banner
LightNews
cubesteven.bsky.social
Steven (Cube) he/him
@cubesteven.bsky.social
190 followers 340 following 3.8K posts
That’s about it.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
cubesteven.bsky.social
Steven (Cube) he/him @cubesteven.bsky.social · Dec 8
Hey folks. It’s a new platform so I’m a little bit wary of following back everyone who follows me.

I hope you understand.
2 10
cubesteven.bsky.social
Steven (Cube) he/him @cubesteven.bsky.social · 1h
The Vatican hoards enough wealth and facilities that they could feed the world and give everyone free health care.

But they don’t.

Instead the pope protects pedophiles. Just like the last two.

Stop trying to polish this turd of a man.
richraho.bsky.social
Rich Raho @richraho.bsky.social · 1d
Pope to Chicago Labor Leaders: “Please know of my appreciation for your welcome of immigrants and refugees, especially your support of food pantries and shelters….I encourage you to continue to advocate for society to respect the human dignity of the most vulnerable.” www.vatican.va/content/leo-...
cubesteven.bsky.social
Steven (Cube) he/him @cubesteven.bsky.social · 5h
1. Had anyone defined “scholar” in this context?

2. What is your evidence for “widely accepted”?

Every time I dig into someone claiming consensus over “historical Jesus” no one can ever seem to actually provide data.
cubesteven.bsky.social
Steven (Cube) he/him @cubesteven.bsky.social · 19h
Nope. I’ve taken a position.
cubesteven.bsky.social
Steven (Cube) he/him @cubesteven.bsky.social · 19h
Nope.
cubesteven.bsky.social
Steven (Cube) he/him @cubesteven.bsky.social · 19h
That’s bot language.
cubesteven.bsky.social
Steven (Cube) he/him @cubesteven.bsky.social · 19h
Awww. Buddy.
cubesteven.bsky.social
Steven (Cube) he/him @cubesteven.bsky.social · 19h
Nope.
1
cubesteven.bsky.social
Steven (Cube) he/him @cubesteven.bsky.social · 19h
And there’s another example of attacks aren’t arguments.

You can’t address what I’ve actually said.

So you propose I’m a bot.
1
cubesteven.bsky.social
Steven (Cube) he/him @cubesteven.bsky.social · 19h
It’s a rejection of your argument due to lack of evidence.
1
cubesteven.bsky.social
Steven (Cube) he/him @cubesteven.bsky.social · 19h
I’ve already discussed your “definition”.
2
cubesteven.bsky.social
Steven (Cube) he/him @cubesteven.bsky.social · 19h
Attacks aren’t arguments.
1
cubesteven.bsky.social
Steven (Cube) he/him @cubesteven.bsky.social · 19h
Except that’s all it is.
cubesteven.bsky.social
Steven (Cube) he/him @cubesteven.bsky.social · 19h
Nope.
cubesteven.bsky.social
Steven (Cube) he/him @cubesteven.bsky.social · 19h
It doesn’t contradict.
1
cubesteven.bsky.social
Steven (Cube) he/him @cubesteven.bsky.social · 19h
I don’t care who follows me.
1
cubesteven.bsky.social
Steven (Cube) he/him @cubesteven.bsky.social · 19h
Nope.
2
cubesteven.bsky.social
Steven (Cube) he/him @cubesteven.bsky.social · 19h
Nope.
cubesteven.bsky.social
Steven (Cube) he/him @cubesteven.bsky.social · 19h
It is the sum of atheism.

Not being a theist.
1 1
cubesteven.bsky.social
Steven (Cube) he/him @cubesteven.bsky.social · 20h
Fucking prove it, asshole.
cubesteven.bsky.social
Steven (Cube) he/him @cubesteven.bsky.social · 20h
Nope.
1
cubesteven.bsky.social
Steven (Cube) he/him @cubesteven.bsky.social · 20h
You’re trying to hold atheism to account for a subset of atheism (and theism).
1
cubesteven.bsky.social
Steven (Cube) he/him @cubesteven.bsky.social · 20h
Nope.
1
cubesteven.bsky.social
Steven (Cube) he/him @cubesteven.bsky.social · 20h
Atheism isn’t philosophical.
1
cubesteven.bsky.social
Steven (Cube) he/him @cubesteven.bsky.social · 20h
Any syllogism you can give that proves your claim.

Subset=\=the thing.
1
cubesteven.bsky.social
Steven (Cube) he/him @cubesteven.bsky.social · 20h
They do though.
1