Michèle Champagne
@michhham.bsky.social
420 followers 320 following 1.3K posts
Graphic artist in Montreal. Studies mandatory positivity and its effects on freedom of expression, architecture media, and “smart” cities. Invited to McGill, UQAM, and Harvard. — michelechampagne.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Michèle Champagne
oddletters.bsky.social
i published this in the post-sidewalk period that might be relevant as well reallifemag.com/seeing-witho...
michhham.bsky.social
I’m working to fix this with @sarahkmoser.bsky.social at @mcgill.ca. An academic paper is in the works.

If you’ve written an essay, paper, or spoken publicly about the coalition, write to: [email protected]. You may already be on our reading list, but you never know.
michhham.bsky.social
The Block Sidewalk coalition played a key part the cancellation of Sidewalk’s “smart” city in Toronto, along with other vectors like bad public procurement, whack policy, wild PR, and the pandemic.

Since then, the coalition has received minor mention in academic journals, books, and theatre plays.
michhham.bsky.social
Something to remember in the framing of “urban innovation” tales. Political choices matter:
stateofthecity.bsky.social
24/ And stop pretending tech is a magic wand. Bixi had good bikes & tech, but they only became great with the right service model. Given relative risks v benefits, the City decided it was its job to *spawn* a bikeshare rather than to 'own' it. Given the limits of local govt, this choice mattered.
michhham.bsky.social
I’m thankful for Bixi in @villedemontreal.montreal.ca and for rapid backgrounds like these:
stateofthecity.bsky.social
Praise for Montreal's bike-share system, from TIME. Worth a holiday thread on a couple of operational + political aspects of Bixi's history that are intriguingly left unsaid.
cultmtl.com
“Montreal revolutionized the bicycle-sharing trend. The tech behind BIXI became the backbone for bike-sharing programs in London, New York, Chicago and dozens of other places, turning two wheels into a genuine option for navigating cities.”
Reposted by Michèle Champagne
soumayakeynes.ft.com
"Dutch government takes control of Chinese-owned chipmaker Nexperia"

by @andybounds.bsky.social, Ryan McMorrow and Demetri Sevastopulo

www.ft.com/content/605e...
michhham.bsky.social
This news experience and chip story are a reminder that: Digital sovereignty is a choice.
michhham.bsky.social
I’m rather more enjoying the @nrc.nl news experience: it’s timely, and the typesetting and photography are fantastic.

“The Netherlands takes tough action against chip manufacturer Nexperia due to fears of chip knowledge leaks to China.”
Nederland grijpt hard in bij chipfabrikant Nexperia uit angst voor lekken chipkennis naar China
Intellectueel eigendom: Het ministerie van Economische Zaken legt de bedrijfsvoering van chipfabrikant Nexperia grotendeels stil, om te voorkomen dat chipkennis naar China weglekt.
www.nrc.nl
michhham.bsky.social
Recently, @ledevoir.com newspaper—Montreal’s leading title—redesigned its website by abandoning its award-winning graphic design and typesetting in Lyon.

It has “0” results in a search for stories on the bold Dutch takeover of “Nexperia”. And its updated app has no search function.
michhham.bsky.social
I saw a government eager to transform research into innovation without protecting art, design culture, or IP legal aid. I saw a promise to transform defense spending into industrial spending but without Canadian suppliers.

In short, in the survey, I didn't see the seeds of a Canadian model
michhham.bsky.social
There is a narrow window to reclaim Canada’s sovereignty, democracy, and culture. This is about regulation but more about leading the creation of digital infrastructure that is democratically governed—with or without pushing “AI”—and an alternative to American Big Tech and Chinese Big State models.
michhham.bsky.social
– Innovation benefits from design culture, design builds IP, but AI-gen material has an IP problem.

– Health data are “sensitive”. Face “recognition” should be banned. Emotion “recognition” is a pseudoscience.

– Harms are not emerging. False arrests, deepfakes, and workslop are here.

– And more.
michhham.bsky.social
I didn’t fill it out but instead wrote to [email protected], which you can do too. I noted:

– Democracy didn’t figure much in the survey. Democratic governance requires digital regulation and enforcement.

– “AI” is a marketing term.

– “Creators is Silicon Valley’s preferred term ...
michhham.bsky.social
Canadians, fill out this survey on the federal government’s push to accelerate “AI”.

Its technological solutionism reminds me less of DOGE and more of Sidewalk Toronto’s pitch for a “smart city” where power faded into the background while trumpets promised wealth, ethics, and inclusivity.
Help define the next chapter of Canada's AI leadership
Current status: Open from October 1 to October 31, 2025 Canada helped invent modern AI. To stay a leader—and protect our digital sovereignty—we're running a 30-day national sprint to shape a renew...
ised-isde.canada.ca
michhham.bsky.social
I started perusing Bain’s Technology Report 2025, then stopped after diving into a few sub-sections. Despite the article in Futurism.com which reference The Register which references the “From Pilots to Payoff” section, the report overall itself is ... very different:
Technology Report 2025
AI leaders are extending their edge.
www.bain.com
michhham.bsky.social
Ottawa rocks old libraries.
alexbozikovic.bsky.social
Today in Ottawa: Library Archives Canada, Mathers Haldenby, 1967.

This is just the lobby. What a feast of details.
Reposted by Michèle Champagne
simonlewsen.bsky.social
This piece is still the one I'm most proud of in my career. (And @chloeellingson.bsky.social's photos are gorgeous.)