Paul J Davies
banner
pauljdavies.bsky.social
Paul J Davies
@pauljdavies.bsky.social

Has views on banking and finance for Bloomberg Opinion.
Just because you “like” something doesn’t mean you *like* something…
Money. Music. Books and Bad like really atrocious Jokes. Also #COYS

Business 46%
Economics 14%
Pinned
🧵 A massive sell-off in Treasury markets is threatening to turn Trump’s tariff war into full blown financial crisis. Hedge funds unwinding highly leveraged basis trades is fuel to these fire sales – that’s bad on its own, but these trades are much more important than just bets on markets.
Shadow Banks Are Too Big to Stay in the Shadows
Mega hedge funds are so critical to modern finance they should be regulated more like banks.
www.bloomberg.com

Reposted by Paul Davies

Seen on Reddit:

"42 is just old people 6 7"

And... well... yeah. Can't really argue.

Hang on... where was his thigh? How did it get mistaken for the arm of a chair?

top work

sometimes unfortunately it's both

Bust your gate and leave a broke down Sierra full of rubbish in the drive
install a conservatory to own the libs. perfect.

www.thetimes.com/life-style/p...

But it's not Soo in English either?
install a conservatory to own the libs. perfect.

www.thetimes.com/life-style/p...

Damnit "me too"!

My typing is even worse than usual today for some reason. Ansd it's never good!

We too. This is like a TV series I've heard of and lots of people seem to talk about but I've never watched it and it's way too late to bother starting, especially as it sounds shit.

In American, why is it realizing, but not rizing?

LOL

JPMorgan is building a new office in Canary Wharf. Goldman Sachs is creating 500 (count em!) new jobs in Birmingham. This is just the stuff Rachel Reeves must have dreamed of when she asked the city to show its support! <strong arm emoji>

I've also just realized that if I'm the underwriter who wants to create this as a combined product, I'd have to structure the whole thing synthetically because there is no upfront net cash inflow to my books.

People's homes are the collateral here after all.

So idk. It sounds clever, but it also sounds like a fantasy. The potential complexity is probably a bit of a consumer protection issue too tbh. Especially if there is any danger of maturity or fixed-floating mismatch.

...and it's just not in there. Combing some drawdown with some income is about as racy as they seem to get. And existing ERM is still seen as an innovative and niche product - on its own! vle.actuaries.org.uk/pluginfile.p...

...for liabilties they already have. Maybe it could still work coz obvs they want to keep writing more liabilities as well as asset but maybe not yet. Lastly, I found an institute of actuaries paper on potential innovations in retirement products and

So it's probably quite niche? Then there's the problem of the two sides being covered by different regulatory regimes - probably fixable if the FCA wanted to write something specifically for a combined product? Also, the big ERM writers are doing this biz because they want the assets...

I did some digging around and as far as I can tell this product doesn't exist. Question is why? The basic economics only work if you're really old - you need to be late 70s an older to get a higher enough annuity rate to beat the typical 6-8% liftime equity release interest rate.

So if this product does exist and the rate-arb can be lifetime fixed and is as wide as you guys reckon (and the fees not too onerous) then it would definitely be a good way of paying the mansion tax! I think we've just solved the debate.

Also, the mortgage leg would have to be lifetime fixed rate, right? Otherwise you could get into all sorts!

But it doesn't even have to be millions? Why wouldn't you do it with just £150k? (houses worth £500k of which there are many!)

Is this a product you've seen available anywhere? Is it a popular thing? Sounds like the sort of thing L&G ought to do in spades but I've never heard them talking about it. I may have just not been paying attention

I fell like the Sunday money pages ought to be full of "this one neat trick" pieces...

Yeah, sorry the penny dropped just before you posted this. You're basically talking about property mortgage-gilt rates arbitrage as a profitable cash-flow trade! That sounds very interesting. If it works so obviously, why aren't loads of people already doing it?

Only if you have another pot of money? And in which case maybe you’re not cash poor?

They already behave like them, following the boss’s strong example!

But if you've already bought your annuity in the past...?

Sure. But I think the majoriity of the cash poor we're talking about are going to be non-working, older people on pensions, right? They may have quite a decent pension income, but an extra £2.5k annual expense for a lot of those just over the £2m might be quite a chunk even if healthy?

Exactly. that's why LTVs are very restricted!