Dell C. "DC" Toedt III
dctoedt.bsky.social
Dell C. "DC" Toedt III
@dctoedt.bsky.social
Now: (Mostly:) Part-time law prof. (course: advanced contract drafting); tech/IP attorney. Before: BigLaw partner, GC of public software company. TX, CA bars. Ex-Navy (USS Enterprise nuke SWO). Last name pronounced "Tate." https://www.OnContracts.com/About
Reposted by Dell C. "DC" Toedt III
“Supreme Court reform is now the sine qua non of any reformist program in the United States, any program to re-implant/re-secure civic democracy in the United States.” talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/court...
Court Reform: Breaking the Corrupt Rule of the Six GOPers Is Everything
I’ve become something of a broken record on this. But repetition sometimes...
talkingpointsmemo.com
December 8, 2025 at 8:30 PM
Reposted by Dell C. "DC" Toedt III
The Trump administration has made me a flagrant moralist in a way that has led me to tossing aside years of snark, and you know, I'm good with that. It's time to talk about what being a good person means; about why it's good to signal virtue, why it's good to press for values, not spectacle.
we all got cowed into avoiding "virtue signaling" as if the public affirmation of socially agreed upon ethical principles was somehow cringey instead of a significant part of what a "society" even is. now all there's left is vice signaling, and it's reshaping society.
December 8, 2025 at 6:20 PM
Reposted by Dell C. "DC" Toedt III
If they go for this, then it will establish legal precedent for the "spoils system"--the "to the victor belong the spoils of the enemy"--the thing where a president controls all offices of government and doles them out in exchange for loyalty or large sums of money. Corruption, in other words.
December 8, 2025 at 6:22 PM
Reposted by Dell C. "DC" Toedt III
the idea that a handful of conservative legal scholars have an understanding that should supersede a settlement affirmed my generations of american is astoundingly arrogant, and the idea that trump — or any president — can unilaterally overturn that settlement is just despotism
December 7, 2025 at 7:18 PM
Reposted by Dell C. "DC" Toedt III
Elon Musk’s X found a reason to disable the ad account of the EU Commission.
December 7, 2025 at 10:55 PM
Reposted by Dell C. "DC" Toedt III
The 14th Amendment says that all people born in America, regardless of race are citizens and have a right to equal protection under the law. For SCOTUS to be remotely confused on that text speaks to their racism, not the Constitution (1/3) www.cnn.com/2025/12/05/p...
Supreme Court agrees to decide if Trump may end birthright citizenship | CNN Politics
The Supreme Court agreed Friday to decide if President Donald Trump’s attempt to end birthright citizenship with an executive order is constitutional, offering the justices an opportunity to revisit w...
www.cnn.com
December 5, 2025 at 10:57 PM
Reposted by Dell C. "DC" Toedt III
From the @wsj.com chief foreign correspondent
December 7, 2025 at 9:42 AM
Litigating to state S.Ct. — over a cat ....

Ex-wife waits nearly 7 years to ask ex-H for their 18-y.o. cat; he says "no." (Divorce agreement gave her 21 days.)

In unpublished decision, Mont. S.Ct. affirms that the wife forfeited her right to Yasmine. #Contracts

law.justia.com/cases/montan...
Marriage of Burgard & Jacobsen
This case involves a dispute between two formerly married individuals regarding possession of their cat, Yasmine, following their divorce in 2015. Their Marital Property Settlement Agreement (MPSA) specified that the wife would be awarded possession of the cat, but the husband would care for Yasmine until the wife requested possession. If the husband’s new residence did not permit cats after the sale of the marital home, he was required to notify the wife, who then had 20 days to take custody or arrange for the cat’s care. After the marital home was sold in 2016, the husband notified the wife, but she was unable to take possession or arrange care for Yasmine immediately and requested more time. The husband agreed to a short extension, but the wife did not act within that period, and the cat remained with the husband. Several years later, in 2023, the wife sought custody of Yasmine, but the husband refused, claiming she had forfeited her rights under the MPSA.
law.justia.com
December 7, 2025 at 12:26 PM
Reposted by Dell C. "DC" Toedt III
As awful as this, the focus on whether the woman was complying obscures the more important issue: in a democracy, there should not be armed agents demanding to see papers of every passing person.
“Traumatized, humiliated, degraded.”

The nurse, a US citizen, 4’11”, 85 lbs, says she was following orders when she was dragged out of her car by masked immigration agents in Florida.

It was the 3rd time she had been stopped and told to produce ID.

Free link ⤵️
www.miamiherald.com/news/local/i...
Exclusive: Woman detained by feds in Keys says she was following agents’ orders
“This is not the America that I grew up in, and this is not the America that we represent.”
www.miamiherald.com
December 6, 2025 at 3:27 PM
Reposted by Dell C. "DC" Toedt III
It's the plain text of the Constitution, not a "longstanding principle"

Don't. Print. Lies. In. The. Newspapers. Or. Online.
npr.org NPR @npr.org · 3d
The Supreme Court will ultimately decide whether to uphold the longstanding principle that grants citizenship to the children of non-citizens born in the U.S., following a legal challenge by the Trump administration. n.pr/48E1oko
Supreme Court agrees to hear arguments in birthright citizenship challenge
The Supreme Court will ultimately decide whether to uphold the longstanding principle that grants citizenship to the children of non-citizens born in the U.S., following a legal challenge by the Trump administration.
n.pr
December 6, 2025 at 4:00 PM
Reposted by Dell C. "DC" Toedt III
November 28, 2025 at 6:16 PM
Reposted by Dell C. "DC" Toedt III
Q: Do you plan to attend Sarah's funeral?

TRUMP: I haven't thought about it yet, but it's certainly something I can conceive of. I love West Virginia. You know, I won West Virginia by one of the biggest margins of any president anywhere.
November 28, 2025 at 12:54 AM
Reposted by Dell C. "DC" Toedt III
. @rbreich.bsky.social explains how we can neuter Citizens United through the states, without changing the Constitution or requiring all 50 states to sign on. It sounds like a great idea to me.

www.rawstory.com/citizens-uni...
This grassroots rebellion can decapitate Supreme Court's catastrophic mistake
Several of you have told me that the first step out of the mess we’re in is to get rid of the Supreme Court’s bonkers Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission decision of 2010, which held that c...
www.rawstory.com
November 24, 2025 at 8:00 PM
Reposted by Dell C. "DC" Toedt III
Joining @morningjoe-msnow.bsky.social at the top of the 6ET to discuss this article I wrote last night. www.thebulwark.com/p/what-ameri...
What Americans Should Understand About the Military Disobeying Illegal Orders
And why it matters there are two military oaths.
www.thebulwark.com
November 21, 2025 at 10:58 AM
Reposted by Dell C. "DC" Toedt III
This is why Charlie Kirk hysteria was utterly insincere. MAGA has no problem with political violence against its enemies
"Deadly serious." Sen. Schumer addresses the Senate on political violence and rhetoric calling for execution.

#Schumer #PoliticalViolence #Senate #Trump #Rhetoric
November 20, 2025 at 7:42 PM
Reposted by Dell C. "DC" Toedt III
This is an accidentally honest answer. What she's saying in code is:
"The President is a misogynist, petulant bully. You've all seen him be a misogynist, petulant bully. And lots of voters out there are also misogynist or petulant or bullies and that's why they like him."
Q: What did the president mean when he called a reporter "piggy"?

LEAVITT: Look, the president is very frank & honest with everyone in this room. You'll all seen it yourself. You've all experienced it yourselves. And I think it's one of the many reasons the American people reelected this president
November 20, 2025 at 7:17 PM
Reposted by Dell C. "DC" Toedt III
Use Rule IX for an impeachment vote. When it fails, do it again. And again. And again. Deny every unanimous consent. Appeal every point of order including ones you just made up. Make every vote be recorded. Be unruly and disorderly. Call Johnson a scumbag traitor on the floor, and then keep going.
November 20, 2025 at 6:39 PM
Reposted by Dell C. "DC" Toedt III
Reposted by Dell C. "DC" Toedt III
Golden touch?! He went bankrupt six fucking times!
November 14, 2025 at 12:23 PM
Reposted by Dell C. "DC" Toedt III
Those 29% are basically just saying “I like Donald Trump.”

If the question had been ‘POTUS has outlawed the color lilac and says eating belly button fluff cures leukemia, do you agree?” you’d have gotten pretty much the same %.
Only 29% of Americans support using the U.S. military to kill suspected drug traffickers without a judge or court being involved, a rebuke of President Donald Trump's strikes in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific Ocean, a Reuters/Ipsos poll found.

www.reuters.com/world/us/jus...
www.reuters.com
November 14, 2025 at 12:42 PM
Reposted by Dell C. "DC" Toedt III
How a lone submission by a Georgetown Law Professor Might Defeat the Administration in Trump v. Illinois
The Little Amicus Brief That Could
How a lone submission by a Georgetown Law Professor Might Defeat the Administration in Trump v. Illinois
harrylitman.substack.com
November 13, 2025 at 6:51 PM
Reposted by Dell C. "DC" Toedt III
I got this useful bon mot from a middle school teacher recently.

In response to, “I DONT UNDERSTAND,” he calmly said, “okay what steps have you taken to understand?”

And that’s when I realized that a lot of folks have no steps.
November 10, 2025 at 6:05 PM
Reposted by Dell C. "DC" Toedt III
Trying to figure out what #SCOTUS just did with #SNAP, and why Justice Jackson temporarily froze the district court's ruling?

Via "One First," me on what's going on—and why I think Jackson's move was savvy, notwithstanding the awful circumstances that forced it:

www.stevevladeck.com/p/190-snap-wtf
190. SNAP WTF?
A very quick explainer on what (and why) Justice Jackson issued an "administrative stay" in the SNAP case late on Friday night, and on what's likely to happen next
www.stevevladeck.com
November 8, 2025 at 3:34 AM