Chris Grey
@chrisgrey.bsky.social
35K followers 730 following 1.3K posts
Emeritus Prof of Organization Studies, Royal Holloway University of London, ex-Prof Warwick & Cambridge. FAcSS, FRHistS. Now mainly analysis of Brexit including Brexit & Beyond Blog. Author Brexit Unfolded (Biteback, 2021, 2023). Elsewhere @chrisgreybrexit
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
chrisgrey.bsky.social
So it's now 7 years since the vote to leave the EU. For a detailed account & analysis of what happened from the day after that, see my book, "Brexit Unfolded: How no one got what they wanted (and why they were never going to)" (2nd, updated, edition 2023): www.bitebackpublishing.com/books/brexit...
chrisgrey.bsky.social
The point of the RC idea is to begin to create a process whereby the possibility of that 'hissy fit' is eventually taken away. That's way it has to be, in the first instance, a domestic process.
chrisgrey.bsky.social
It's not "exceptionalism" (an over-used & often lazily applied term) for the UK to have a much-needed internal review of what it did to itself with Brexit, and in fact would be a necessary prelude for any serious discussion with the EU about the future.
chrisgrey.bsky.social
And then leave again if the GE after that is won on a manifesto commitment to leave? Sorry, but that's totally unrealistic.
Reposted by Chris Grey
chrischirp.bsky.social
After a long pause, I've just done another England Covid & NHS update as we head into the autumn/winter season.

TLDR: we're in a significant Covid wave now, the NHS is stretched, get boosted if you're eligible.

christinapagel.substack.com/p/england-is...
England is now experiencing a significant Covid wave, after 10 months of relative quiet
The latest Covid situation in England and a look at where NHS services are as we head into winter
christinapagel.substack.com
chrisgrey.bsky.social
That wouldn't be politically possible now. The circumstances are completely different.
chrisgrey.bsky.social
a) because the political meaning in the UK of joining SM is *totally* different to CPTPP b) because w/out Ref it becomes perfect plausible for a future HMG just to leave without one, making it untenable for EU to accept but also foolish for 'rejoiners' to suggest
Reposted by Chris Grey
centreeuropeanref.bsky.social
@antonspisak.bsky.social of the @centreeuropeanref.bsky.social, a think-tank, observes that, after Brexit took effect at the end of 2020, Britain’s goods exports have grown less than those of any other economy in the G7 club of rich countries.
A dangerous post-Brexit world
Britain risks being an unwitting victim of EU-US trade wars
buff.ly
chrisgrey.bsky.social
There's literally zero possibility of doing that without a referendum (even leaving aside whether it could be agreed externally). And please don't say 'but the 2016 Ref didn't specify what Brexit meant'. I know. But that ship has long sailed.
chrisgrey.bsky.social
It wouldn't need a Ref, perhaps, but it would break such a cast iron manifesto commitment as to need far more than "political backbone", and, on the other side of the coin, would anyway be questionable as a credible response to the economic damage of Brexit. There really isn't an easy fix.
chrisgrey.bsky.social
Which, to date, has been their approach. But it doesn't enable them to make the attack on Farage that's under discussion here.
chrisgrey.bsky.social
And, to spell it out, the only credible answer to that would mean turning British politics upside down again with another Referendum, which isn't, politically, an option. So there's an impasse.
chrisgrey.bsky.social
Maybe. But, if so, the issue for Labour will be what it always has been on this: they can't (credibly) say that leaving the EU was damaging without having a (credible) answer to the question: what is the solution?
chrisgrey.bsky.social
Simon Calder's reporting on the travel impact of Brexit has been good, but the strangely-worded final line of this ("under the Brexit deal, Boris Johnson’s government negotiated for UK passport holders to become third-country nationals") suggests that, even now, Brexit isn't really understood.
Reposted by Chris Grey
davidallengreen.bsky.social
This is a timely, excellent and important report on how "arms length" bodies in UK are vulnerable to political manipulation.

Kudos @chrischirp.bsky.social and @martinmckee.bsky.social for putting this together.
chrischirp.bsky.social
🧵🚨

The UK’s independent scientific bodies are highly vulnerable to politicisation - over the past 5 months I've been working with @martinmckee.bsky.social to map out their vulnerabilities and it's not good news.

Today our report is published!
www.ucl.ac.uk/policy-lab/n...

1/11
UK’s arm’s length public bodies are highly vulnerable to politicisation
Seven in ten Britons say it is important for top scientific institutions to be independent in exclusive new polling.
www.ucl.ac.uk
Reposted by Chris Grey
rolandmcs.bsky.social
I see Robert Jenrick is supporting Hamit Coskun who is appealing his conviction by reference to the ECHR (which Jenrick wants to withdraw from).

Who knew that the ECHR could be useful, even to the anti-ECHR Hard Right?
Reposted by Chris Grey
aliceolilly.bsky.social
Really interesting- and, I think, welcome- to see MPs sharing this kind of data about casework.

Casework is largely invisible (other than to the constituents it helps!) compared to what MPs do in the Commons chamber but is a huge part of MPs’ workload, and it’s really hard to get robust data on it
Reposted by Chris Grey
nialloconghaile.bsky.social
1. This does not target the UK

2. This is clear evidence of being inside a customs union rather than floating alone

3. It was inevitable that Trump's actions at the head of such a large economy would result in dumping elsewhere.. Europe has to be able to take action to counter that.
Reposted by Chris Grey
stevepeers.bsky.social
The rules apply to any non-EU citizens not covered by free movement law, not just British citizens. All these possible penalties for overstay already exist.

Brexity folks are allowed to worship British border controls; but the EU is not supposed to enforce theirs against Brits.
goodclimate.bsky.social
People breaking immigration law can be deported. EVEN IF THEY'RE BRITISH.
Reposted by Chris Grey
jdportes.bsky.social
I hope and believe that most of my fellow Jews will join me in saying that it is sickening that anyone should justify this outpouring of execrable racist bile by claiming that it's for our sake.
igmansfield.bsky.social
Outstanding piece by Stephen Daisley.

Ethnicity is no barrier to Britishness - it's culture and integration.

That means 'smaller cohorts and aggressive integration policies' - and tackling the institutions that 'have amplified grievance narratives and radical anti-Western ideologies'.
chrisgrey.bsky.social
Surely we need more not fewer anthropologists if we're going to have a proper culture war? And if it is to be a performative one about social integration into English language and culture, then the other disciplines she mentions will have their uses in the future she envisages, too.
ottoenglish.bsky.social
Badenoch and Co see education only as a means to a massive income in some soul destroying career.

Devoid of imagination and the power of knowledge they view life entirely through the prism of the CV.

My advice always is to study what interests you and the rest will follow
chrisgrey.bsky.social
There's also something disgusting about a qualified solicitor, so it can't have been said from ignorance, suggesting, as Jenrick did today, that barristers' beliefs and values can be deduced from those of their clients.
chrisgrey.bsky.social
It's dangerous and it's also incoherent: I heard Jenrick saying today that when judges don the wig it symbolizes the point they leave personal views & identifications aside. Fine, but this makes his claim (if even true) that some judges have 'links' with immigrants' charities utterly irrelevant.
timbale.bsky.social
If you can't see how this will end, then you're not paying attention (not least to what's going on on the other side of the Atlantic).
chrisgrey.bsky.social
Dubai seems to have become the new Singapore for Brexiters, even as they flog the rest of us to show obeisance to 'British values'.
sundersays.bsky.social
Party donor Nick Candy says "I cherish the values we grew up with here in the West. But today you are more likely to find the values we grew up with in Dubai and Abu Dhabi.’

Via Sam Leith in the Spectator
www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-...
chrisgrey.bsky.social
Just listened to report on today's debates about 'integration' on R4 news. Fair enough as a report, but a depressing illustration of how those debates conflate & confuse issues of (undefined) values, culture, colour, religion, nationality, locality & birthplace. So the 'debate' never goes anywhere.