You and your family enjoy your holiday, ma'am!! 🦃

If the shoe fits, which, by your own words, it does... 🤷🏽‍♀️

👋🏽

I'm sure some spin on him being a messaging/tactics genius will come out of it like it did for when he decided a photo op with trump was a good idea.

To sum up my point:

If you're claiming something doesn't exist, you should at least put in the effort to make sure it doesn't exist. You did not.

You fall in that category.

Also. I don't care what Rs do with something such as this.

As for Mamdani. It seems he's in AOC-level shit with leftists because he endorsed Jeffries, all while leftists are screaming to primary him. So I'll sit on the sidelines to see how that plays out.

My point, which you missed, is that if someone is making the claim that something doesn't exist then I'd expect that they know it doesn't exist because they have LOOKED FOR IT. And if they have not looked for something they claim does not exist, then YES, that is, indeed, a problem.

I'm talking about "individuals like yourself" as I stated. You said Dems "still don't have an affirmative platform or plan." I showed you that they do and have had one for decades. It evolves, but it's there.

Oh, I hear you. This is your post that I replied to, just for reference:

He really thinks he's had a "profound influence" on politics? Wut?

Another large follower regressive account.

But voters decided putting an incompetent fucking moron in office was preferable to, among other things, having healthcare that we could make more affordable. So here we fucking are arguing between food and fucking healthcare...

But again, that doesn't fucking mean what's happening with the ACA is good. It was never fucking good.

So those 2 ducking things can be true.

You may be able to decide that continuing to not get paid, not be able to pay bills, mortgage, etc and not have the needed benefits for food was worth it, but I'd never be that fucking callous.

and felt there was room to address further issues in the future (Jan, in this case).

I'm not fucking saying either choice was a good one. What I am saying is that people were on the verge of losing fucking everything now because they weren't being paid and had no subsidy for food.

Just because not all Senators signed onto the agreement, that doesn't mean they believed some should starve or others should have their ACA premiums increase. It meant they came to different conclusions on what best served their constituents in their state

No one forgot. What happened is what often happens when legislators legislate, at least for Dems. Senators listen to their constituents instead of loudmouths on social media.

I doubt Leader Jeffries cares about Socialism and how maga defines it.

Also, next shut down YOU can choose how long people go without food or a paycheck. In fact, YOU can pick up their bills for them since you wanted the shutdown to continue. How bout that?