Jörg Broschek 🇨🇦
@jbroschek.bsky.social
2.2K followers 890 following 660 posts
Political Science Prof and Laurier Research Chair | Federalism/Multilevel Governance | Political Economy | (Active) Transportation and Infrastructure Policy | Kitchener/Waterloo Region More at https://tinyurl.com/4pzjpykm
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
jbroschek.bsky.social
Hello!
My research compares how governments address major policy challenges that cut across jurisdictions - from the local to the supranational level.

I currently work on
• trade + industrial policy
• transportation infrastructure policy
• local democratic governance

Recent op-ed contributions ⬇️
jbroschek.bsky.social
... We would recognize the need for a countrywide dialogue about the generational challenges facing Canada. We would provide Canadians with the information they need to make thoughtful choices... And we would recognize that serious conversation takes time."

www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/arti...
Opinion: We’re missing a vision for Canada
We are living in a different world, and we need to talk about what that means for all of us
www.theglobeandmail.com
jbroschek.bsky.social
"And even if the Carney government has a plan, when did the rest of us agree to it? If Canada is really at a crossroads, you would expect a serious national conversation about which road we should follow. (...)"

And:

"Here’s what a better response to a “hinge moment” would look like....
jbroschek.bsky.social
In the EU, all of this has been, and is, unfolding within a multilayered public discourse - at the member state and the European level. Political elites, parliaments, the media...

Whereas in Canada, to quote @alasdairroberts.bsky.social excellent op-ed from September in the Globe and Mail...
jbroschek.bsky.social
EU member states may also be willing to give up more sovereignty in defence (and otherwise) in light of a dramatically changing geopolitical context. But this happens - huge difference to the US - within a democratic multi-level system where the rule of law, ROE etc. are still upheld + valued. And:
jbroschek.bsky.social
If there is really no alternative to closer defence integration - no capacity for choice, in other words - as all quoted experts seem to suggest, then this begs a more fundamental question that calls for an honest, broad public discourse:

To what extent is Canada still a "sovereign" state?
bhaggart.bsky.social
My naive wish is that even one Canadian journalist, one politician, one security analyst, would address the implications of Canada choosing military integration with an authoritarian power that no longer respects the rule of law or international law.
Looks like that’s not going to happen today.
Golden Dome signals change to Canada’s long-time opposition to joining U.S. missile defence
Canada opted to stay on the sidelines in 2005 as the U.S. developed defences against ballistic missiles
www.theglobeandmail.com
jbroschek.bsky.social
It will “never happen again”:

From the broken Greenbelt promise over multiple leadership failures in handling Covid (Rod Phillips, LTC homes, playground closures) to the “hat in hand” comment.

I can't recall a government apologizing so many times.

globalnews.ca/news/1146863...
Ontario government won’t say which cabinet minister vehicles were speeding, citing safety | Globalnews.ca
Documents show vehicles assigned to Premier Doug Ford's cabinet ministers were caught by automated speed cameras 23 times, including one driving at 70 km/h in a 40 zone.
globalnews.ca
Reposted by Jörg Broschek 🇨🇦
dbcurren.bsky.social
This is quite a good briefing note on Canada’s #productivity problems and its dependence on the #US and #resource #exports. One data point: #Canada ranks 48th in #economic #complexity.
www.policyschool.ca/wp-content/u...
www.policyschool.ca
Reposted by Jörg Broschek 🇨🇦
davidheniguk.bsky.social
On tariffs, there wasn't a lot the EU (or anyone else) could do to push back on the US damaging itself. On regulation, a lot more important to draw the line as is happening
jbroschek.bsky.social
The EU is confronted with similar challenges like Canada, and it has an industrial strategy (of course far from perfect).

If this is the “Canadian moment we need to seize”, then I would expect more depth, breadth and systematic thinking than what we see here based on what has transpired so far.
jbroschek.bsky.social
The Draghi Report, for example:

➡️ Identifies 3 transformations the EU is facing
➡️ Defines corresponding key policy goals
➡️ Proposes horizontal (policy) and vertical (sectors) measures to achieve these goals
➡️ Outlines institutional governance reforms required to implement this industrial strategy
Screenshot from the Draghi Report Content Page
jbroschek.bsky.social
An industrial "strategy" without at least mentioning the net-zero economy should be a first red flag.

There is no indication that this “three-point plan” is at least trying to emulate what the EU has developed under the VDL Commission + the Draghi Report.

www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/art...
Joly unveils three-point industrial strategy to counter Trump’s tariffs
Innovation Minister points to targeted investments, fast approvals for projects and Buy Canadian policy
www.theglobeandmail.com
jbroschek.bsky.social
What buying access to the American market means in practice:

"The legislation has come under attack from US oil and gas companies, with ExxonMobil’s chief executive Darren Woods describing the rules as threatening."
jennifer-clapp.bsky.social
Bowing to bullies would only make a bad situation worse
"A panoply of laws forcing companies to fight deforestation, labour abuses and reduce their impact on the environment are being weakened or delayed, and the US is pushing Brussels to go further."

www.ft.com/content/678f...
US demands EU dismantle green regulations in threat to trade deal
Washington wants American companies to be exempted from rules such as having to draw up climate transition plans
www.ft.com
jbroschek.bsky.social
I honestly hope you are right. I also understand the difficult position the federal government is in. But - and being aware of the limited information we have, as I am reading the tea leaves here - I am even more concerned now than I was this morning (unlike Minister LeBlanc).
jbroschek.bsky.social
“But there are more areas where we are stronger together, and that’s what we’re focused on.”

The problem: "Stronger together" rests on the premise Trump views Canada as a partner, and not as a vulnerable, dependent + resource-rich neighbor it can dominate.

www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/art...
Four key moments from Carney’s meeting with Trump in Washington
Mutual love, natural conflict and 51st state jokes as leaders meet in Oval Office
www.theglobeandmail.com
jbroschek.bsky.social
Thank you @stevenchase.bsky.social for asking the Golden Dome question. But still 🤷‍♂️

Also, would be interesting to know more about what "joint ventures" and "developing certain industries together" exactly means when they talk about "formulas".
jbroschek.bsky.social
This "manufacturing" of a conflict around ASE represents a more general phenomenon. We've seen it here now with bike lanes and ASE. Other countries experience it in different areas, too. Either way, it prevents better policy outcomes and - indeed - contributes to erode public trust in institutions.
jbroschek.bsky.social
The premier, councillors and mayors, amplified by media commentary, have been:

➡️evoking emotions by suggesting non-law complying drivers are victims (it's "punitive")
➡️reframing cause and effect: bureaucrats, not drivers are the problem (cash grab)
➡️ pretending all of this is "common sense"
jbroschek.bsky.social
One has to put this puzzle into perspective. The ASE program is a general interest reform that:

➡️is effective in improving road safety
➡️only requires drivers to comply with an existing law
➡️at the expense of a few minutes added travel time.

That's it. Not a huge sacrifice. So what happened?
jbroschek.bsky.social
A comparative angle leads to a different conclusion: manufactured conflict rather than poor execution.

The question to begin with is:

Why do other countries use ASE much more broadly, e.g. hidden mobile cameras, 24/7, to enforce 30km/h speed limits in residential areas - without so much backlash?
jbroschek.bsky.social
I suspect it varies from province to province. As for Ontario, as far as I know the only potential concern would be whether or not this would pose a problem for emergency vehicles. Otherwise I believe munis have leeway.
jbroschek.bsky.social
Eine traurige Nachricht. Wenige Autoren haben mich so in den ersten Jahren meines Studiums geprägt wie Claus Offe. Nicht nur "Politische Herrschaft und Klassenstrukturen" oder die "Strukturprobleme", sondern auch Aufsätze wie "Die Utopie der Null-Option". Ich habe noch alle Kopien von damals (viele)
steffenmau.bsky.social
Herausragender Wissenschaftler, bewunderter Autor, befreundeter Kollege, kluger Ratgeber: Claus Offe ist gestorben!
jbroschek.bsky.social
And this spin is becoming a thing now, first Ottawa, now - shocker - Queen's Park:

"But targets are not outcomes. We believe in achievable outcomes, not unrealistic objectives."

Serious climate policy-making going on here.