Kate Jackson
banner
katejackson.bsky.social
Kate Jackson
@katejackson.bsky.social

Associate Professor of Law at a regional midwest public law school. Political theory, corps & admin. 🧶👽👾🧙🏽‍♀️🦅🎮 My views are my own and reposts are not endorsements.

SSRN author page
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=3568227 .. more

Political science 37%
Law 28%

For instance, you may have wanted to be a poet but without an Econ course you’d have no idea that Trump has no idea what a “trade deficit” is

This will only get worse as schools (1) use “customer centered!” as a strategy that purports to respond effectively to the “demographic cliff” of fewer students graduating high school and (2) use “job skills!” as an argument to appease the insatiable appetites of anti-ed, MAGA legislatures.

Of course, if Costco and I had our own currencies, this arrangement might put some downward pressure on Katebucks but we don’t so it doesn’t matter.

My fav example is the question on the student evaluation: “is the prof knowledgeable in the subject matter? Rank 1-5.”
This is actually a good example of why the customer model is wrong.

I wouldn't have chosen poetry writing, but UNC made me take a class. And it absolutely made me become a much better writer, with an eye to concision and an ear now trained to the rhythm of words. I'm a better historian as a result.
If you are providing me with an education that is low utility in the world then it’s a disservice. My composition class spent four weeks on poetry. I’m sorry, but that only would’ve been useful if I wanted to be a poet. I don’t need to know iambic pentameter in order to be a victim advocate.

I have a trade deficit with Costco - in that I buy more from Costco than it buys from me - but happily I have a salary that keeps me in the black.
there is no available evidence that donald trump understands what a tariff is, what a trade deficit is, and what the national debt is.
The way Trump talks about the problems he caused by unilaterally imposing tariffs is fairly insane, even by his standards.

www.politico.com/news/2025/12...

Last but not least - it undermines oh you know the purpose of higher education as a civic democratic institution and making the ghost of John Dewey very very mad at you

- your students will chose the easy A over the slow boring of hard boards that is actual learning
- your intellectual property is being stolen
- you are serving the bottom line of private equity as you undermine your own job security
- it gives admin more reasons to lay off front line staff

Reposted by David S. Cohen

Reasons academics should contest universities’ AI campaigns: a manifesto
- chatbots are being trained to replace your teaching
- you are wasting time grading chatbot papers
- you are wasting time peer reviewing chatbot papers
- you are wasting time submitting papers reviewed by chatbots
there is no available evidence that donald trump understands what a tariff is, what a trade deficit is, and what the national debt is.
The way Trump talks about the problems he caused by unilaterally imposing tariffs is fairly insane, even by his standards.

www.politico.com/news/2025/12...

lol authors are using Trojan horses to make sure reviewer 2 has a change of heart

And I thought the worst of the peer review system was having Ai select appropriate peer reviewers (you’d be surprised at how many theoretical physicists are supposed experts on Adorno)

How could we, given the partisan gerrymandering. Sometimes I worry that the fix is in: SCOTUS purposely made congress less representative in order to bolster the dem credentials of the prez. And then I remember there are plenty of other real-life true conspiracy theories to worry about

It is fiduciary and other-regarding. It makes no conceptual sense unless someone else is writing the laws. And if you’re trying to do a good job implementing someone else’s laws, it makes perfect sense to bring in neutral experts & bipartisan commissions. They’re prolly better at it than you.

It’s custom-fit to a theory of populist strongman politics. When combined with MQD/non-delegation (which arrogates rulemaking power to the Court) it sets up a 2-branch government between king and court

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
Administration as Democratic Trustee Representation | Legal Theory | Cambridge Core
Administration as Democratic Trustee Representation - Volume 29 Issue 4
www.cambridge.org

Yup - it’s populist (in the theoretical, not rhetorical, sense) and like all populism, is very nasty to things like minority rights and dissent

I’ve argued the same here www.cambridge.org/core/journal... and here digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/law_review/5...
Administration as Democratic Trustee Representation | Legal Theory | Cambridge Core
Administration as Democratic Trustee Representation - Volume 29 Issue 4
www.cambridge.org
POLITICO: Do you believe the second strike was necessary?

TRUMP: Uhhhh. Well it looked like they were trying to turn back over the boat. But I don't get involved in that. That's up to them.

Reposted by Rebecca Tushnet

What a great day for a renewed spoils system:

(1) the constitutionality of merit-based civil service laws is questioned at SCOTUS

(2) Trump announces an arbitrary $12bn clientelistic payout to “farmers” (funding source and statutory authority TBD I guess)

Roscoe Conkling would be so proud

Yes!!

I was gonna ask - is notable soybean farmer Scott Bessent going to be getting a check?

lol authoritarianism is … intellectually generative ….

I think their game plan is to use (1) MQD/non-delegation and/or (2) 1st amendment lochnerism to kneecap democratic administrations (presuming there is one in the future)

The word you’re looking for is “clientelism”

Trump Promises Farmers $12 Billion to Blunt Fallout From His Trade War www.nytimes.com/2025/12/08/u...
Trump Promises Farmers $12 Billion to Blunt Fallout From His Trade War
www.nytimes.com

Netflix isn’t buying the CNN part

35 years ago, paramount tried to buy Time - and Time was allowed to fend off their bid by arguing that paramount (an entertainment company) would pose a threat to Time’s identity as a news organization.

I am curious to see what Warner Bros (CNN) does to fend off this new hostile tender offer

When they said “MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN” I dunno if he mean 1980s-style hostile takeover litigation
Nepo Mogul brings in Saudis, Jared Kushner and his ultra rich daddy who is pals with Trump to prove how “unfair” Netflix is. Hollywood could not write this nonsense: Paramount Makes Hostile Bid for Warner Bros. Discovery www.nytimes.com/2025/12/08/b...
Paramount Makes Hostile Bid for Warner Bros. Discovery
www.nytimes.com

I love that sauer’s parade of horribles — congress and the president together passing a statute creating an agency headed by multi-member bipartisan experts to pursue the public interest responsibly - is like my idea of really good government