Richard McElreath 🐈‍⬛
banner
rmcelreath.bsky.social
Richard McElreath 🐈‍⬛
@rmcelreath.bsky.social

Anthropologist - Bayesian modeling - science reform - cat and cooking content too - Director @ MPI for evolutionary anthropology https://www.eva.mpg.de/ecology/staff/richard-mcelreath/

Richard McElreath is an American professor of anthropology and a director of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany. He is an author of the Statistical Rethinking applied Bayesian statistics textbook, among the first to largely rely on the Stan statistical environment, and the accompanying rethinking R language package. .. more

Psychology 22%
Sociology 21%
Pinned
If you hate statistics like I do, then you'll love my free lectures. Putting science before statistics, 20 lectures from basics of inference & causal modeling to multilevel models & dynamic state space models. It's all free, made with love and sympathy. 🧪 #stats www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...

You mean direct vs total causal effect? Or just use of structural models to derive adjustment sets? I think simplest example of latter would be widespread adjustment for post-treatment variables in experiments doi.org/10.1111/ajps...

Zizek is right: There is a reason Die Hard is set at Christmas. It is a Christmas movie because of the symbolic contrasts that allows. It is a profoundly dumb movie, yes, but it would not be the same movie if set on say Halloween, when we expect violence.

"You see, Christmas is not a holiday. It is an ideological apparatus of family unity and consumer fetishism. The magic of the film—what we enjoy without knowing—is this collision between sweet kitsch and brutal violence. This overlap is not accidental; it is the truth of Christmas under capitalism."

Note that no adjustment is necessary to estimate total effect of A on Y. It's the direct effect that needs adjustment.

cool confounding and adjustment example by @jofrhwld.bsky.social below. To estimate A –direct–> Y, must adjust for B (and C or D). If you adjust for C, it partly opens collider D, so non-causal path D <– B –> Y is opened. Easy to forget about descendants partly opening parents. Sneaky colliders.
ok, causal inference people: Lets say I have the following DAG. I see the backdoor path through C, so I adjust for C. dagitty says I *also* need to adjust for B, but I'm not sure why since there's a collider along its path?

Reposted by Richard McElreath

ok, causal inference people: Lets say I have the following DAG. I see the backdoor path through C, so I adjust for C. dagitty says I *also* need to adjust for B, but I'm not sure why since there's a collider along its path?
Come visit MPIDR in ☀️Summer 2026☀️
📣Call for Application for the "Population and Social Data Science Summer Incubator Program"
📅☀️June 8th – August 21st, 2026☀️
🗺️MPIDR in Rostock, Germany
Application Deadline: Jan 14, 2026
Apply here and learn more:
incubator.demogr.mpg.de

this is harrassment

Just as I don't think more of a paper just bc it's in Nature, I won't think less of a paper just bc it's in SR

There are indeed lots of great things in there

Nature Scientific Reports is the third most cited journal in the world smdh
Rate your score on Factor Fexcectorn.

Well done, Scientific Reports. pubpeer.com/publications...

Reposted by Richard McElreath

Happy #WplusEBSWednesday! Interested in learning about Bayesian data analysis but unsure how to start?

Today, a follower would like to recommend a great online resource: a series of YouTube videos by @rmcelreath.bsky.social based on his book Statistical Rethinking!

www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdnM...
Statistical Rethinking 2023 - 01 - The Golem of Prague
YouTube video by Richard McElreath
www.youtube.com
Rate your score on Factor Fexcectorn.

Well done, Scientific Reports. pubpeer.com/publications...

It's the Romans' fault if you think about it

This sounds like @avehtari.bsky.social territory

Reposted by Richard McElreath

Anyone have experience analysing periodicity (eg with Fourier) in data with gaps/missings (eg weekends, holidays) - this is in a health context if it helps? Looking for guides to pitfalls, etc

Reposted by Richard McElreath

Discard an axiom

#obliquestrategies

no thread mentioning thanksgiving turkeys complete without bsky.app/profile/cpsc...
There is a post circulating on Bluesky encouraging the moving of a frozen turkey straight into a pot of hot oil. We are combating this misinformation the best way we know how - through the power of dance music.

apparently i cannot spell "buffalo" - baffulo looks fine to me

there's a place in my neighborhood that serves buffola burgers, which are great, but I think they must be Polish buffola

were american bison domesticated at all? they are pretty easy to ranch

is it odd that the Americas produced so many great plant domesticates — potatoes, chilis, avocados, corn, chocolate — but few good animal domesticates? guinea pugs, llama, turkey-cocks, a few surviving dog breeds (husky?)

in anticipation of turkey defenders
a man in a tuxedo is asking why are you booing me i 'm right
ALT: a man in a tuxedo is asking why are you booing me i 'm right
media.tenor.com

ppl are saying blueskey is boring so here is my cat Mischka inspecting a frozen duck. this is for thanksgiving - finding a quality turkey in Germany is not easy. But since turkey is an angry trash bird, a succulent duck will do just fine

I explain this trick in my online lectures - lecture 13 40min: youtu.be/sgqMkZeslxA?...

done and done - problem was strong posterior curvature (phrasing!) so I refactored the priors and now all smooth

The quote in the dashboard is from renowned American statistician O'Shea Jackson

A mentee sent me this broken chain and imma fix. This will be my one completed task of the day, shining high above dark swamp of collapsed scientific construction sites lurking beneath the clouds of bureaucracy!

Reposted by Richard McElreath

I had not seen this before. Very interesting, by Jane Goodall - taken from the transcipt of this interview: freakonomics.com/podcast/jane...