And then someone asked Kevin O’Neil to do a wraparound cover for the #2000AD Christmas issue!
Pure nightmare fuel!
I can only think it’s either a) to
jump the queue or b) maybe don’t vet me TOO hard.
I can only think it’s either a) to
jump the queue or b) maybe don’t vet me TOO hard.
But of course most of my books and stuff are still boxed up, so yet again I have no idea where it is.
An original 1866 Xmas issue of All The Year Round, with end papers (not from a bound volume), feat. the 1st printing of the best ghost story ever – Charles Dickens's The Signal-man!
But of course most of my books and stuff are still boxed up, so yet again I have no idea where it is.
Are we talking Torchwood level sex and violence here or just grim #DoctorWho ala Satan Pit or Dark Water?
Ms 11 wants to watch but I’ve not seen an official rating.
Are we talking Torchwood level sex and violence here or just grim #DoctorWho ala Satan Pit or Dark Water?
Ms 11 wants to watch but I’ve not seen an official rating.
Bill Shorten still gets what the ALP should be about. He’s a serious contender for the best PM we never had.
Albanese is worse. Much worse.
He’s not as idiotic or vile as Morrison but his fascist tendencies are more honed
Bill Shorten still gets what the ALP should be about. He’s a serious contender for the best PM we never had.
(The Others is still very good though.)
(The Others is still very good though.)
And when the key word in AI is “Artificial”, then …
Wait … who am I kidding? MAGAs already treat the 10 Commandments as a to-do list!
And when the key word in AI is “Artificial”, then …
Wait … who am I kidding? MAGAs already treat the 10 Commandments as a to-do list!
Triple M really is a time warp for Aussie blokes desperate to hang onto their flannel-wearing teenage days drinking a couple of Dad’s tinnies down in the garage.
If I must have builders working next door, just once can it be one who prefers ABC Classic FM?
Triple M really is a time warp for Aussie blokes desperate to hang onto their flannel-wearing teenage days drinking a couple of Dad’s tinnies down in the garage.
TFW the choice of hypothetical example in the law manual to illustrate the definition of a clearly illegal order is exactly the same as the actual scenario being “debated”, it’s time to give up hoping this is about legal interpretation or semantics.
Plus a Public Service Announcement:
KEY section of Department of Defense's Law of War Manual is 18.3.2.1.
The VERY rule on the "requirement" to refuse illegal orders gives as its paradigmatic example of what is "clearly illegal:
"orders to fire upon the shipwrecked."
TFW the choice of hypothetical example in the law manual to illustrate the definition of a clearly illegal order is exactly the same as the actual scenario being “debated”, it’s time to give up hoping this is about legal interpretation or semantics.