looms so large in the conservative American mind. Because 99% of the time it is proof that the American experiment in diversity triumphs, as long as paranoid white people aren’t there
nathanielcgreen.bsky.social
The type of people for whom hell was built.