The transatlantic relationship as we know it is over. Yes, we kinda knew this. But this is now official US White House policy. Not a sppech, not a statement. The West as it used to be no longer exists.
On a new Tech Policy Podcast, @corbinkbarthold.bsky.social heads over to the @techdirt.com Podcast, hosted by the one and only @mmasnick.bsky.social, for a wide-ranging discussion about the state of social media.
podcast.techfreedom.org/episodes/425...
and exporting the MAGA revolution, as the new 🇺🇸 National Security Strategy makes clear. "Free speech" just makes it sound a tad less racist
and exporting the MAGA revolution, as the new 🇺🇸 National Security Strategy makes clear. "Free speech" just makes it sound a tad less racist
Trump’s actions and ideology seek to reverse those gains.
Here’s the history he’d like to reverse www.ifyoucankeepit.org/p/the-oldest...
Trump’s actions and ideology seek to reverse those gains.
Here’s the history he’d like to reverse www.ifyoucankeepit.org/p/the-oldest...
- labeling is censorship
- fact-checking is censorship
- transparency is censorship
- research is censorship
What they’re doing is redefining anything that might inconvenience a hard-right populist as censorship.
don't fall for it.
- labeling is censorship
- fact-checking is censorship
- transparency is censorship
- research is censorship
What they’re doing is redefining anything that might inconvenience a hard-right populist as censorship.
Appropriately, it is the chaos of a system that supports free speech that gives rise to the grand process of democratic self-governance and the ideally upward arc of human progress and flourishing.
Yesterday a Stoppard play, today a tweet.
Appropriately, it is the chaos of a system that supports free speech that gives rise to the grand process of democratic self-governance and the ideally upward arc of human progress and flourishing.
Yesterday a Stoppard play, today a tweet.
I'm saying that it's become a grotesque Mike-Benz-adjacent parody...
I'm saying that it's become a grotesque Mike-Benz-adjacent parody...
Gorsuch and Grassley should be so proud.
Of course, under Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), both are protected by the First Amendment because neither ”is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action"
Of course, under Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), both are protected by the First Amendment because neither ”is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action"
www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/1...
www.theguardian.com/media/2025/n...
www.theguardian.com/media/2025/n...
www.thebulwark.com/p/america-he...
www.thebulwark.com/p/america-he...
Obeying the DSA isn't unfair or deceptive: techfreedom.org/wp-content/u...
And the DSA ≠ censorship husovec.eu/wp-content/u...
Obeying the DSA isn't unfair or deceptive: techfreedom.org/wp-content/u...
And the DSA ≠ censorship husovec.eu/wp-content/u...
@markhertling.bsky.social on the military and illegal orders: www.thebulwark.com/p/what-ameri...
@markhertling.bsky.social on the military and illegal orders: www.thebulwark.com/p/what-ameri...