Bart Crisp
@crispybart.bsky.social
390 followers 440 following 1.1K posts
Aspiring Renaissance dude, special interests include education, politics, history, heavy metal, tabletop roleplaying, being a massive nerd in general, and a bit of rugby here and there. Views entirely my own* (subject to conditions)
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
crispybart.bsky.social
Wishing you a smooth operation and a speedy recovery
crispybart.bsky.social
Same for Coventry, N Birmingham and Leamington Spa. Now I live in Bristol and the housing market here behaves as if it's on a different planet. National policy here just can't grapple with the issue, because it's not a national problem, it's a hugely acute local one
Reposted by Bart Crisp
jakemgrumbach.bsky.social
“Win every election” is not a viable strategy for preventing authoritarianism
Reposted by Bart Crisp
nicholasgrossman.bsky.social
If we must do a comparison of which American president did a better job securing the release of Israeli hostages, the answer is Joe Biden.
thefred.bsky.social
Biden's cease-fires got 135 living hostages released. Trump's got 20 (which is less than it would have been had he enforced the continuation of the January cease fire).
Reposted by Bart Crisp
danpaskins.bsky.social
Strongly support this idea from @mrjlauder.bsky.social. "Is spending money on a particular service better than a cash transfer" is a good way of learning how to improve services and reduce inequalities
mrjlauder.bsky.social
EEF RCT proposal: give EHCP money as a direct cash transfer to families.

Reckon there's a good chance that would lead to better outcomes.

Worth finding out - this would tell us a lot about a lot.
Reposted by Bart Crisp
cooperlund.online
I've been blaming memes for this, and I think it fits. A lot of the angriest people out there aren't actually consuming news, they're consuming news-flavored content, and the content is a funhouse mirror version of reality that they're mistaking for being real.
crispybart.bsky.social
So 2 things here: firstly, I think "great people compared to the Gallaghers" is not a high bar, but more I don't know that music fans necessarily want artists to be great people.

But also LB never hit big with their emotionally expressive stuff. They did make it, but most people didn't listen
crispybart.bsky.social
The good news is that there is now a generation of musicians who were massively influenced by that period and are making all kinds of tributes to it in their music, and said music fucks hard. Spiritbox (who are awesome) were going to tour with Limp Bizkit before Covid blew it up a few years back
crispybart.bsky.social
Indeed. Nu-metal rose to prominence by helping people having a terrible time process that, and then got coattailed by antisocial affluent dickheads who became synonymous with it.

Great video essay on the history of the genre here btw:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUtQ...
crispybart.bsky.social
Which I found kind of astonishing given that they specifically namechecked two musicians who had been sexually assaulted while very young and were very unambiguously using their music to process that experience, JD in particular. But nu-metal is never going to shake off the Woodstock 99 stink
crispybart.bsky.social
They have, but in critical circles they are still routinely caricatured as the face of the "worst music genre ever". I've seen someone with lofty critical aspirations describe CB (and Jonathan Davis) as making music to the effect of "mom forgot my lunchables AGAIN"
crispybart.bsky.social
Qua @iandunt.bsky.social and How Westminster Works etc, I'm thinking about stuff like the sequencing and scheduling of debate as well as scrutiny of the output
crispybart.bsky.social
At the risk of falling into the consistent trap of looking at something that goes well and trying to make it do everything and thus hobbling its actual effectiveness, is there any scope for select committees to be plugged into the drafting and revision process more?
crispybart.bsky.social
"The only acceptable form of democracy is the one which, entirely coincidentally, has consistently rewarded me despite my many failures and vast and persistent national unpopularity"
crispybart.bsky.social
If your criteria for anti-fascism pays no attention to someone's position on engaging in concrete opposition to Putin's imperialist and fascist invasion of Ukraine, I think that indicates a serious flaw in the criteria, personally
crispybart.bsky.social
But hey if he wants to diminish the brand who am I to etc etc
crispybart.bsky.social
Personally I thought the value of the Law was in highlighting times that a headline is chosen in order to push an already-debunked factual assertion with plausible deniability. Expanding it to "questions in headlines are always wrong" seems to lose that punch to me, because it's clearly untrue
crispybart.bsky.social
Just to point out one specific thing about the general dumbness going on around this excellent piece - Betteridge's Law of Headlines, as I understand it, refers to a practice used around news pieces, not opinion pieces. It's a category error to invoke it here
crispybart.bsky.social
American pancakes are bad, yes
crispybart.bsky.social
It's a somewhat heretical opinion but I actually think the film is better than the comic, which isn't that far off being mindlessly bleak IMO
Reposted by Bart Crisp
youngvulgarian.marieleconte.com
something quite brain-melting about the hard right's position apparently now being "we hate all Muslims and distrust Muslim states, aside from that one Muslim place that still has slavery because that sounds fun"
crispybart.bsky.social
Yup, the museum covers it pretty unsparingly
Reposted by Bart Crisp