He became the president — twice. It would hard to demonstrate that his life was an obvious case of misallocated energies.

seems to have worked pretty good. it would be hard to disprove.

This would hard one to define/title but could be amazing. My working title is THE CONSENSUS. In 1900 labor and capital were at war and media outlets just took sides. In 1950-1980 newspapers and broadcast outlets represented the middle and did not "take sides." And now we're back to 1900 again.

Honest answer: I haven't seen this said. Aviation from Wright to Armstrong and beyond.

Oddly enough, this got floated as a possible Burns topic on The Watch podcast with Andy Greenberg and Chris Ryan today. Ryan is a little bit notorious for having difficulty giving up his fondness for cigarettes in an era in which that doesn't really fly.

It would be a very depressing story.

Fraud and Malfeasance in Railroad Hiring Practices

For years Time magazine LIED to me about ... the date I would be seeing it

Incredible picture. I know exactly where that building is, I have walked by it many times. Might have to go inside!

I'm not super surprised that almost every US citizen — who don't pick up and move every time some number appears in the financial page of the newspaper — is better at economics than Scott Bessent.

On top of everything else, it would probably be bad for Republican politicians, having a bunch of Democratic voters invade Republican states.

Just lovely.

Got to admit.

Also I live in the city where Myles Garrett plays. (No shade.)