Sophie OP
@edcrypt.bsky.social
180 followers 300 following 1K posts
❤️ Bruna e Dani 41 / Ela/Dela | She/Her #NoAI #NoCrypto
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Sophie OP
O engajamento traz dinheiro, então não importa como.

E como praticamente tudo no nosso modo de produção atual, foda-se todo mundo.

Vi um vídeo ótimo em q um cara fala como isso faz com que a gente viva com raiva, decepcionado.

A gente perde a fé.

Vou continuar desse pensamento aqui.
Reposted by Sophie OP
Viralizou um vídeo de uma mulher enterrando o cachorro dela no Monte Everest. Muitos milhões de views, muitos comentários. Boa parte puta da cara pq VC É MALUCA DE LEVAR SEU CACHORRO PRA UMA EXPEDIÇÃO? E outra parte apenas triste pelo dog.

Acontece que o vídeo não é real. É gerado pelo Sora.
Reposted by Sophie OP
AI is not popular, and AI users are unpleasant asshats

science shows as true what you thought was only 99% true

www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVf7... - video
pivottoai.libsyn.com/20251015-ai-... - podcast

time: 5 min 57 sec
people with big "wow!" smiles and VR headsets with tentacles coiled around their heads and necks
Reposted by Sophie OP
🚨 PROJETO APROVADO: VÍTIMA NÃO SUSTENTA AGRESSOR!

São revoltantes os casos de mulheres vítimas da violência doméstica sendo forçadas a pagar PENSÃO pros homens que as agrediram.

Por isso, acabamos de aprovar, na Comissão da Mulher, meu Projeto de Lei que PROÍBE essa prática. +👇🏽
Vocês vão me ver falando MUITO menos do golpe da vez se eu conseguir ir pra uma account com menos vítimas dele
Eventualmente eu mudo de projeto 😌
Pelo menos vão colocar meu pedido pra liderança com urgência
Eventualmente eu mudo de projeto 😌
Pelo menos vão colocar meu pedido pra liderança com urgência
Reposted by Sophie OP
kids teacher just sent this home as part of an assignment he's doing and i want to smash every computer at the school
Reposted by Sophie OP
Things that are fake:

- Alpha males (debunked by the original researcher)
- MSG causing headaches (never replicated)
- Learning styles (no evidence)

Things that are real:

- People will believe anything if it confirms their priors
Reposted by Sophie OP
Here is a guy who is one of the stupidest fucking people alive, who has been huffing his farts so long in a potemkin village full of sycophants that he can't perceive how much loser stink that statement has.
Reposted by Sophie OP
"Good news, everyone. We're going to try to stop it from getting you to kill yourself. Don't ask how. Also, you can fuck it. Don't ask why."

And the US is spending more on *that* than consumer spending. Every company relentlessly trying to cram *that* into their product. The government included.
Reposted by Sophie OP
So, Sam Altman knows this. He is aware that his competitors in the answer-shaped object machine market are all desperately trying to pivot to generating CSAM and seducing kids.

And, knowing this, he *first* addressed the issue of his robot causing people to kill themselves and annihilate families.
Reposted by Sophie OP
“It's Giving Enron - by Dave Karpf”

https://davekarpf.substack.com/p/its-giving-enron

> the AI bubble isn’t predominantly giving off Pets.com or Global Crossing vibes anymore. It’s giving Enron vibes

Been saying this for a while. They're gonna Enron this shit until it explodes all over us
Reposted by Sophie OP
Whenever people chide me for seeming angry - how SHOULD I feel? We are watching one company perpetuate obvious, blatant lies with NVIDIA, AMD and Broadcom, and it's being reported not simply as *reasonable*, but somehow revolutionary.
Reposted by Sophie OP
It’s not just bad morally, it’s also bad art. “Marilyn Monroe in Game of Thrones” has no point or purpose, it’s just a mad lib
I don't know how many times to point out that is absolutely ghoulish and non-consensual and disgusting behavior.
To exploit the image of a dead woman who was also exploited in real life so you can live out your momentary fantasies of "what is possible" with AI is bad science journalism, also.
Sick.
October 10, 2025

4 min read

Marilyn Monroe in Game of Thrones? AI Could Make It Happen Soon

Despite early, and familiar, copyright growing pains, Sora may be the prelude to AI-generated on-demand TV and movies

Screenshot includes an AI generated image of what looks like a human cross between Daenaerys Targaryen and Marilyn Monroe on the back of a dragon.
Reposted by Sophie OP
I know the headline everyone's running with is "erotica" but "we have been able to mitigate the serious mental health issues" and "we are putting personality back in ChatGPT so it will act like a friend" are diametrically opposed statements

that's the cause of most of the mental health issues
Oh good, ChatGPT is getting "erotica for verified adults" later this year
We made ChatGPT pretty restrictive to make sure we were being careful with mental health issues. We realize this made it less useful/enjoyable to many users who had no mental health problems, but given the seriousness of the issue we wanted to get this right.

Now that we have been able to mitigate the serious mental health issues and have new tools, we are going to be able to safely relax the restrictions in most cases.

In a few weeks, we plan to put out a new version of ChatGPT that allows people to have a personality that behaves more like what people liked about 4o (we hope it will be better!). If you want your ChatGPT to respond in a very human-like way, or use a ton of emoji, or act like a friend, ChatGPT should do it (but only if you want it, not because we are usage-maxxing).

In December, as we roll out age-gating more fully and as part of our “treat adult users like adults” principle, we will allow even more, like erotica for verified adults.
Reposted by Sophie OP
Why would anyone drag and drop a local file in front of their eyes when they could sign up and install an expensive cloud-hosted AI agent and type out a long, specific, English language command to move it?

gist.github.com/0xs34n/a5738...
The Death of the User Interface
The Death of the User Interface. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
gist.github.com
Reposted by Sophie OP
Choosing Marilyn Monroe as an example for this is a prime -- and dark -- demonstration of how AI slop's core purpose is the erasure of consent for everyone, from the artists whose work has been stolen to the performers the user turns into lifeless puppets
Some gross slop peddling here
Reposted by Sophie OP
In her life, Marilyn Monroe was exploited and abused by so many men.
Studio executives, so many people.
After she died, men continued to exploit her for their pleasure: trying to get themselves buried near/above her.
What your writer did here is obscene, nonconsensual and makes me feel slightly ill
Reposted by Sophie OP
Como a IA por si só não tá nem cobrindo os próprios gastos, a Meta decidiu que vai usar as conversas dos usuários com o chatbot pra personalizar os anúncios que ela mostra. Toda ideia de negócios do Zuckerberg é "tá, mas e se a gente invadisse a privacidade pra fazer anúncio direcionado?"
What an unsurprising decision by corporations that desperately need to make money with AI. If every other company with a chatbot isn't already doing this, then expect them to be following Meta's lead soon. The chatbot is not your friend; it's a corporate listening device. www.ft.com/content/22f7...

	Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found at https://www.ft.com/tour.
	https://www.ft.com/content/22f7afc3-8ac0-4ca1-9877-fd3f8ddcc986?desktop=true&segmentId=7c8f09b9-9b61-4fbb-9430-9208a9e233c8#myft:notification:daily-email:content

	Meta will use conversations people have with its chatbots to personalise advertising and content across its platforms, in a sign of how tech companies plan to make money from artificial intelligence.

The owner of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp on Wednesday said it would use the content of chats with its Meta AI to create advertising recommendations across its suite of apps.

“People will already expect that their Meta AI interactions are being used for these personalisation purposes,” said Christy Harris, privacy and data policy manager at Meta.
Reposted by Sophie OP
Reposted by Sophie OP
every big AI pitch is like “what if we took away your means of survival and devalued all your skills to make stonks go up temporarily? You’d like that wouldn’t you?”
Reposted by Sophie OP
What an unsurprising decision by corporations that desperately need to make money with AI. If every other company with a chatbot isn't already doing this, then expect them to be following Meta's lead soon. The chatbot is not your friend; it's a corporate listening device. www.ft.com/content/22f7...

	Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found at https://www.ft.com/tour.
	https://www.ft.com/content/22f7afc3-8ac0-4ca1-9877-fd3f8ddcc986?desktop=true&segmentId=7c8f09b9-9b61-4fbb-9430-9208a9e233c8#myft:notification:daily-email:content

	Meta will use conversations people have with its chatbots to personalise advertising and content across its platforms, in a sign of how tech companies plan to make money from artificial intelligence.

The owner of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp on Wednesday said it would use the content of chats with its Meta AI to create advertising recommendations across its suite of apps.

“People will already expect that their Meta AI interactions are being used for these personalisation purposes,” said Christy Harris, privacy and data policy manager at Meta.
Reposted by Sophie OP
Discworld QOTD, from Monstrous Regiment

“Keep out of the way of officers, ‘cos they ain’t healthy. That’s what you learn in the army. The enemy dun’t really want to fight you, ‘cos the enemy is mostly blokes like you who want to go home with all their bits still on. But officers’ll get you killed.”
Discworld QOTD, from Hogfather
The late (or at least severely delayed) Bergholt Stuttley Johnson was generally recognized as the worst inventor in the world, yet in a very specialized sense. Merely bad inventors made things that failed to operate. He wasn’t among these small fry.  Any fool could make something that did absolutely nothing when you pressed the button.  He scorned such fumble-fingered amateurs.  Everything he built worked. It just didn’t do what it said on the box. If you wanted a small ground-to-air missile, you asked Johnson to design an ornamental fountain.