Humanity Protocol Moves from IPFS to Walrus, Powering Scalable OnChain Identity on Sui Humanity Protocol migrates from IPFS to Walrus to enable scalable onchain identity, AI fraud protection, and cross-chain verification in Sui ecosystem.
Interest | Match | Feed
Interest | Match | Feed
Origin
blockchainreporter.net
October 23, 2025 at 6:30 AM
Everybody can reply
Humanity Protocol Moves from IPFS to Walrus, Powering Scalable OnChain Identity on Sui Humanity Protocol migrates from IPFS to Walrus to enable scalable onchain identity, AI fraud protection, and cross-chain verification in Sui ecosystem.
Interest | Match | Feed
Interest | Match | Feed
Origin
blockchainreporter.net
October 23, 2025 at 5:13 AM
Everybody can reply
Two IPFS addresses for one file - how this happened? It says they are identical on a cmp level on Linux byte-by-byte comparison, but there are two addresses for them now.
Interest | Match | Feed
Interest | Match | Feed
Origin
discuss.ipfs.tech
October 23, 2025 at 12:38 AM
Everybody can reply
i worked at IPFS/PL and i’d wager to say most people would consider it that, though ultimately it doesn’t matter — it’s tech that was birthed out of the general large web3 era by one of the biggest web3 companies and was heavily utilized by most web3 projects
October 22, 2025 at 7:46 PM
Everybody can reply
5 likes
if we consider ipfs web3 sure
October 22, 2025 at 7:44 PM
Everybody can reply
2 likes
a significant amount of nfts were stored on ipfs during that wave, literally the on-chain code links to ipfs, the image is referenced from there, it's web3 man. it's fine.
October 22, 2025 at 5:50 PM
Everybody can reply
He is Principal at Supramundane Agency, Deputy Director of the IPFS Foundation, and a Senior Fellow with both the Future of Technology Institute and the Public AI network.
October 22, 2025 at 4:44 PM
Everybody can reply
1 reposts
6 likes
I could go on, but no. No no no no no. Noooo. No.
Optionality destroys interoperability in all cases, but it's even worse for content addressing because every option makes the content that much less addressable.
If you want options, we already have IPFS & IPLD :)
Optionality destroys interoperability in all cases, but it's even worse for content addressing because every option makes the content that much less addressable.
If you want options, we already have IPFS & IPLD :)
October 22, 2025 at 4:42 PM
Everybody can reply
4 likes
I'm def gonna be submitting some PRs to the godot-iroh project. I didn't expect iroh to be so good after trying to work with IPFS stuff a while back, but it's actually awesome. it actually works lmao
October 22, 2025 at 3:47 PM
Everybody can reply
Dude INVENTED the term. More importantly, his definition is what was breathlessly written about in that brief “oh shit NFTs!” post-covid moment; it’s what the world understands it to mean. It’s already in the zeitgeist. You can’t unpop that cork cause peeps at IPFS are embarrassed about crypto.
October 22, 2025 at 3:26 PM
Everybody can reply
had to break it to you, but a person or the person who originally popularized a term does not actually own or control how the underlying movement works or is grown
did you work at IPFS? Did you work at Protocol Labs? What experience within the industry do you have?
did you work at IPFS? Did you work at Protocol Labs? What experience within the industry do you have?
October 22, 2025 at 3:18 PM
Everybody can reply
4 likes
You’re drinking some serious kool-aid. Nowhere any any point has web3 been talked about or written about by Gavin Wood — you know, the etherium/crypto guy — without mention of tokenized blockchains as a core, fundamental part of the idea.
IPFS developed independently of web3.
IPFS developed independently of web3.
October 22, 2025 at 3:16 PM
Everybody can reply
Fair enough but if any new protocol allows for people to publish and read content doesn't that mean bittorrent is web3 too?
Don't see what makes ipfs web3 while bittorrent web2, unless if we're involving Protocol Labs's Filecoin in the mix
Don't see what makes ipfs web3 while bittorrent web2, unless if we're involving Protocol Labs's Filecoin in the mix
October 22, 2025 at 3:11 PM
Everybody can reply
2 likes
You could say the same about email. Is email web3?
Doesn’t matter if AT is _based_ on some of the ideas in IPFS. If the core, most important ideas (peer-to-peer hosting and delivery of content identified not by location but by hash) arent _implemeted_, it’s not web3.
Doesn’t matter if AT is _based_ on some of the ideas in IPFS. If the core, most important ideas (peer-to-peer hosting and delivery of content identified not by location but by hash) arent _implemeted_, it’s not web3.
October 22, 2025 at 2:57 PM
Everybody can reply
Ipfs is not web 3 though, it's closer to bittorrent than cryptocurrency
October 22, 2025 at 10:32 AM
Everybody can reply
1 likes
What projects should do: Use decentralized storage like IPFS or Arweave. It costs more upfront, but your NFTs don't disappear when one company has issues.
October 22, 2025 at 8:02 AM
Everybody can reply
it actively uses technology and ideas from ipfs which is extremely "web3"
October 22, 2025 at 6:32 AM
Everybody can reply
13 likes
@ KMON and you are building on ActivityPub and IPFS? is there a repo or whats the best way to follow the project? will it be FLOSS?
Interest | Match | Feed
Interest | Match | Feed
Origin
social.wake.st
October 21, 2025 at 10:43 PM
Everybody can reply
ipfs sounds perfect but its fucking dogshit
October 21, 2025 at 10:23 PM
Everybody can reply
4 likes
Sad that IPFS pushed for NFTs to rely on their tech as it'd actually decentralize the storage of these pictures and none of these grifters entertained it despite it actually being decentralized.
NFTs are a scam but they didn't even try hard enough IMO.
NFTs are a scam but they didn't even try hard enough IMO.
October 21, 2025 at 4:34 PM
Everybody can reply
5 likes
Why weren't these stored via IPFS?
Does having a central point of failure completely defeat the point of "Web3"?
Does having a central point of failure completely defeat the point of "Web3"?
October 21, 2025 at 3:53 PM
Everybody can reply
1 likes
Of course IPFS essentially solves this, though it still seems odd to me that you need to use an entirely separate system to verify what the token is supposed to be pointing at.
October 21, 2025 at 3:49 PM
Everybody can reply
3 likes
NFTs are not the media but rather the certification and potential on chain functionality. They exist fundamentally to prove authority on a piece of data. The media is separate, and also usually backed up on IPFS. You just need to set up your viewer to ensure IPFS access and caching.
October 21, 2025 at 3:30 PM
Everybody can reply
3 likes
This is why you’re supposed to host the images on IPFS, which works more like a torrent
NFTs are amazing because you apparently “own” them but the AWS outtage yesterday took out everyones apes lol
October 21, 2025 at 2:49 PM
Everybody can reply
23 likes