Tatsuya Amano
LightNews LightNews
banner
tatsuya-amano.bsky.social
Tatsuya Amano
@tatsuya-amano.bsky.social
1.6K followers 1K following 160 posts

Conservation scientist @uq-cbcs.bsky.social committed to overcoming biases and barriers in conservation and science. See
http://translatesciences.com
http://kaizenconservation.com
he/him

Videos
Environmental science 64%
Geography 16%
Posts Replies Media Videos
Pinned
tatsuya-amano.bsky.social
Tatsuya Amano @tatsuya-amano.bsky.social · Jan 6
Here is our OA review of the overlooked yet significant consequences of #languagebarriers in #conservation. An outcome based on 5 years of work at our translatE project, supported by over 130 collaborators around the world.
@cp-trendsecolevo.bsky.social
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
1/4
Language barriers in conservation: consequences and solutions
Language barriers can severely hinder the advance of conservation science and its contribution to addressing the biodiversity crisis. We build a frame…
www.sciencedirect.com

Reposted by Tatsuya Amano, Colin M. Beale, Markus P. Eichhorn

philmartin.bsky.social
Phil Martin @philmartin.bsky.social · 1d
What do you think the primary goal of applied ecological/conservation research is?

1️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/PuXpIV/1" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">Diagnose threats and impacts
2️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/PuXpIV/2" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">Understand ecological processes
3️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/PuXpIV/3" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">Inform management or policy
4️⃣ <a href="https://poll.blue/p/PuXpIV/4" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">Something else (comment below)

📊 Show results

Reposted by Tatsuya Amano

scboceania.org
Society for Conservation Biology Oceania @scboceania.org · 2d
Stay on the line after our AGM for a talk from @tatsuya-amano.bsky.social, Associate Professor at UQ and the chair of ICCB 2025's Language Accessibility Subcommittee. We were blown away by the live translation in all rooms at #ICCB2025 and can't wait to hear how it all came about!

tatsuya-amano.bsky.social
Tatsuya Amano @tatsuya-amano.bsky.social · 6d
How English-centric metrics distort global scientific productivity - a nice coverage of our recent paper (doi.org/10.1371/jour...) in @plosbiology.org
www.the-scientist.com/how-english-...
#languagebarriers
How English-Centric Metrics Distort Global Scientific Productivity
New research shows how language and income shape who gets credited for scientific output—and why women and non-native English speakers face persistent gaps.
www.the-scientist.com

Reposted by Tatsuya Amano, Veli‐Matti Karhulahti

jpolonen.bsky.social
Janne Pölönen @jpolonen.bsky.social · 24d
📢 Register for the 5th Helsinki Initiative webinar (8 December) on Multilingualism in Scholarly Communication with presentations by @tatsuya-amano.bsky.social, @karenstroobants.bsky.social and Andre Brasil!

More information and registration: www.helsinki-initiative.org/en/events/5t...

Reposted by Tatsuya Amano, Samuele Ramellini

elizeyxng.bsky.social
Elize Ng @elizeyxng.bsky.social · 27d
Why are Procellariiform seabirds most diverse in the Southern Hemisphere?

Our study found that wind patterns and time since evolutionary origin best explain the extratropical peak in breeding species richness of these remarkable seabirds. 🐦💨

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...

Reposted by Tatsuya Amano, Ana Nuño

teresacatry.bsky.social
Teresa Catry @teresacatry.bsky.social · Oct 21
Extremelly happy that our project BirdRice was approved for funding! We will keep studying the relationships between #waterbirds and #ricefields while trying to solve human-wildlife conflicts.
#ornithology #tracking #connectivity #agriculture #conservation
@cienciasulisboa.bsky.social
BirdDRice: Reconciling agriculture with biodiversity conservation: functional equivalence and connectivity between natural wetlands and rice fields as waterbird habitats

Reposted by Tatsuya Amano

uq-cbcs.bsky.social
UQ Centre for Biodiversity & Conservation Science @uq-cbcs.bsky.social · Oct 14
In a recently published Conservation Letters perspective paper, Carissa Klein and colleagues from UQ explore Australia’s long-standing claims of global leadership in marine conservation.

Read the paper here: doi.org/10.1111/conl...
Marine Conservation Leadership: Does Australia Walk the Talk?
The conservation of Australia's extraordinary marine biodiversity has been prominently championed over the past three decades by successive Federal and State Governments, who have consistently portra...
doi.org

Reposted by Tatsuya Amano

oceanhelen.bsky.social
Prof Helen Bostock @oceanhelen.bsky.social · Oct 11
Diversity in research. How can we take into account the extra burden of publishing in English for those who are not native speakers? With AI can we now translate and look at publications from any language? @tatsuya-amano.bsky.social
Who gets to do science? A demand for English is hurting marginalised researchers
Everyone, no matter their background, should have an equal chance to work in science – but there are huge systemic barriers.
theconversation.com

tatsuya-amano.bsky.social
Tatsuya Amano @tatsuya-amano.bsky.social · Sep 24
When considering non-English-language papers:
-25% for male non-native English speakers
-1% for male non-native English speakers from low-income countries
compared to male native English speakers from a high-income country.
Scientific productivity gap for men based on English and non-English papers. Shown are % differences in the number of peer-reviewed papers compared to male native English speakers from a high-income country. The number of years in research is aligned with female counterparts (30 for English non-native and 24 for English non-native & low income).

tatsuya-amano.bsky.social
Tatsuya Amano @tatsuya-amano.bsky.social · Sep 24
For those interested to see the productivity gap for men, here are the figures using the same # years in research as female counterparts. Based on English papers:
-50% for English non-native
-58% for English non-native from low-income countries
compared to English native from a high-income country.
Scientific productivity gap for men based on English papers. Shown are % differences in the number of peer-reviewed papers compared to male native English speakers from a high-income country. The number of years in research is aligned with female counterparts (30 for English non-native and 24 for English non-native & low income). (A) Absolute difference in the number of English-language peer-reviewed papers published between male native English speakers from a high-income country (baseline shown in pink) and male non-native English speakers from a high-income country (solid line in navy), and male non-native English speakers from a lower-middle income country (dashed line in navy). Here, non-native English speakers are defined as those with low English proficiency. (B) Absolute difference in the number of English- and non-English-language peer-reviewed papers published between researchers with the same combinations of the two attributes as (A). (C) Percentage difference in the number of English-language peer-reviewed papers published between researchers with the same combinations of the two attributes as (A). (D) Percentage difference in the number of English- and non-English-language peer-reviewed papers published between researchers with the same combinations of the two attributes as (A).

tatsuya-amano.bsky.social
Tatsuya Amano @tatsuya-amano.bsky.social · Sep 24
Thanks and a great point! It's somewhere in the middle but for accurate estimates I need to do some calculations...

Reposted by Tatsuya Amano

Reposted by Tatsuya Amano, Flavia Montaño‐Centellas

plosbiology.org
PLOS Biology @plosbiology.org · Sep 19
How do your #linguistic, #economic & #gender backgrounds impact your #scientific productivity? @tatsuya-amano.bsky.social & co reveal that being a woman, a non-native English speaker, and from a low-income country is associated with a 70% reduction in productivity @plosbiology.org 🧪 plos.io/4n3RLRQ
Scientific productivity gap based on English-language peer-reviewed papers. Shown are the maximum % differences in the number of peer-reviewed papers published by female native English speakers from a high-income country (-45%), female non-native English speakers from a high-income country (-60%), and female non-native English speakers from a lower-middle income country (-70%), compared to male native English speakers from a high-income country (red flag). Credit: Tatsuya Amano

tatsuya-amano.bsky.social
Tatsuya Amano @tatsuya-amano.bsky.social · Sep 19
Read our Conversation piece on our new paper (doi.org/10.1371/jour...) here:
theconversation.com/who-gets-to-...
#languagebarriers
@aunz.theconversation.com
Who gets to do science? A demand for English is hurting marginalised researchers
Everyone, no matter their background, should have an equal chance to work in science – but there are huge systemic barriers.
theconversation.com

tatsuya-amano.bsky.social
Tatsuya Amano @tatsuya-amano.bsky.social · Sep 19
このような格差の数値化は、あくまで問題解決への第一歩に過ぎません。構造的な障壁を取り除くには、科学のあり方そのものを根本的に見直す必要があるでしょう。例えば、AI利用によって誰もが自分の言語で論文を発表し、読めるような未来を実現することができるかもしれません。このアイデアについては下記論文で検討しています：
doi.org/10.1371/jour...
5/5
AI-mediated translation presents two possible futures for academic publishing in a multilingual world
As the availability and performance of AI for language editing and translation continues to improve, we can imagine a future in which everyone can use their own language to write, assess and read scie...
doi.org

tatsuya-amano.bsky.social
Tatsuya Amano @tatsuya-amano.bsky.social · Sep 19
一つの対策として、研究者の業績を評価する際に、英語論文のみに基づいた指標の利用をやめることが挙げられるでしょう。DORA（https://sfdora.org/）が提唱しているように、研究がどこで発表されたかではなく、その内容自体に注目した研究者の評価が重要だと考えられます。4/5

tatsuya-amano.bsky.social
Tatsuya Amano @tatsuya-amano.bsky.social · Sep 19
実際、英語と非英語の両方の論文を含めると、生産性の格差は大きく減少しました。むしろ、英語を第一言語としない研究者や低所得国出身の研究者は、英語を第一言語とする高所得国の研究者よりも、全体として多くの論文を発表していました。
3/5

tatsuya-amano.bsky.social
Tatsuya Amano @tatsuya-amano.bsky.social · Sep 19
我々が以前下記の論文でも一例を示したように、女性や英語非ネイティブ、低所得国出身の研究者は科学活動を行う上で様々な障壁に直面しているため、ここで示された生産性の格差は、これらの研究者の真の生産性を反映している訳ではないと考えられます。
doi.org/10.1371/jour...

tatsuya-amano.bsky.social
Tatsuya Amano @tatsuya-amano.bsky.social · Sep 19
女性、英語非ネイティブ、そして低所得国の出身者は、科学の世界で不利な立場にありますが、その格差はどれほどでしょうか？本研究では、英語を第一言語としない低所得国出身の女性は、英語での論文発表数が最大70％少ないことが分かりました。1/5
doi.org/10.1371/jour...
#languagebarriers

tatsuya-amano.bsky.social
Tatsuya Amano @tatsuya-amano.bsky.social · Sep 19
Quantifying these disparities is just the first step. Breaking down systemic barriers will likely require a fundamental shift in how we conduct science. One future vision? AI enabling everyone to publish and access research in our own languages. We explore this idea here:
doi.org/10.1371/jour...
5/5
AI-mediated translation presents two possible futures for academic publishing in a multilingual world
As the availability and performance of AI for language editing and translation continues to improve, we can imagine a future in which everyone can use their own language to write, assess and read scie...
doi.org

tatsuya-amano.bsky.social
Tatsuya Amano @tatsuya-amano.bsky.social · Sep 19
We should stop using metrics based solely on publications in English to evaluate the performance of researchers. Instead we should focus on *what* is published, not just *where*, as advocated by DORA: sfdora.org
4/5
Home | DORA
The Declaration on Research Assessment recognizes the need to improve the ways in which the outputs of scholarly research are evaluated.
sfdora.org

tatsuya-amano.bsky.social
Tatsuya Amano @tatsuya-amano.bsky.social · Sep 19
Indeed when we included both English and non-English publications, the productivity gap narrowed significantly. Non-native English speakers and researchers from lower-income countries often publish *more* papers overall than their native English-speaking, high-income counterparts.
3/5
Scientific productivity gap narrows significantly, when we look at total publications including those in non-English languages. Shown are the maximum % differences in the number of English-language and non-English-language peer-reviewed papers published by female native English speakers from a high-income country (-45%), female non-native English speakers from a high-income country (-35%), and female non-native English speakers from a lower-middle income country (-25%), compared to male native English speakers from a high-income country (red flag).

tatsuya-amano.bsky.social
Tatsuya Amano @tatsuya-amano.bsky.social · Sep 19
Obviously this does not reflect the true productivity of researchers facing gender, economic and #languagebarriers, as they face tremendous hurdles when conducting various scientific activities, as we previously showed in this paper for non-native English speakers:
doi.org/10.1371/jour...
2/5
Estimated disadvantages for non-native English speakers when conducting different scientific activities. The height of hurdles indicates the relative length of time taken to read an English-language paper (Reading), to write a paper in English (Writing), and to prepare an oral presentation in English (Presentation), and the relative frequency of an English-language paper being rejected (Paper rejection) or requested to revise (Paper revision) due to English writing, for non-native English speakers (Non-native), compared to native English speakers (Native).

Reposted by Nicole Boivin, Martín A. Núñez, Joaquín Hortal , and 4 more

tatsuya-amano.bsky.social
Tatsuya Amano @tatsuya-amano.bsky.social · Sep 19
Women, non-native English speakers & those form low-income countries are disadvantaged in science but by how much? We found that women with non-English first languages from low-income countries publish up to 70% fewer in English than their counterparts. 1/5
doi.org/10.1371/jour...
#languagebarriers
Scientific productivity gap based on English-language peer-reviewed papers. Shown are the maximum % differences in the number of peer-reviewed papers published by female native English speakers from a high-income country (-45%), female non-native English speakers from a high-income country (-60%), and female non-native English speakers from a lower-middle income country (-70%), compared to male native English speakers from a high-income country (red flag).