Investors Dump Software Stocks Globally

Scholar power: 106.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 33%, Business 29%, Law 19%, Computer science 19%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Richard Baldwin	34%	108	106.0%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

2.2 h

1

106.0%

Ranking score

0.517

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Robert B. Reich Reposted by Beatriz Gallardo Paúls

26%

Scholar power: 26.2%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 33%, Business 29%, Law 19%, Computer science 19%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Robert B. Reich	14%	37	25.5%
🎓 Beatriz Gallardo Paúls	2%	10	0.6%
Total			26.2%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index + sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

52.0%

10.7 h

1824

26.2%

Ranking score

0.314

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Robert Reich

@rbreich.bsky.social

Reminder: Palantir sells AI tools that help law enforcement agencies like ICE analyze massive amounts of personal data. It's a big reason why it is quickly becoming the most dangerous corporation in America. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_VwyhErd88

The Most Dangerous Corporation in America?

The AI surveillance state is real — and it's being built by Palantir.

www.youtube.com

February 4, 2026 at 10:31 PM

Reposted by Greg Linden

15%

Scholar power: 15.3%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 33%, Business 29%, Law 19%, Computer science 19%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Greg Linden	32%	23	15.3%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

55.0%

7.8 h

45

15.3%

Ranking score

0.129

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Ashton Pittman

@ashtonpittman.bsky.social

"One notable MIT study found that 95 percent of companies that integrated AI saw zero meaningful growth in revenue. For coding tasks, one of AI’s most widely hyped applications, another study showed that programmers who used AI coding tools actually became slower at their jobs.”

AI Completely Failing to Boost Productivity, Says Top Analyst

AI may or may not excel at a lot of things, but from an economic standpoint, it's definitely not making us more productive.

futurism.com

February 5, 2026 at 1:29 AM

by Erik Brynjolfsson

75%

Scholar power: 75.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 33%, Business 29%, Law 19%, Computer science 19%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Erik Brynjolfsson	27%	86	75.1%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

52.0%

32.7 h

25

75.1%

Ranking score

0.126

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Yoshua Bengio Reposted by Jack Stilgoe, Brigitte Nerlich

57%

Scholar power: 57.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 33%, Business 29%, Law 19%, Computer science 19%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Yoshua Bengio	12%	213	52.5%
🎓 Jack Stilgoe	8%	31	4.5%
🎓 Brigitte Nerlich	1%	51	0.7%
Total			57.7%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index + sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

51.0%

44.1 h

25

57.7%

Ranking score

0.118

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Yoshua Bengio

@yoshuabengio.bsky.social

Today we’re releasing the International AI Safety Report 2026: the most comprehensive evidence-based assessment of AI capabilities, emerging risks, and safety measures to date. 🧵

(1/19)

February 3, 2026 at 1:16 PM

Reposted by Aric Rindfleisch

14%

Scholar power: 14.2%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 33%, Business 29%, Law 19%, Computer science 19%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Aric Rindfleisch	23%	38	14.2%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

51.0%

8.3 h

71

14.2%

Ranking score

0.101

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Reposted by Greg Linden

15%

Scholar power: 15.3%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 33%, Business 29%, Law 19%, Computer science 19%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Greg Linden	32%	23	15.3%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

50.0%

8.5 h

46

15.3%

Ranking score

0.085

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

CNBC

@cnbc.com

Software experiencing 'most exciting moment' as AI fears hammer the stocks

Shares of software companies have been getting beaten up, and the selloff accelerated this week after Anthropic's latest unveiling.

cnb.cx

February 5, 2026 at 12:44 AM

Reposted by Aric Rindfleisch

14%

Scholar power: 14.2%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 33%, Business 29%, Law 19%, Computer science 19%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Aric Rindfleisch	23%	38	14.2%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

52.0%

22.7 h

327

14.2%

Ranking score

0.063

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Reposted by Douglas Holtz‐Eakin

23%

Scholar power: 23.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 33%, Business 29%, Law 19%, Computer science 19%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Douglas Holtz‐Eakin	36%	44	23.9%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

55.0%

9.7 h

2

23.9%

Ranking score

0.055

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Robert M. Wachter

25%

Scholar power: 25.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 33%, Business 29%, Law 19%, Computer science 19%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Robert M. Wachter	10%	70	25.1%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

9.2 h

2

25.1%

Ranking score

0.041

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Reposted by Robert Klitgaard

4%

Scholar power: 4.5%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 33%, Business 29%, Law 19%, Computer science 19%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Robert Klitgaard	9%	25	4.5%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

52.0%

17.1 h

806

4.5%

Ranking score

0.036

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Pedro Domingos

35%

Scholar power: 35.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 33%, Business 29%, Law 19%, Computer science 19%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Pedro Domingos	13%	84	35.7%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

53.0%

38.8 h

8

35.7%

Ranking score

0.032

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Robert M. Wachter

25%

Scholar power: 25.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 33%, Business 29%, Law 19%, Computer science 19%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Robert M. Wachter	10%	70	25.1%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

50.0%

33.0 h

13

25.1%

Ranking score

0.033

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Hakan Yilmazkuday

57%

Scholar power: 57.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 33%, Business 29%, Law 19%, Computer science 19%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Hakan Yilmazkuday	38%	25	57.0%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

51.0%

31.8 h

0

57.0%

Ranking score

0.024

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

HAKAN YILMAZKUDAY

@yilmazkuday.bsky.social

"Artificial Intelligence and Labor Markets: Evidence from Google Trends" has been published at the Journal of Economics and Finance: doi.org/10.1007/s12197-025-... Free working paper version is available at dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.482...

February 4, 2026 at 1:30 AM

by Yoshua Bengio

52%

Scholar power: 52.5%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 33%, Business 29%, Law 19%, Computer science 19%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Yoshua Bengio	12%	213	52.5%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

51.0%

44.0 h

3

52.5%

Ranking score

0.021

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Yoshua Bengio

@yoshuabengio.bsky.social

AI poses an “evidence dilemma” to policymakers—capabilities evolve quickly, but scientific evidence emerges far more slowly.
Acting too early risks entrenching ineffective policies, but waiting for strong evidence may leave society vulnerable to risks.

(3/19)

February 3, 2026 at 1:16 PM

Reposted by Luke Zettlemoyer

13%

Scholar power: 13.5%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 33%, Business 29%, Law 19%, Computer science 19%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Luke Zettlemoyer	14%	93	13.5%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

47.0%

13.2 h

7

13.5%

Ranking score

0.02

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Eric J. Topol

4%

Scholar power: 4.3%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 33%, Business 29%, Law 19%, Computer science 19%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Eric J. Topol	1%	203	4.3%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

50.0%

36.5 h

8

4.3%

Ranking score

0.019

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Yoshua Bengio

52%

Scholar power: 52.5%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 33%, Business 29%, Law 19%, Computer science 19%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Yoshua Bengio	12%	213	52.5%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

55.0%

44.0 h

3

52.5%

Ranking score

0.021

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Yoshua Bengio

@yoshuabengio.bsky.social

These capabilities are increasingly translating into real-world impact.
At least 700 million people now use leading AI systems weekly. In the US, use of AI has spread faster than that of computers and the internet.

(8/19)

February 3, 2026 at 1:16 PM

by Pedro Domingos

35%

Scholar power: 35.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 33%, Business 29%, Law 19%, Computer science 19%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Pedro Domingos	13%	84	35.7%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

47.0%

38.8 h

2

35.7%

Ranking score

0.019

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Dorothy Bishop Reposted by Zen Faulkes

0%

Scholar power: 0.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 33%, Business 29%, Law 19%, Computer science 19%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Dorothy Bishop	-	114	-
🎓 Zen Faulkes	2%	19	0.9%
Total			0.9%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

48.0%

11.7 h

2

0.9%

Ranking score

0.018

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Dorothy Bishop

@deevybee.bsky.social

@dereklowe.bsky.social finds some AI slop
www.science.org/content/blog...
🙁

What the Literature is Filling Up With

www.science.org

February 4, 2026 at 9:32 PM

Add to Home Screen

Light up
your news

Investors Dump Software Stocks Globally

Add to Home Screen

Light upyour news

Investors Dump Software Stocks Globally

Scholar power: 106.0%

Scholar power: 26.2%

Scholar power: 15.3%

Scholar power: 75.1%

Scholar power: 57.7%

Scholar power: 14.2%

Scholar power: 15.3%

Scholar power: 14.2%

Scholar power: 23.9%

Scholar power: 25.1%

Scholar power: 4.5%

Scholar power: 35.7%

Scholar power: 25.1%

Scholar power: 57.0%

Scholar power: 52.5%

Scholar power: 13.5%

Scholar power: 4.3%

Scholar power: 52.5%

Scholar power: 35.7%

Scholar power: 0.9%

Sign in to Lightnews

Sign up to start reading

Connect Bluesky

Connect with Bluesky

Light up
your news