KurtChester66Red 451
@chester66red.bsky.social
4.3K followers 2.7K following 19K posts
Woke | He/him| DC movies| Bi|Pan|
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
chester66red.bsky.social
Happy anniversary and congratulations
chester66red.bsky.social
Yeah lol, definitely clumsy frequently plus second one accurate I’ve seen about Capricorns
Reposted by KurtChester66Red 451
chester66red.bsky.social
I wouldn’t dare
I’ve looked and it’s definitely not my thing
Reposted by KurtChester66Red 451
ericdienstfrey.bsky.social
So Jurassic Park is about a group of rich people who don't understand that biology is far more complicated than "there are only two genders" and how this ignorance toward gender fluidity in nature causes these rich people to lose their money and die.
chester66red.bsky.social
Why would you need AI erotica when you are online and there’s allsorts of sources for erotica plus actual living breathing people who ain’t AI, you can find free erotica pretty easily
mattburgess1.bsky.social
Oh good, ChatGPT is getting "erotica for verified adults" later this year
We made ChatGPT pretty restrictive to make sure we were being careful with mental health issues. We realize this made it less useful/enjoyable to many users who had no mental health problems, but given the seriousness of the issue we wanted to get this right.

Now that we have been able to mitigate the serious mental health issues and have new tools, we are going to be able to safely relax the restrictions in most cases.

In a few weeks, we plan to put out a new version of ChatGPT that allows people to have a personality that behaves more like what people liked about 4o (we hope it will be better!). If you want your ChatGPT to respond in a very human-like way, or use a ton of emoji, or act like a friend, ChatGPT should do it (but only if you want it, not because we are usage-maxxing).

In December, as we roll out age-gating more fully and as part of our “treat adult users like adults” principle, we will allow even more, like erotica for verified adults.
chester66red.bsky.social
and anti-LGBTQ+ yet too many including supposed allies didn’t care about the obvious because GTTO whilst ignoring he’s a Tory in red
chester66red.bsky.social
Plus banning the torture and abuse of LGBTQ+ whilst saying they are ok with it via cass, Keir also refused to sign an anti-transphobia pledge and praised a church that tortures and abuses LGBTQ+, he also backtracked and lied after a leadership Rejoin campaign, he was showing he’s a liar, hypocrite
chester66red.bsky.social
So the government’s doesnt know the council’s role then?
Reposted by KurtChester66Red 451
zoetreez.bsky.social
🩸unnamed, unvarnished🩸
acrylic in canvas -
acrylic painting by Zoë Treez - 2025 

painted in only reds, purples and black- a vampiric/gothic outdoor setting is depicted on a stretched canvas (gently sitting on a shrub for display). the composition contains a large, pointed castle, positioned slightly to the right of a large glowing full moon. in the foreground, to the left of the canvas, is a twisting dead tree. From the castle to the viewers perspective, there is a grassy path leading you to its ominous structures. surrounded by plants, foliage and trees of various textures. this is an original painting, all done by hand with zero sketch. this painting took a total of about 9 hours. thank you for viewing
Reposted by KurtChester66Red 451
patrickharvie.bsky.social
The whole point of human rights law is that the Government can be held to account when they breach people's rights.

If the Home Secretary doesn't like it, that's why she needs to hear it.
goodlawproject.org
Woah! So Labour's position really is, 'telling us off for breaching human rights undermines the case for human rights'? Proper Trumpian stuff from Labour's answer to Suella Braverman.
chester66red.bsky.social
Probably greens, voted green in the past, just as long as they don’t push any bigots like the water makes you gay one again
Reposted by KurtChester66Red 451
tomcoates.bsky.social
How many times do they need to demonstrate to me that I shouldn’t vote for them again. People of the center-left/left in the UK, where are you going? Greens? Lib Dems? SNP? Corbyn’s Chaos party?
goodlawproject.org
Woah! So Labour's position really is, 'telling us off for breaching human rights undermines the case for human rights'? Proper Trumpian stuff from Labour's answer to Suella Braverman.
Reposted by KurtChester66Red 451
sophiefrommars.bsky.social
I know it's ice cold by now to say Starmer's admin are just tories, but leaving the HR convention has been a Tory dream for years - decades even - and to see the govt of this supposedly liberal lawyer PM respond "well we'll just leave then" to criticism is just...

Do they really hate us THIS much??
goodlawproject.org
Woah! So Labour's position really is, 'telling us off for breaching human rights undermines the case for human rights'? Proper Trumpian stuff from Labour's answer to Suella Braverman.
Reposted by KurtChester66Red 451
Reposted by KurtChester66Red 451
webofevil.bsky.social
Just checking in again to say: I really wish I was on a wind-up but the Labour right are already pretty irredeemable, and they're only going to get worse the more they bed in.
bsky.app/profile/good...
goodlawproject.org
Woah! So Labour's position really is, 'telling us off for breaching human rights undermines the case for human rights'? Proper Trumpian stuff from Labour's answer to Suella Braverman.
Reposted by KurtChester66Red 451
kafkaesquities.bsky.social
- no, you can't even have a little human rights as a treat
- human rights organizations telling us we're violating human rights are undermining the case for human rights
- vote for us or reform wins

truly one of the policy platforms of all time
goodlawproject.org
Woah! So Labour's position really is, 'telling us off for breaching human rights undermines the case for human rights'? Proper Trumpian stuff from Labour's answer to Suella Braverman.
Reposted by KurtChester66Red 451
adamf23.bsky.social
Absolutely disgusting. The ECHR was created to deal with governments that think like this
goodlawproject.org
Woah! So Labour's position really is, 'telling us off for breaching human rights undermines the case for human rights'? Proper Trumpian stuff from Labour's answer to Suella Braverman.
Reposted by KurtChester66Red 451
humanitymustwin.bsky.social
The Starmer regime are fascists.
goodlawproject.org
Woah! So Labour's position really is, 'telling us off for breaching human rights undermines the case for human rights'? Proper Trumpian stuff from Labour's answer to Suella Braverman.
Reposted by KurtChester66Red 451
concerned-person.bsky.social
When a council of Europe expert tells you you're wrong and you stubbornly disagree because of hatred, then you dont deserve to be in government.
goodlawproject.org
Woah! So Labour's position really is, 'telling us off for breaching human rights undermines the case for human rights'? Proper Trumpian stuff from Labour's answer to Suella Braverman.