Joe Thompson
@kensey.bsky.social
290 followers 230 following 1.1K posts
That guy in that place who does that thing.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
No idea, and the WSJ article doesn't appear to name the investors. Greenoaks led the round according to TechCrunch.
Well, to be fair, the "accessories" part *is* pretty vague and potentially covers a lot of ground. He could be supplying the local Walter White's glassware as "accessories" to the propane they're buying to cook with for all we know.
Also, black coffee having "almost no nutritional value" means it has no sugar, almost no fat, and negligible calories, so on balance unless you have certain health conditions a 12-oz black coffee is probably a better choice than say, soda or energy drinks with "nutritional value" only from sucrose.
Any chance somebody can contact Paul Rode about resurrecting his Watchface Generator site?
To kids it probably means nothing but "she was sick" or "she can't have a baby, that's sad". To adults who've gone through pregnancy loss or infertility it's an abrupt hammer to the forehead.
_Up_ has a blink-and-you-miss-it clip in the montage of the old man's married life where it's very clearly implied that his wife had a miscarriage and can no longer have children as a result.
(Actually, to be accurate, *clicking* it does nothing at all -- that text is a tooltip that appears as soon as the pointer reaches the icon in question.)
Oh, I haven't read the whole thing -- I feel like I've read the one thing Thiel writes enough times to not need to read it again. I'm just commenting on the juxtaposition of those two sentences in your screenshot.
Given that, a little sloppy self-contradiction almost seems minor to me...
To be fair, when they made the movie they took *a central part of the comic* (Dr. Manhattan is basically a god and can transmute matter and manipulate vast quantities of energy) and ignored it to make an energy crisis (that the comic explicitly negates as a concern) the *driving plot line*.
I'm pretty sure _Watchmen_ would have been impossible to write for anyone *not* routinely off their face on drugs.
Zoom Workplace's AI Companion panel on the home screen *looks* like it has a close/minimize toggle, but if you click it it just says "AI Companion always shows on the home screen".
Also a lot of cloud providers and such use it to make using things easier (e.g. "your new instance is ready, its hostname is foo dot example dot com [click to copy] and its public IP is xx.yy.zz.aa [click to copy]")
Specifically, a lot of web-based technical training platforms (Instruqt and the like) use this type of functionality so you don't have to retype or highlight and copy every command in the instructions.
Also if you embed ads from a third party, you should be required to put a standardized complaint button next to them that reports the ad directly to the FTC (or other relevant authority) and Cc's an admin address that belongs to you.
Pretending not to know that the ad service they chose to take money from is pushing scams and malware doesn't fly any more.
The website makes money renting the space, they can take responsibility for what they make money from (just as the ad service should be required to take responsibility for the ads they get paid to serve not being misleading or illegal).
"But it's a third-party ad network!" is no excuse (and hasn't been for quite some time), nor should be, any more than "but he said he wasn't drunk!" would be for a bartender who sat and watched a clearly drunk customer weave his car out of the parking lot onto a highway.
The website *has* control -- specifically, control over what broker or network it takes ads from, and they should vet them and not choose one pushing shady ads.
Weird Al is one of the few major celebrities I have not only never heard a bad story about, I've never heard there *are* bad stories about him.
The gap between "what government officials and employees are compelled or forbidden to do" and "what people assume is compelled or forbidden because it's how they remember things always working" is a yawning chasm.
Or "Presidential pardons go through a vetting process and candidates are assessed against certain criteria". That was a consensus that held across several administrations, but the President always had absolute pardon power for federal crimes; several Presidents just elected to put conditions on it.
A good-size chunk of that destruction is just ignoring consensus that's inconvenient. Like "the Senate votes on judicial nominees". What if they don't? "Well uh..." It was just always understood that the Senate would rarely fail to do that, until failing to do it became a strategy.