AV🕯️ Ctrl+Alt+Del
LightNews LightNews
banner
yappydagger.bsky.social
AV🕯️ Ctrl+Alt+Del
@yappydagger.bsky.social
7K followers 3K following 13K posts
#DontTreadOnMeWithYourReligion
Politics, film, photography, art, music, history #61,066

Banner pic fr Yojimbo: a samurai stands amid tall grass looking up at the sky. Pfp is a rhinoceros illustration detail.
Posts Replies Media Videos
yappydagger.bsky.social
Ahhh, such an interesting, informative project and the illustrations are quite lovely.
November 28, 2025 at 11:09 PM
Reposted by AV🕯️ Ctrl+Alt+Del
nora.zone
the chicken bot posts the text of the prologue of my dad's upcoming book with every word replaced with "bok". i made it to learn regular expressions
November 28, 2025 at 12:53 AM
yappydagger.bsky.social
Lol
November 28, 2025 at 10:54 PM
Reposted by AV🕯️ Ctrl+Alt+Del
gettymuseum.bsky.social
🔎 Discover more about European drawing technique from 1550 to 1850 in Learning to Draw, on view at the Getty Center through January 25, 2026.

✍️ gty.art/42ZB6qL
Learning to Draw | Getty Exhibitions
Explore the mastery of drawing from 1550–1850. Discover how artistic training shaped the foundation of the arts in Europe.
www.getty.edu
November 28, 2025 at 10:46 PM
Reposted by AV🕯️ Ctrl+Alt+Del
juliedicaro.bsky.social
I’m only able to stay on top of court filings because of my generous paid subscribers. Please consider becoming one!
juliedicaro.bsky.social Julie DiCaro @juliedicaro.bsky.social · 4h
Hi! If you’re looking to support independent media this #BlackFriday - I’d love for you to check out my newsletter, which is a mix of legal journalism, news, sports, politics, and media from a feminist point of view.

Subscriptions start at $1 per month.

losingmyperspicacity.beehiiv.com/subscribe
Losing My Perspicacity
News. Feminism. Sports. Laughs.
losingmyperspicacity.beehiiv.com
November 28, 2025 at 9:29 PM
Reposted by AV🕯️ Ctrl+Alt+Del
juliedicaro.bsky.social
“It therefore ORDERS that by December 5, 2025, the Government shall submit declarations from all individuals involved in the decision not to halt the transfer of class members out of U.S. physical custody on March 15 and 16, 2025. Such declarations shall detail their roles in such decision.”
In conducting such inquiry, Plaintiffs submit that the Court should “require the government to promptly file declaration(s) identifying all individuals involved in the decision not to halt the transfer of class members out of U.S. physical custody on March 15 and 16, 2025.” ECF No. 193 (Pl. Resp.) at 1. “[O]nce these declarations are filed and depending on what information they disclose, the Court should then determine the appropriate sequence of witness testimony, and the manner in which that testimony should be provided.” Id. The Government similarly notes: “If the Court believes any further information is needed for [its inquiry], Defendants respectfully request an opportunity to provide that information to the Court by way of declarations in the first instance (as even Plaintiffs agree is appropriate).” Def. Resp. at 1. The Court will adopt the parties’ agreement on starting with declarations; it will then assess the need for witness testimony. It therefore ORDERS that by December 5, 2025, the Government shall submit declarations from all individuals involved in the decision not to halt the transfer of class members out of U.S. physical custody on March 15 and 16, 2025. Such declarations shall detail their roles in such decision.
November 28, 2025 at 9:23 PM
Reposted by AV🕯️ Ctrl+Alt+Del
juliedicaro.bsky.social
“…the Court is not prepared at this juncture to terminate its inquiry. Instead, it must determine whether Secretary Noem or anyone else should be referred for potential contempt prosecution.”
At the hearing on November 19, 2025, the Court offered both sides an opportunity to propose next steps in its inquiry into whether a criminal-contempt referral is appropriate. The Government, now for the first time, has identified who purportedly made the decision not to recall planes containing Alien Enemies Act detainees on March 15, 2025: Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. See ECF No. 195 (Def. Resp.) at 2. Defendants nonetheless maintain, relying heavily on Judge Katsas’s concurring opinion for the D.C. Circuit panel, that her decision was proper and not contumacious. Id. at 3–4 (citing J.G.G. v. Trump, 147 F.4th 1044, 1052 (D.C. Cir. 2025) (Katsas, J., concurring)). As a result, the Government posits that “no further steps are warranted” because “Defendants did not violate this Court’s order.” Id. at 1. Given that the other two panel members (plus the majority of the en banc court) did not agree with J. Katsas, the Court is not prepared at this juncture to terminate its inquiry. Instead, it must determine whether Secretary Noem or anyone else should be referred for potential contempt prosecution. In other words, the Court must decide if: (1) the court order was “clear and reasonably specific”; (2) “the defendant violated the order”; and (3) “the violation was willful.”
November 28, 2025 at 9:21 PM
Reposted by AV🕯️ Ctrl+Alt+Del
juliedicaro.bsky.social
Days ago, the gov’t revealed that Kristi Noem made the ultimate decision, even after she’d been advised of Boasberg’s order.
November 28, 2025 at 9:19 PM
Reposted by AV🕯️ Ctrl+Alt+Del
chadbourn.bsky.social
"Two survivors were clinging to the smoldering wreck. The Special Operations commander overseeing the Sept. 2 attack ... ordered a second strike to comply with Hegseth’s instructions."

This is a war crime.
November 28, 2025 at 7:43 PM