Nico Trajtenberg 🐝
@nicotrajtenberg.bsky.social
150 followers 180 following 460 posts
"Animals appear to be so similar to humans that at times it is impossible to distinguish them" K'nyo Mobutu (antropophagus) Augusto Monterroso
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
nicotrajtenberg.bsky.social
"If you're not failing every now and again, it's a sign you're not doing anything very innovative"

Woody Allen
catherinedevries.bsky.social
Every academic career is built on rejection, but we don’t show it.

CVs list publications, grants & awards, not rejected manuscripts, unfunded proposals, or failures.

But those invisible rejections shape us more than our successes ever do.

👉 catherineeunicedevries.substack.com/p/fail-bette...

🧵
Fail Better: Why Your Rejections Will Shape You More Than Your Publications
The Art of Learning from Rejection
catherineeunicedevries.substack.com
nicotrajtenberg.bsky.social
My cognitive capacity is limited to keeping track & maintaining stable relationships with just one human: Olga
rmcelreath.bsky.social
"Dunbar's Number" is a zombie that lives forever in the science press it seems. Estimates of Dunbar's Number with 95% intervals, for a range of model specifications (from doi.org/10.1098/rsbl... ):
nicotrajtenberg.bsky.social
When it reaches the threshold of being surprising and novel enough for the reviewer
pwgtennant.bsky.social
When is it appropriate to deviate from a pre-registration?"

WRONG ANSWERS ONLY

Cc @lakens.bsky.social
jessiebaldwin.bsky.social
When is it appropriate to deviate from a pre-registration, and how should this be done? 🧐

Join us to find out from Daniël Lakens @lakens.bsky.social at the next ReproducibiliTea!

October 28, 1pm GMT.

Sign up: www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/when-and-h...

@tabeasch.bsky.social @reproducibilitea.org
nicotrajtenberg.bsky.social
Essays/assignments ready for marking
unenthusiast.com
In honour of spooky month, share a 4 word horror story that only someone in your profession would understand.

rm -rf ~/
hammancheez.bsky.social
"The chancellor approved it"
nicotrajtenberg.bsky.social
Very cool episode on what is dark matter and dark energy and how do we know is out there by @tomchivers.bsky.social & @stuartjritchie.bsky.social

ps: doing one future episode on parsimony-complexity, Occam, etc in science, would be amazing!

sciencefictionspod.substack.com/p/episode-83...
Episode 83: Dark matter and dark energy
Listen now | Another (possibly unwise) foray into physics
sciencefictionspod.substack.com
nicotrajtenberg.bsky.social
Gerring is a keeper ♥️

How good is the Small Qualitative literacy book?
nicotrajtenberg.bsky.social
What a cool artistic government intervention on latest Banksy work

When repression and clumsiness join forces, the sky is the limit
nicotrajtenberg.bsky.social
Editor: the article didn't feel like it belong to the energy of our journal

Why don't you try in Annals of Proctology...?
criminologist.bsky.social
got a desk reject at a journal.

editor said 'out of scope' & referred 2 some editorials re journal scope

I sent the criteria in those editorials back to editor & asked why the paper wasn't in scope

won't change any minds but I'm not putting up with BS
nicotrajtenberg.bsky.social
What’s the point of trying to be funny by exaggerating reality when reality is already surreal?

Trump card for Epstein’s 50th birthday:
nicotrajtenberg.bsky.social
Great post by @paulbloomatyale.bsky.social

'Only interdisciplinary conversations worth having are those that go on inside a single head'

Interdisciplinary work sounds cool but in practice fails because scientists are lazy and don't engage with the methods/theories of other disciplines
nicotrajtenberg.bsky.social
♥️ Bansky’s latest work at Royal Courts of Justice in London ♥️
nicotrajtenberg.bsky.social
I have the naive belief that people can redeem themselves and deserve a second chance whatever crime they have done, but maybe is unfeasible, not realistic or even morally not just

Maybe you are right...
nicotrajtenberg.bsky.social
Editors complaining about authors using IA in such a sloppy way that they include hallucinated references of journal editors!

Unless there are costs this won't change

Start applying punishments to academic offenders: e.g. a public list of authors not allowed to publish in the journal for 2 years?
benpatrickwill.bsky.social
The AI authorship issue is real. We've caught papers that looked OK but had references to works by the *journal editors* that *do not exist*. Like, don't send us papers citing papers we know we didn't write, right?
nicotrajtenberg.bsky.social
No need to smash a bad joke like this...
🙃
nicotrajtenberg.bsky.social
This is the part I always get confused, so targets do not need to be valuable right...?
nicotrajtenberg.bsky.social
Oh no… the autoethnography virus has gone pandemic....Reflexivity levels critical